posted 12 March 2005 09:17 AM            

Evil Euro wrote:

quote:

---

1) I never said pre-historic East Africans were Caucasoid. I've shown evidence that they were non-Negroid "generalized moderns".

---

quote:

---

You're quite delusional. What's been proven is that Negroids are of recent West African origin, that they spread east beginning c. 1000 B.C., and that pre-historic East Africans were generalized moderns. E3b, of course, is associated with the Caucasoid populations of North Africa, West Asia and Europe, and the hybrid populations of East Africa. It's not associated with unmixed Negroids.

---

quote:

---

I said they were "proto-Caucasoid and proto-Mongoloid" (according to Howells). You can add to that proto-Negroid. In other words, generalized moderns not belonging to any existing race.

---

When confronted with facts that refuted his frivolous theories, he has now jumped to saying this:

quote:

---

This is from the Table of Contents in Coon's Races of Europe:

Chapter II: Pleistocene White Men
(1) Introducing Homo Sapiens
(2) Pleistocene Climate
(3) Sapiens Men of the Middle Pleistocene
(4) Non-Sapiens Pleistocene Fossil Men
(5) The Neanderthal Hybrids of Palestine
(6) Upper Palaeolithic Man in Europe, the Evidence as a Whole
(7) Chronological and Geographical Differentiation of the European Aurignacian Group
(8) Upper Palaeolithic Hunters of North Africa
(9) Aurignacian Man in East Africa
(10) The Magdalenians
(11) Upper Palaeolithic Man in China
(12) Summary and Conclusions

From (12) Summary and Conclusions:

(1) Homo sapiens was fully evolved as early as the mid-Pleistocene, if not earlier.

(2) The earliest Homo sapiens known, as represented by several examples from Europe and Africa, was an ancestral long-headed white man of short stature and moderately great brain size.

(3) The negro group probably evolved parallel to this white strain, from a related sapiens ancestor. At what point the ancestors of negroes and whites diverged is not known.

---

quote:

---

The only thing "outdated" about Coon are some of his theories, which have been disproven. But that goes for all of the old anthropologists, including the Afronut favorites. Coon's observational data is as valid today as it was when he compiled it. He looked at skeletal remains from Pleistocene East Africa, and saw that they were Caucasoid. Nothing speculative about that. Just a cold, hard fact.

---

To even making these two separate points in this thread:

quote:

---

That said, Southern Europeans are, of course, not hybrid. Whereas East Africans most certainly are. Which brings us right back to the Bottom Line and your painfully obvious lack of answers......And I've never claimed that East Africans were once light-skinned. They were, however, skeletally Caucasoid and not Negroid.

---

I would just ignore this troll, he's baiting, he isn't making any points except running himself around in circles. How can one quote Howells one minute to say a population is generalised modern and then jump back to even more outdated rubbish and say that same population is Caucasoid, especially when that same author said 'Neanderthal-Hybrids' are Caucasoids? Its obvious this guy is quoting rubbish for his own amusement. I personally have answered all of his rubbish, yet he is still asking others for answers, thats a sign of baiting and trolling. Ignore this clown.

posted 13 March 2005 05:50 AM            

quote:

---

Top Dog writes: EE's conflicting and contradictory statement have shown that he is not attempting to tell the truth about anything.

---

quote:

---

EE writes: I never said pre-historic East Africans were Caucasoid

---

quote:

---

EE writes: Topic: Pre-historic East Africa Caucasoids

---

posted 17 March 2005 08:18 AM            

quote:

---

EE writes: I never said pre-historic East Africans were Caucasoid

---

quote:

---

EE writes: Topic: Pre-historic East Africa Caucasoids

---

posted 27 March 2005 02:45 PM            

quote:

---

Lemba.... have a Caucasoid racial component, and accompanying maps group them with or near Caucasoid populations, away from Negroids

---

Erroneous E:

quote:

---

Lemba have negligible [Caucasoid] admixture

---

posted 28 March 2005 08:20 AM            

Your current dissembling contradicts the original lie that you based your argument on to begin with.

posted 29 March 2005 08:06 AM            

quote:

---

Erroneous E wrote: the findings of the study I posted are clear:

"Ht7, Ht8, and Ht11 are Caucasoid markers and the Lemba show high frequencies of these markers"

---

quote:

---

Erroneous E wrote: Lemba have negligible Caucasoid admixture.

---

Erroneous E thinks women "carry" Y [male only] chromosome:

quote:

---

Erroneous E posts:

100% E3b-carrying Ethiopian

---

quote:

---

YodaMedit2005 wrote: This guy is a dumbass. Most of those women are from Heart of Asia website and are mixed. One of them is half Filipino. That's why the website is called afilipina! DUMBASS!

---

EuroDummy googles an Aussie Lesbian named "Somali" and posts her as and example of a Somali; actually an example of just HOW STUPID he is.

quote:

---

Supercar: What [EE] knows about E3b - mail order brides, and online Australian Lesbians.

---

posted 29 March 2005 08:34 AM            

quote:

---

EE is running himself around in circles.

---

"Vindicated" by Brace's own words

Individuals with Paranoid Personality Disorder experience a polarity in their self-image; even though their behavior may be grandiose, they are vulnerable to shame and will alternate between the impotent, despised self image and the vindicated self.

Their defenses are activated in the service of warding off shame and humiliation, they are vengeful and pursue conflict with great tenacity, never seeming to tire in their quest for self-vindication.

quote:

---

Originally posted by Djehuti:
LOL Stupid-Euro messed himself up again as usual!!

The thread should be called "Evil-Euro is Destroyed by Brace's Words"

---

EuroMonkey, enraged at being caught in a lie.

posted 20 October 2005 09:41 AM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by Horemheb:
ythe problem is that EE does not support the radical political spin that goes on here. No objective person would ever think this board has anything to do with an academic subject of any kind.

---

quote:

---

I suppose black radicalsim could be construed as an academic subject in a political science department or possibly a psychology department. Some Psych major might write an interesting thesis on the insanity and ignorance of black radicalism or possibly the ways it is connected to low IQ and dementia.

---

Again there is nothing "radical" about it! Judging by the claims Stupid-Euro has made, do you really consider THAT guy to be sane with a high IQ?! Then again, this is YOU we are talking about!

posted 20 October 2005 09:48 AM            

It would just be a blank thread, signifying his lack of a brain.