EgyptSearch Forums
  Ancient Egypt and Egyptology
  Somebody explain this to me

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   Somebody explain this to me
HERU
Member

Posts: 156
Registered: Dec 2004

posted 17 March 2005 03:23 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for HERU     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Thought2:
Thought Writes:

Horemheb, you are absolutely right. Many of the Saharan populations migrated east into the Egyptian Nile with the onset of the arid phase. This common Saharan source for BOTH Ancient Egyptians and modern West Africans is supported by the fact that southern Egyptians have high frequencies of West African derived Y-Chromosome haplogroup E3a.


I was talking to a professor online shortly after reading this and brought it up in the conversation. If I remember correctly, he called this a Saharan haplotype. This haplotype should explain any similarities (culturally, religiously, administratively etc) between ancient Egyptians and modern W. Africans, correct?

That isn't my main question though. What I really want to know is ...what happened? The Saharans that went east ultimately founded Ta-Seti and Egypt respectively. What about the Saharans that went west though? I asked this professor about the physical differences between W. Africans and E. Africans and he told me mixture with Khoisans is why E. Africans tend to look different from their W. African counterparts. The thing is, I always thought Khoisans were all over W. Africa in these times too.

I've read a little about the Nok and Kintampo cultures. I don't know if these are the earliest signs of "civilization" in W. Africa but they are the oldest I've heard of. How far do these cultures go back? I'm not sure myself but I think it's safe to surmise that they're not nearly as old as the Pre-Dynastic cultures of Upper and Lower Egypt.

It seems we have a better understanding of the Saharans that migrated east compared to those that traveled west. When Egypt was united (5,000 BC?), what were these other Saharans doing? Shouldn't there be evidence of "civilization" in or around the western fringes of the Sahara, as old as or older than Egypt?

Ghana (Wagadu) is usually mentioned as the first Sahelian kingdom. I don't think anyone sincerely knows when Ghana was established as a kingdom though. I've noticed a lot of guessing concerning this. I've also noticed a lot of guessing when it comes to the Nok and Kintampo cultures. Websites discussing W. African history usually don't mention the Nok or Kintampo cultures and jump right into Ghana. It also seems like we don't know much about W. African history before the spread of Islam.

Between the onset of Pharonic Egypt and lets say the New Kingdom (1500 BC?), what were these other Saharans doing?

IP: Logged

rasol
Member

Posts: 2435
Registered: Jun 2004

posted 17 March 2005 09:19 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for rasol     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Interesting comments and question, answers, plus other questions and general babblement to follow....

quote:
I was talking to a professor online shortly after reading this and brought it up in the conversation. If I remember correctly, he called this a Saharan haplotype. This haplotype should explain any similarities (culturally, religiously, administratively etc) between ancient Egyptians and modern W. Africans, correct?

Haplogroup are identified by mutation events which occur one time only, and are then passed on to all the male (Y chromosome) descendants of that individual.

Reading left to right, the following defines the P2 haplogroup of African origin-

Pn-2--- SRV10831.1, M42, M94, M139, M168, P9, M145, M213, Yap, SRY4064, M96, P29, P2

As you read from left to write you progress thru time, as the gene accumulates new markers over time.

You can compare this for example to R1, which is of Eurasian origin.

R1 --- SRV10831.1, M42, M94, M139, M168, P9, P14, M89, M213, M9, M45, M74, P27, 92R7, M207, UTY-1, M173.

The point of divergance in the code roughly corresponds to the point of separation between population groups.

P2 is significant because a surprising and diverse range of African ethnic groups have a common point of origin or descent marked by P2.

R1 is significant because the majority of European males are of R1 lineage.

Where in Africa P2 originated East/central Africa and eventually split into two forms...

E3a --- SRV10831.1, M42, M94, M139, M168, P9, M145, M213, Yap, SRY4064, M96, P29, P2, DYS391p, M2, P1

and...

E3b --- SRV10831.1, M42, M94, M139, M168, P9, M145, M213, Yap, SRY4064, M96, P29, P2, DYS391p, M35

Over time populations with E3b have clustered in East Africa and populations with E3a have clustered in West Africa. However have also been E3b populations in West Africa and E3a populations in East Africa since very early times.

It can't be overemphasized that whilst genetic markers can act as fingerprints, they aren't necessarily directly responsible for physical appearance, or any specific biological 'effect' for that matter. They are like birthmarks in that respect. They help identify you, but the don't necessarily 'do' anything.


In Ancient Egypt there is evidence for both E3a and E3b, which is congruent with other evidence of the central saharan and east african origins of nile valley populations, for example evidence of Benin-Hbs varient in pre-dynastic remains.

Now, the relationship between East, Central and West African populations and Nile Valley Civilisation is complex and can include....
people who lived in Central sahara and migrated East and West. People who lived in the West and migrated East. People who lived in the East and migrated West.

And you have to use other forms of evidence, not just genetics to try and understand these relationships.

thus:

quote:
The Y-chromosome clade defined by the PN2 transition (PN2/M35, PN2/M2) shatters the boundaries of phenotypically defined races and true breeding populations across a great geographical expanse. African peoples with a range of skin colors, hair forms and physiognomies have substantial percentages of males whose Y chromosomes form closely related clades with each other.
- SOY Keita.


But this reply is already too long and has barely addressed the first part of your question so, more later.

ps - I hope you get other responses too especially from Thought and Ausar who certainly know more than I about different aspects of your good question.

[This message has been edited by rasol (edited 17 March 2005).]

IP: Logged

Super car
Member

Posts: 467
Registered: Jan 2005

posted 17 March 2005 03:47 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Super car     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Given the nature of your question, the answer is going to be one heck of a long one, but here goes...


quote:
HERU:

I was talking to a professor online shortly after reading this and brought it up in the conversation. If I remember correctly, he called this a Saharan haplotype. This haplotype should explain any similarities (culturally, religiously, administratively etc) between ancient Egyptians and modern W. Africans, correct?


The E3a mutation most likely arose in the central Saharan region, which explains why the East African populations from the Horn of Africa and upwards don’t have as much of this haplotype. That is not to say the E3a haplotype doesn’t occur at a relatively smaller level, but when compared to central, southern and western African regions, studies in the aforementioned regions show less. In fact in Egypt, E3a occurs more in the Upper Egyptian populations than the Northern portion of the country.

Earlier we had the following studies…

"There exists a west-to-east as well as a south-to-north clinal distribution with respect to E3a-M2.


  • Bamileke and Benin display the highest frequencies (100% and 95.0%, respectively), Kenya and Tanzania show intermediate values, and Oman (7.4%) and Egypt (2.8%) exhibit relatively low percentages of this subclade.

  • In sub-Saharan Africa, the east-to-west clinal distribution of E3b-M35 is inverse to that displayed by E3a-M2. The percentage of these M35 haplogroups is >35% in Tanzania and Egypt, whereas it is less than half of that value in Oman and Kenya.
    The level of this mutation is **very** low in the Tutsi and the Hutu samples (<3% in both) and drops to zero in the more western populations of Cameroon and Benin…

From the above, as you can see the E3a has the highest frequencies in West African sample of Benin and Central African sample of Bamileke. Whereas the frequency drops as one moves to Northeast Africa. You must however note that, the Northernmost population of Egypt is sampled here, not the southern portions of the country. Nevertheless the M2 still occurs there. This could well be an indicator that earlier migrations to the Nile Valley, to the lowermost Nile region, predated the mutation of the M2. Low frequencies here may have been due to contribution of a later migration to the Northernmost Nile. Within Egypt itself, higher frequencies of E3a occurs in the southern populations than the northern ones. Nevertheless compared to central and western Africa, the frequency is still low in this area.

Note that frequency of E3b is highest in East Africa and drops in sub-Saharan west Africa. This again, is not to say E3b doesn’t occur in West Africa, but it does so in much smaller frequencies in the sub-Saharan region. The southernmost occurrence of this haplotype is found in the West African Tauregs, who interestingly are Berber speaking groups. As you move to Northwest Africa, and indeed North Africa, E3b frequencies are high again.
“…the southernmost finding of E-M81 chromosomes on the continent [Africa] is that here reported in the Tuareg from Niger (9.1%), who also speak a Berber language…”


In East Africa, you start to see intermediate results of E3a in the Kenya-Tanzania region, where its occurrence may have been the result of Bantu speaking groups, during migrations into the southern African region. This is why…

“..**Kenya is the northern limit of E3a-M2**, whereas J-12f2, described as a marker of the Neolithic expansion (Semino et al. 2000), extends southward only as far as Ethiopia…Although the E3a-M2 subclade is prevalent in our East African groups (Tutsi, Hutu, Kenya, and Tanzania) as well, these collections contain several additional Y-chromosomal types and, thus, demonstrate a much higher level of NRY diversity. Therefore, unlike its hegemony in the west, E3a-M2's contribution to the genetic landscape of East Africa was **not great enough to completely erase pre-existing Y haplogroups** and may have been **diluted** further by subsequent migratory movements from the north involving other Y chromosomes…When taken in context with previous studies, the current NRY data seem to reflect the linguistic boundaries demarcating southern Kenya as **the northern limit** of the Bantu speakers as they progressed eastward through the Central African corridor and southward along the Swahili coast. Kenya displays an E3a-M2 frequency of 52%, whereas the more northern populations, such as Ethiopia (Underhill et al. 2000; Semino et al. 2002), the Ethiopian Jews (Cruciani et al. 2002), and Sudan (Underhill et al. 2000), are characterized by frequencies **close to or at zero**.…”

*Above quotes are all due to courtesy of University of Chicago studies

In conclusion, E3a mutation must have occurred in western-central Saharan region, which as a result of the desification of the area, led to migrations south, to the West African, central and Southern African regions, while others went to the Nile Valley.

The Saharan rock art tells us that these groups were in close proximity in the fertile Sahara.

Comparing western Sahara art with other portions of the region, which perhaps brings us to your next question…

quote:
Heru:

It seems we have a better understanding of the Saharans that migrated east compared to those that traveled west. When Egypt was united (5,000 BC?), what were these other Saharans doing? Shouldn't there be evidence of "civilization" in or around the western fringes of the Sahara, as old as or older than Egypt?


Unification date of Egypt is also somewhat obscure, but there seems to be some agreement about dating within the vicinity of 3100 B.C., but may well even before that. Archeologists simply go by available artifacts found, but that doesn’t necessarily mean that its conclusive. In fact, the confusion of which one person Menes is, between the Scorpion King and Narmer is testament to this.

“Despite the large distances involved, it appears that the far west of the Sahara around the latitude of 25° N was far from isolated from the remainder of the greater Saharan region. The prehistoric inhabitants of Western Sahara hunted and recorded the same animals as their counterparts in central and eastern regions, and shared the same technologies. As throughout the Sahara, they responded to the same pressures of climatic and environmental desiccation; the location of hearths within wide river channels suggests a congregation around diminishing water resources, while the depiction of a wide variety of more humid- climate fauna indicate Holocene desiccation following a humid phase. ..

[Art]
Further similarities with other Saharan regions are evident in the rock art recorded in the study area, although local stylistic developments are also apparent. Carvings of wild fauna at the site of Sluguilla resemble the Tazina style found in Algeria, Libya and Morocco (Pichler and Rodrigue, 2003), although examples of elephant and rhinoceros in a naturalistic style reminiscent of engravings from the central Sahara believed to date from the early Holocene are also present…Giraffe are represented in paintings at Bou Dheir and Rekeiz, and in engravings at Sluguilla, indicating that they occupied an important role in the lives of the prehistoric peoples of the region, as they did throughout the Sahara (Dupuy, 1999; van Hoek, 2003)…In particular, funerary monuments representing a wide range of typologies reflect the material culture of the central Sahara. Conical tumuli, platform burials and a V-type monument represent structures similar to those found in other Saharan regions and associated with human burials, appearing in sixth millennium BP onwards in northeast Niger and southwest Libya (Sivilli, 2002)…

[Burial practices]
A monument consisting of sixty five stelae was also of great interest; precise alignments north and east, a division of the area covered into separate units, and a deliberate scattering of quartzite inside the structure, are suggestive of an astronomical function associated with funerary rituals. Stelae are also associated with a number of burial sites, again suggesting dual funerary and astronomical functions …” - Courtesy of uea.ac.uk


quote:
That isn't my main question though. What I really want to know is ...what happened? The Saharans that went east ultimately founded Ta-Seti and Egypt respectively. What about the Saharans that went west though? I asked this professor about the physical differences between W. Africans and E. Africans and he told me mixture with Khoisans is why E. Africans tend to look different from their W. African counterparts. The thing is, I always thought Khoisans were all over W. Africa in these times too.

When you say different from their W. African counterparts, I hope you realize that West Africans comprise many groups. You have the Tauregs, the Fulanis, Bantu speaking groups, as well as the non-Bantu groups (like those in Senegal). At any rate, in terms of ancestors of East Africans, we've discussed this here, where the opening notes should be your focus: http://www.egyptsearch.com/forums/Forum8/HTML/001005.html


quote:
Heru:

I've read a little about the Nok and Kintampo cultures. I don't know if these are the earliest signs of "civilization" in W. Africa but they are the oldest I've heard of. How far do these cultures go back? I'm not sure myself but I think it's safe to surmise that they're not nearly as old as the Pre-Dynastic cultures of Upper and Lower Egypt.


The beginnings of the Nok culture is still obscure, and so, any dating available is pure speculation. The dates available in various writings are based on carbon dating of artifacts so far found. As you know, material that perish and cannot be carbon dated, are lost forever in time. Sculptures and iron-smelting furnaces have been located in the location where the Nok culture was supposed to have been based, where modern Nigeria now lies.

Anyway, based on what has been found so far, this may be a reasonable but very brief chronology of what was going on in the Western regions of the continent.

CHRONOLOGY OF ANCIENT WEST AFRICA

After 12,000 BCE: Beginning of a wetter phase in Africa north of the equator. Populations
ancestral to most West Africans make up the foragers and hunters of these lands.

By about 8,000 BCE: Great lakes formed in Niger Bend, Lake Chad and Upper Nile regions.
Spread of 'African aquatic culture' through this 'great lakes' region.
Sedentary fishing communities using pottery and microlithic tools become
established long the shores of lakes and rivers. Saharan region enjoys
savanna-type climate. Favorable conditions lead to population growth.

9,000 to 6,000 BCE: Saharan region in its wettest phases.

By 6,000 BCE: Evidence of domesticated 'humpless' cattle in the Saharan region.
Also seed-cropping (or harvesting) of grains.

6,000-2,500 BCE: Spread of predominantly cattle-raising peoples throughout the Sahara.
Probably ancestral to modern-day Berber groups.

3,000-1,000 BCE: Farming spreads through the former fishing belt of the tropical woodland
savannas and forest margins of West Africa. This Guinea Neolithic era
saw the domestication of millets, rice, sorghum, yams, and palm trees among others.

After 2,500 BCE: Saharan region enters a period of rapid desertification, driving people and larger
game animals to seek better watered lands to the north and south for
habitation. Neolithic settlements spread along the Saharan borderlands and
near rivers and lakes in the West.

1,200-700 BCE: Excavations at Dar Tichitt (modern Mauritania) reveal progression from large,
un-walled lakeside villages to smaller walled hilltop villages in response to
drier climate and increasing pressure from nomads.

After 2,000 BCE: Favorable climatic conditions and developing technology and socio-cultural
systems lead to population growth in the Niger valleys. Neolithic farming
spreading south and east from the area of modern-day Cameroon. Probably
associated with speakers of proto-Bantu languages.

After 500 BCE: Advent of iron-smelting and iron use in West Africa. Height of the civilization
known as Nok, which produced art work ancestral to that of later Yoruba
and lgbo peoples.

WEST AFRICA: C. 800 BCE TO 1591 AD/CE

By 800 BCE Neolithic agricultural peoples inhabit the best lands of the savanna and forest margins. Regional trade networks based on the exchange of salt, fish, pottery, and other regional specialties developing. Small, clan-based villages typical of agricultural areas. Nomads dominate in the drier areas.

-800 to -500 Development of Carthage in the north stimulates exchanges of products across the Sahara Desert, managed by desert Berbers using horses, oxen and chariots. Iron use psreads into the region from the north or east, or both. Larger scale settlements appearing in southern Mauritania. the middle Niger River basin, and the Jos plateau region. These areas correspond respectively to the probable ancestral homes of the modern Soninke (northern Mande); Songhai; and Yoruba peoples.

-500 to -200 Iron use spreads rapidly throughout West Africa, stimulating population growth, trade, and urbanization. Iron-age peoples of Nok (modern Nigeria) produce magnificent terra cotta sculptures stylistically ancestral to later Yoruba and Benin art. Indirect trade continues across increasingly well-marked Saharan trails, still traversed by horse or ox-drawn vehicles.


-800 to +200 Era of Nok civilization. Bantu expansion 'takes off' to the south and east. Earliest towns, such as Jenne, growing up along the Niger on its most northerly stretch.

-100 to +100 Camel use reaches the western Sahara via Berbers living in its southern reaches.

c.100 to 400 CE Camel using Saharan Berber peoples, such as the Taureg and Sanhaja, develop trans-Saharan trade routes, linking the Maghrib and West Africa directly for the first time. Salt, copper, gold, dates, slaves, agricultural produce, manufactured goods and ivory among the goods exchanged. Soninke-led Ghana, Songhai-led Gao grow as middlemen for the expanding commerce. Trade routes also link Nigeria and Lake Chad to North Africa.

400 to 900 Ghana, with its capital at Kumbi Saleh, becomes the first regional "great power." With their control over the southern end of the trans-Saharan trade and the northern end of the gold trade, the Ghana of Wagadu can afford the cavalry necessary to enforce his rule throughout the lands between the Niger and the Senegal Rivers. The trans-Saharan boom stimulates the growth of regional trade in copper, iron and other goods, both agricultural and manufactured.

750 to 1000 Muslim merchants from the North become a major force in trans-Saharan and West African commerce. Islam spreads to Takrur and Ghana. Among the Kanuri of Lake Chad, the Sefawa family founds a dynasty who will rule Kanem for a thousand years. The trans-Saharan trade grows rapidly along with the expansion of the Islamic world. Artists of Igbo Ukwu in southern Nigeria produce fine works in bronze.

ca.1000 Foundation of Ife, the political and spiritual capital of the Yoruba.

1054 to 1070 Almoravid Sanhaja establish control over trans-Saharan routes from the borders of Ghana to Morocco, greatly weakening Ghana.

11th & 12th c. Several Sudannic kings convert to Islam. Commerce in the Sudan gradually comes to be dominated by Muslims, both of local and north African origin.

13th c. Rise of Mali under the great Mande hero, Sundiata Keita. Ghana incorporated into the new great power. From its new capital at Niane on the Niger, Mali develops trade with the developing gold fields of the Akan in modern-day Ghana.

14th c Empire of Mali dominates the Western half of West Africa, controlling the gold and salt trade; promoting Islam; and providing peace and prosperity to its region. Mansa Musa, the best known ruler of Mali, made the pilgrimage to Mecca.

15th c. Mali suffers dynastic difficulties and economic challenges as the gold fields move further south and east. Songhai gains strength. Portuguese merchants begin trading directly with the Akan along the coast of modern Ghana.

16th c. Songhai, with its capital at Gao replaces Mali as the imperial power of West Africa. Islamic learning flourishes with government patronage in the university town of Timbuktu.

1591 Moroccan troops armed with guns cross the desert and defeat the army of Songhai, which break apart within a short time afterwards. -
http://www.homestead.com/wysinger/africanhistory.html

We've also talked about iron-age in Africa here: http://www.egyptsearch.com/forums/Forum8/HTML/001715.html

quote:
Heru:

Ghana (Wagadu) is usually mentioned as the first Sahelian kingdom. I don't think anyone sincerely knows when Ghana was established as a kingdom though. I've noticed a lot of guessing concerning this. I've also noticed a lot of guessing when it comes to the Nok and Kintampo cultures. Websites discussing W. African history usually don't mention the Nok or Kintampo cultures and jump right into Ghana. It also seems like we don't know much about W. African history before the spread of Islam.

Between the onset of Pharonic Egypt and lets say the New Kingdom (1500 BC?), what were these other Saharans doing?


You are right the beginnings of Ghanaian empire is obscure. Most of the datings various historians go by, are from Arabic sources, with whom the West Africans traded in those times. But the nature of trade between these folks, tells us that West Africans were already mature traders by time of the earliest available Arabic writings, concerning these Arabic encounters with West Africans. Needless to say, the Ghanaian empire predates those early records from Arabic trades, and may well have been a mature kingdom by then. At any rate, evidence from Jenne, tells us more about west Africans in that region. The findings there thus far have shown the emergence of a city in that region and a complex culture involving trade.

quote:

THE INTERNAL DEVELOPMENT OF JENNE-JENO
As a result of McIntosh and McIntosh’s precessual archaeological approach to excavating Jenne-Jeno and its hinterland, it has been demonstrated that instead of developing as a result of the trans-Saharan trade, Jenne-Jeno was an indigenous town possessing much earlier origins (Hall 1996: 221).
The earliest occupants of Jenne-Jeno (c. 250 BC - 50 AD) possessed iron and had a subsistence base that was predominantly aquatic, e.g. waterfowl and fish, although bovids are also found that are possible those of the domestic Bos taurus (McIntosh & McIntosh 1981: 15) Permanent mudbrick architecture is lacking, but there are large numbers Saharan affinity sand-tempered pottery (McIntosh & McIntosh 1981: 15).
Phase II (40 - 400 AD) has yielded the earliest known example of African rice -domesticated (McIntosh 1981: 15-16). The cultural continuity from Phase I is demonstrated, amongst others, from the continued faunal dominance of aquatic animals and bovids. Here too is the first permanent mudbrick architecture and this, together with the rice and crowded cemeteries, provides a possible association with the increase in settlement size and a likely rise in population (McIntosh & McIntosh 1981: 16).
It was in late Phase III and early Phase IV (750-1150 AD) that Jenne-Jeno achieved its greatest growth, reaching 33 hectares - a figure to which might be added the adjacent mound of Hambarketolo, connected to Jenne-Jeno via an earthen dike, of 9 hectares - and a population which was ten times greater than that of today (McIntosh &a McIntosh 1981: 16, Hall 1996: 227). The shallower Hambarketolo deposits of 3 metres, suggest a later date for the origin of the city by comparison with and functioning part of Jenne-Jeno at its height (McIntosh & McIntosh 1981: 16-17).
Both Hambarketolo and Jenne-Jeno declined during Phase IV and were abandoned, although the causes are yet unclear (McIntosh & McIntosh 1981: 17). A possible explanation is that the start of the abandonment occurs in the same period as that reported by al-Sa’di for the conversion of Jenne-Jeno to Islam, in the thirteenth century AD (McIntosh & McIntosh 1981: 17).
The excavators hypothesise that the new-converted ruler and/or the elite of Jenne-Jeno founded a new Islamic, city (Jenne) on a new unconnected site (McIntosh & McIntosh 1981: 17). Control of trade belonged to native Muslim merchants and the new city replaced the old as the centre of economic activities, a view reinforced by the surviving historical records (McIntosh & McIntosh 1981: 17).
To examine the extent of urbanism, it is crucial to look closely at the surrounding countryside in an attempt to identify a system of hierarchical settlements on the premise that the city is a settlement providing specialised functions in relations with those around it (McIntosh & McIntosh 1981: 17). Of those 42 sites within the 25km survey area reported by the excavators, none had been abandoned before Phase III whilst roughly three-quarters had by the close of Phase IV (c. 1400 AD). These sites had been occupied for hundreds of years previously (McIntosh & McIntosh 1981: 18). The surrounding lands of Jenne-Jeno display the greatest site density in the late Phase II and early Phase IV, after which decline is evident (McIntosh & McIntosh 1981: 18). All the indirect evidence, including the ceramic and feature categories, points towards Jenne-Jeno being the centre of an integrated settlement hierarchy with its hinterland.
Thus the survey results confirm the archaeological evidence from Jenne-Jeno itself - that there was a rapid development during Phase III between 400-900 AD, and that the survey sites hit their greatest density at roughly the same time (late Phase III - early Phase IV) that Jenne-Jeno reached its largest growth extent (McIntosh & McIntosh 1981: 19). Jenne-Jeno’s decline was part of the general population reorganisation that affected other floodplain settlement sites also in the western Inland Niger Delta, the causes of which are unknown but which preceded the various political disturbances created by the Bambara and Fulani migrations (McIntosh & McIntosh 1981: 19).
The early expansion of Jenne-Jeno in the first centuries of the first millennium was likely due to the local and regional Inland Delta and adjacent area trade networks developing. Its position at the boundary of the two ecology zones of the dry savanna and the Sahel, together with the lack of stone and iron ore on its alluvial plain, gave the settlement great opportunities of involvement as inter-regional trade expanded (McIntosh & McIntosh 1981: 19).
The Inland Niger Delta possess no iron ore right for smelting, and so the slag at Jenne-Jeno and other sites within the survey area mentioned above must have been imported either in the form of iron or bloomery iron that had remnants of slag attached to it (McIntosh & McIntosh 1981: 19). Because of weight and easier and cheaper transport, the latter option is probably the correct one. The excavators believe that the source of the iron ore is Benedougou and that the trade stretches back close to Jenne-Jeno’s origins (McIntosh & McIntosh 1981: 19, 20).
THE INTERNAL DEVELOPMENT OF GHANA
Although the Ghana Empire is the earliest historically documented kingdom in the West African Sahel, it is in fact the second complex political system that arose in this area (Munson 1980: 457). The historical records of Ghana come from Arab sources dating between 800 and 1650 AD, but Ghana had been in existence for long before then and was centred in the present-day Sahal region of south-eastern Mauritania and western Mali. (Munson 1980: 457) - courtesy of Mikey Brass


[This message has been edited by Super car (edited 17 March 2005).]

IP: Logged

rasol
Member

Posts: 2435
Registered: Jun 2004

posted 17 March 2005 07:20 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for rasol     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Excellent reply Supercar.

IP: Logged

Super car
Member

Posts: 467
Registered: Jan 2005

posted 17 March 2005 07:50 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Super car     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by rasol:
Excellent reply Supercar.

Appreciate it. As you can see, it was a somewhat loaded questionaire. Almost encompasses everything we've touched on, on a piece by piece basis.

[This message has been edited by Super car (edited 17 March 2005).]

IP: Logged

All times are GMT (+2)

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | EgyptSearch!

(c) 2003 EgyptSearch.com

Powered by Infopop www.infopop.com © 2000
Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.45c