posted
Big Ups Ta de Docta Winters fe meking dis tread.
Ah Me haffi tell yeh, Dat de people Mek de Corn Rows, an all peeple can Rock dem Rows wether de hair be kinky or straight, de peeple mek de cornrows look Fresh Fresh:
Posts: 9651 | From: Reace and Love City. | Registered: Oct 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
Ah Dat Me Sistahs and Brudda's, we Family from anuda Mudda, an We Hair Is Blessed wether de Hair is Naturally Kinky or Straight. De Peeple Hold Weight
Posts: 9651 | From: Reace and Love City. | Registered: Oct 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
Yeh Must Know, Dat many of de peeple, rep de Boss, who Died Pon De Cross, ah Him a Rose pon day Three, dats how yeh know we Free, so Rep De King of King's, who's coming was a Blessing, Jesus Christ!!!, Ah Him A Give We Life.
Bless
Posts: 9651 | From: Reace and Love City. | Registered: Oct 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
BLACK NATIiVE AMERICANS (with Straight Hair)
Portrait of Ruby Tigertail, Seminole Chokoloskee, Florida, 1910 Josie Billie with family and dog
Posts: 42930 | From: , | Registered: Jan 2010
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Clyde Winters: Hair braiding is a hair style and Mongoloid and Black Native Americans have two different cultural traditions.
THE BLACK NATIVE AMERICANS prefer Corn Rows (with Braided Hair)
' Mongoloid Native Americans have a cultural tradition of wearing two long braids, one on each side of their heads
It appears that having straight hair prevents mongoloid Indians from doing corn rows. [/QB]
Both my great grand mother and grandmother wore their hair in this style even at the age of 90+.
Posts: 4693 | From: Saturn | Registered: Apr 2012
| IP: Logged |
posted
Mike, how did you figure out, that those East African women is related to the figurine?
Posts: 22235 | From: האם אינכם כילדי הכרית אלי בני ישראל | Registered: Nov 2010
| IP: Logged |
Has anyone ever seen an authentic image of an Inca who looked even remotely like what the Vile Racists Liars have created?
Africans take note!
.
EXCEPT FOR THESE PEOPLE!
THIS IS THE FIRST, EVEN REMOTELY ACCURATE, IMAGE OF A PALEOAMERICAN (CREATED BY ALBINOS) THAT I HAVE EVER SEEN. (Other than the scientific reconstructions).
(BLACK) Inca warrior with gold ornaments
. Problem is, I have no idea what museum it is in.Posts: 22721 | Registered: Oct 2005
| IP: Logged |
can somebody find a good match for this, a photo of a person similar, not just an earring match
Posts: 42930 | From: , | Registered: Jan 2010
| IP: Logged |
posted
A PaleoAmerican White Mike come on now,of course not. Looks like an Amerindian to me. Why would he be White when there were NO Whites in the Americas prior to the Vikings.
Posts: 3257 | From: Madisonville, KY USA | Registered: Nov 2011
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by CelticWarrioress: A PaleoAmerican White Mike come on now,of course not. Looks like an Amerindian to me. Why would he be White when there were NO Whites in the Americas prior to the Vikings.
I think you misunderstood Mike, again. He did not ask if it was a white man. If the hunk would walk up to you what would you see how would you feel, that is what he is asking.
Do you think Vikings arrived at Costa Rica or any other place in the Americas. And if so, how?
Posts: 22235 | From: האם אינכם כילדי הכרית אלי בני ישראל | Registered: Nov 2010
| IP: Logged |
posted
From what I've heard there are many different ethnic groups amongst the Amerindians, who also have different traits. Can anyone list them, perhaps?
Costa Rica has an estimated population of 4,579,000 people.
It's safe to say that most modern Costa Ricans are mestizos, though they say white. perhaps they are confused or uncertain. (for those who don't know, a mestizo is an Amerindian with european ancestry)
"The indigenous population today numbers about 60,000 (1% of the population) with some Miskito and Garifuna (a population of mixed black African and Carib Indian descent) living in the coastal regions."
Posts: 22235 | From: האם אינכם כילדי הכרית אלי בני ישראל | Registered: Nov 2010
| IP: Logged |
The population of Costa Rica has been considered valuable for locating susceptibility genes of complex disorders because of historical events and a gradual admixture process. We present an assessment of 426 unrelated individuals with a familial history of mental disorder and with ancestors born in the Central Valley, genotyped at 730 microsatellites to evaluate genetic diversity, ancestry and substructure at the general and regional population levels using quantitative methods. Low population substructure was found. Estimated mean ancestry proportions were 54%, 32% and 13% for European, Amerindian and African components respectively, with some regional variation. The Fst values obtained confirm the largest genetic similarity to Europeans. Subdivision of the Amerindians into individual populations revealed strong similarity to Chibchan groups. Analysis of the African ancestry showed high similarity to West and Central African populations. Gene ancestries from other African areas were also detected, probably resulting from ancestral admixture within Africa prior to colonial times. Our analyses show, in an ethnohistorical-genetic context, that gene flow and admixture are important components of Costa Rican population history. The results confirm the need to consider the particular regional genetic structure, the effects of genetic drift and the ancestry when designing and interpreting investigations of genetic traits in this population.
[...]
The history of the Costa Rican population, as well as other populations in Latin America (Sans, 2000), involves a complex process of admixture, mainly between groups of Amerindian, European and African ancestry, which constituted a multiethnic population by the 18th century (Meléndez, 1982; Lohse, 2005). However, most population genetic studies in the last 30 years in Costa Rica have focused primarily on Amerindian groups (Barrantes et al., 1990; Wang et al., 2007) and a few on African groups (Madrigal, 2006). Detailed investigations of the admixed population structure and ancestry are scant, and those available include a small number of individuals and markers, or include only specific geographic regions (Morera et al., 2003; Campos-Sánchez et al., 2006; Wang et al., 2008), limiting the understanding of the genetic constitution of this population, and therefore, its value for the detection of susceptibility genes. Additionally, inference of the geographic origin of individuals is difficult to ascertain using data from broad ethnohistorical and anthropological investigations. Consequently, a thorough multidisciplinary approach, including genetic evidence, is necessary to determine the sources from which individuals originated and to estimate the proportions in which different parental populations contributed to the admixture process. Considering the above statements, this investigation intended to describe the nuclear genetic variability and the population substructure of the Costa Rican population descended from Central Valley ancestors, and to determine the possible ancestry of the populations that gave rise to the current admixed population
quote:Spanish Conquest and Colonizing of Costa Rica
Costa Rica was the site of many conquests by Spain on both the Pacific and Atlantic coasts. Christopher Columbus landed in 1502 in Limon on the Atlantic side.
Columbus made four voyages to the new world. Contrary to popular opinion, he never landed on the soil of the United States of America. During his fourth voyage to the new world, with a goal of still finding a route to the Indian Ocean, he discovered Central America. On this route, after a brief stop in Jamaica, Columbus sailed to Central America arriving at Guanaja (Isla de Pinos) in the Bay Islands off the coast of Honduras, on July 30. On August 14th, he landed at Puerto Castilla near Trujillo, Honduras. He spent two months exploring the coasts of Honduras, Nicaragua and Costa Rica before arriving at Almirante Bay, Panama on October 16.
Like many other countries, the Spanish conquest brought disease and hardship. Bacteria and viruses actually came before the Spanish landed and the population of Costa Rica was very small by the time the Spanish actually arrived and started trying to colonize. The Spanish had a hard time colonizing. The people of Costa Rica fought being colonized often with armed resistance or just escaping in the mountain forests or the jungles. Eventually some colonies did come to exist; however, the settlers here did not find the same riches as settlers in other countries did. They were the poorest and they had few slaves to do the heavy labor. They did make slaves of some of the Costa Ricans and they imported slaves from the Caribbean. However, because there were so few slaves, the price of the slaves were very high. Because of the value of the slaves, they were treated as an investment and much better than in other countries. The slaves also had a method for purchasing their freedom and often masters gave slaves their freedom in their wills.
Christopher Columbus in recent years has become a controversial figure in Costa Rica. While he was the first European to land on Costa Rican soil, his presence and the process of colonization ended up bringing much suffering to the people of Costa Rica as a whole. Because of this, what was Columbus Day has been changed to a Culture Day where the people of Costa Rica can appreciate all of the cultural influences upon the country.
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
[/qb]
![[Cool]](cool.gif)
:
Printer-friendly view of this topic