posted
I was recently looking up and researching police brutality statistics online, and I came upon this video; of a debate and argument between a prominent White Canadian dude with a popular online radio show, that depicts itself as all American and new generation and espousing right wing sentiments at the same time; vs Phile advise a black guy with an online show that speaks about issues and problems pertaining to the Black community in America.....
Basically most of the video revolves around Steven implying Phil is a liar, because Phil supposedly doesn't use direct statistics to prove and support his position about police brutality against Black people in America, but instead relies too much of hard direct anecdotal accounts.
And then Steven resorts to the typical Euro albino tactic of setting up and framing the argument in such a way, as to use his sources in a bogus way of arguing, where he limits the entire argument to arguments of authority by some organization espousing questionable statistics, and framing the argument that because X organization said this and this statistic, thererfore Y....
That's my impression, what do you guys think?
Posts: 1558 | From: US | Registered: Sep 2015
| IP: Logged |
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
Printer-friendly view of this topic