[KKey178 writes] Marc ... maybe I'm you giving you too much credit.
[Marc writes] I hadn’t said a word to you and you trash me with a pjeroative comment: “maybe I’m giving you too much credit.”
It’s because you imitated Djehuti and Rasol by fabricating a self-image of yourself as some towering Goliath of supreme intellect looking down on the rest of us; the rest of us that you three have the gall to giddily look upon as detestible, putrid scum; it’s because it’s the way you three frame interactions with others and with me that I do everything in my power to show my disdain by copying your style and throwing it back in your face.
That’s why I said in this page, speaking of you, that your head has a hole in it.
As time went by, another time I’d not been speaking to you and in reply to someone you said (paraphrasing) I was a “babbling, incoherent fool.”
So, I added that to a bubble on my page trashing you.
Then, again when I was not addressing you, you wrote to someone that I was a “an idiotic, derelectic jackass.” So, I added that in a bubble on my page above trashing you as you addressing yourself.
Then, you write that I write “delusional, outrageous claims.” So, I added that in a bubble on my page above trashing you as you addressing yourself.
Now, most recently, you disparage me yet again saying maybe I'm you giving you too much credit.
And on Nov. 18, 2008 you continue with your arsenic-laced sarcasm even when I had not written to you – you initiate hostilities out of the blue dissing me, … so tell me, from your limited understanding ...
You three (you, Djehuti, and Rasol) are incredible racists. I don’t know why you belong to Egypt Search as you three hate the guts of the blacks at Egypt Search even as you fawn over and deify our African ancestors who are the parents of humanity. That is schizophrenic.
In your last comment to me you write, Marc will you even try to answer?
as if you are sincerely looking for my response and as if you are sincerely interested in my opinion on the matter.
However, there are those four diatribes above where you lash-out at me and in three out of the four cases, I’d not even addressed you.
Your behavior is schizophrenic and you have no goodwill in your heart. You and your friends Djehuti (who is sick to compare himself to the near godlike Djehuti of ancient Egypt), and Rasol have loathing towards blacks.
You three are capable of offering an olive branch speaking well of a person in one post and the next ten posts to that person are laced with name-calling, put-downs, and contempt.
You are duplicitous, ill-willed, insincere, and arrogant. You are poisonous snakes laying in the grass waiting to strike out at others and I want to have nothing to do with you.
. .
-------------------- The nature of homelife is the fate of the nation. Posts: 2334 | Registered: May 2006
| IP: Logged |
quote:Marc writes: As time went by, another time I’d not been speaking to you and in reply to someone you said (paraphrasing) I was a “babbling, incoherent fool.”
^ Indeed, and your photoshop stinks too. Posts: 15202 | Registered: Jun 2004
| IP: Logged |
Several types of blacks entered the Americas including the San, Anu or negrito type and the Proto-Saharan variety of blacks. Up until recently it was believed that the first humans crossed the Bering Strait 12,000 B.P., to enter the North American continent.(Begley 1991, p.15) This view was never accepted by physical anthropologists who have found skeletal remains far older than 12,000 B.P.
Today archaeologists have found sites from Argintina to Chile that range between 20,000 and 40,000 years old. There are numerous sites in South America which are over 35,000 years old (1).
Pedra Furada Engravings and pebbles
These sites are Pedra Furada (c.45,000 B.C.) (2,2a), and Serra Da Capivara 50,000 BP. The Pedra Furada site is quite old(2b).Archaeologist originally dated the site 48k-10kya (2d).
At Pedra Furada, Brazil archaeologists have found cave paintings, hearths and deliberately flaked pebbles (2b). All evidence of human occupation of the site. Charcoal samples from the campsite increased the age of the site to 65kya (2c,2d).
Given the fact that the earliest dates for habitation of the American continent occur below Canada in South America is highly suggestive of the fact that the earliest settlers on the American continents came from Africa before the Ice melted at the Bering Strait and moved northward as the ice melted.
The appearance of pebble tools at Monte verde in Chile (c.32,000 B.P), and rock paintings at Pedra Furada in Brazil (c.22,000 B.P.) and mastodont hunting in Venezuela and Colombia (c.13,000 B.P.), and Dr. Walter Neves’ discovery of a 12,000 year old skeleton of an African woman in Brazil, have led some researchers to believe that the Americas was first settled from South America (4).
C. Vance Haynes noted that:"If people have been in South America for over 30,000 years, or even 20,000 years, why are there so few sites?....One possible answer is that they were so few in number; another is that South America was somehow initially populated from directions other than north until Clovis appeared"(5).
P.S. Martin and R. G. Klein after discussing the evidence of mastodont hunting in Venezuela 13,000 years ago observed that :"The thought that the fossil record of South America is much richer in evidence of early archaeological associations than many believed is indeed provocative .Have the earliest hunters been overlooked in North America? Or did the hunters somehow reach South America first" (6)?
2. Ibid, p.107; "Man's New World arrival Pushed back", Chicago Tribune, (9 May 1991) Sec.1A, p.40;and A.L. Bryan, "Points of Order". Natural History , (June 1987) pp.7-11.
2a.Meltzer, David J., James M. Adovasio, and Tom D. Dillehay 1994 On a Pleistocene human occupation at Pedra Furada, Brazil. Antiquity 68(261):695-714.
2b.Parenti, Fabio, Michel Fontugue, and Claude Guerin 1996 Pedra Furada in Brazil and its 'presumed' evidence: limitations and potential of the available data. Antiquity 70:416-421.
2c.Santos, G. M., et al. 2003 A revised chronology of the lowest occupation layer of Pedra Furada Rock Shelter, Piauí, Brazil: the Pleistocene peopling of the Americas. Quaternary Science Reviews 22 2303–2310.
2d.Valladas, H., et al. 2003 TL age-estimates of burnt quartz pebbles from the Toca do Boqueirão da Pedra Furada (Piaui, Northeastern Brazil). Quaternary Science Reviews 22(10-13):1257-1263.
3. Bryan, p.11.
4. C.V. Haynes,Jr.,"Geofacts and Fanny". Natural History ,(February 1988)pp.4-12:12.
5. P.S. Martin and R.G.Klein (eds.),Quarternary Extinctions: A Prehistoric Revolution, (Tucson:University of Arizona Press,1989) p.111.
6. M.Ruhlen,"Voices from the Past". Natural History, (March 1987) pp.6-10:10; J.H. Greenberg,Language in the Americas. Stanford:Stanford University Press,1987.
1. Laboratório de Estudos Evolutivos Humanos, Departamento de Genética e Biologia Evolutiva, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade de São Paulo, 05508-090 São Paulo, Brazil
Edited by Richard G. Klein, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, and approved October 28, 2005 (received for review August 18, 2005)
Comparative morphological studies of the earliest human skeletons of the New World have shown that, whereas late prehistoric, recent, and present Native Americans tend to exhibit a cranial morphology similar to late and modern Northern Asians (short and wide neurocrania; high, orthognatic and broad faces; and relatively high and narrow orbits and noses), the earliest South Americans tend to be more similar to present Australians, Melanesians, and Sub-Saharan Africans (narrow and long neurocrania; prognatic, low faces; and relatively low and broad orbits and noses). However, most of the previous studies of early American human remains were based on small cranial samples. Herein we compare the largest sample of early American skulls ever studied (81 skulls of the Lagoa Santa region) with worldwide data sets representing global morphological variation in humans, through three different multivariate analyses. The results obtained from all multivariate analyses confirm a close morphological affinity between SouthAmerican Paleoindians and extant Australo-Melanesians groups, supporting the hypothesis that two distinct biological populations could have colonized the New World in the Pleistocene/Holocene transition.
quote:Haplotypes Point to a Single, Recent Entry of Native American Y Chromosomes into the Americas Stephen L. Zegura 1, Tatiana M. Karafet 2, Lev A. Zhivotovsky 3, and Michael F. Hammer 4*
A total of 63 binary polymorphisms and 10 STRs were genotyped on a sample of 2,344 Y chromosomes from 18 Native American, 28 Asian, and 5 European populations to investigate the origin(s) of Native American paternal lineages. All three of Greenberg's major linguistic divisions (including 342 Amerind speakers, 186 Na-Dene speakers, and 60 Aleut-Eskimo speakers) were represented in our sample of 588 Native Americans. SNP analysis indicated that three major haplogroups, denoted as C, Q, and R, accounted for nearly 96% of Native American Y chromosomes. Haplogroups C and Q were deemed to represent early Native American founding Y-chromosome lineages; however, most haplogroup R lineages present in Native Americans most likely came from recent admixture with Europeans. Although different phylogeographic and STR diversity patterns for the two major founding haplogroups previously led to the inference that they were carried from Asia to the Americas separately, the hypothesis of a single migration of a polymorphic founding population better fits our expanded database. Phylogenetic analyses of STR variation within haplogroups C and Q traced both lineages to a probable ancestral homeland in the vicinity of the Altai Mountains in Southwest Siberia. Divergence dates between the Altai plus North Asians versus the Native American population system ranged from 10,100 to 17,200 years for all lineages, precluding a very early entry into the Americas.
Posts: 6572 | From: N.Y.C....Capital of the World | Registered: Jun 2008
| IP: Logged |
quote:results obtained from all multivariate analyses confirm a close morphological affinity between SouthAmerican Paleoindians and extant Australo-Melanesians groups, supporting the hypothesis that two distinct biological populations could have colonized the New World in the Pleistocene/Holocene transition.
^ Same author he uses to claim San, by confusing x and y chromosome.
Thing about Winters and Marc is - anyone can bust them - an eventually will.
It's not even challenging.
Posts: 15202 | Registered: Jun 2004
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Pulp: Marc you’re some sort of schizo. You’re the one who has white mans blood flowing through your veins plus you’re married to a European Hungarian woman
Say it aint so you are married to a Skunk bunny white woman Marc?!?!
Dude what is the deal with all these Afrocentrics marrying and dating out of their race?
I have come to the conclusion that the reason Afrocentrics talk about everything but Africa is because they deep down have contempt for it and think that being on par with a European is to claim a non African lifestyle, look and culture. Why else would they date the very people that they say are their enemies?
SICK!!!!
That's like Mary Leftkowitz being married to a black NFL player.
Why do people of African descent hate themselves so much Posts: 152 | Registered: Sep 2008
| IP: Logged |
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
![[Big Grin]](biggrin.gif)
![[Mad]](mad.gif)
![[Eek!]](eek.gif)
Printer-friendly view of this topic