Latin and Celtic began as monosyllabic languages spoken (phenotypically speaking) by Africans.
Consider the three words below: tirelessness, shamlessly, comfortable. What is commonly shared among them and all Latin words? Each syllable has an individual meaning which when agglutinated gives a complex meaning which is the sum of the individual roots.
Now, look at the web page below which was inspired by a book Alan Mitchell shared with me by Thomas Shore THE ORIGIN OF THE ANGLO-SAXON. The images on the web page below show an African people as your early Romans and image 10 shows African canoeists from 3000 BC in Yorkshire as additional evidence of an early African presence in Britain. The early speakers of Latin (and many stella show Africans with Latin inscriptions before whites were depicted with Latin inscriptions) were assuredly African.
Here are some of the the people in the images had in their language:
ROMAN TERMS Chester: fort, camp (In Philadelphia, we have a Chester) Port: harbour Street: paved way
CELTIC TERMS Mawr: big Mor: sea (Moor = seaman) Bryn: Hill (In Philadelphia is Bryn Mawr and it is on a big hill) Plas: palace
That (observe the words below) that the syllables have individual meanings can only mean that the language Latin emerged from was monosyllabic.
I believe that the day will come when historians will recognize the monosyllabic nature of the first spoken form of Latin and that Africans will be one day attributed as being the original founders of the language and its first speakers.
Tirelessness: the state of being without weariness TIRE-Root=Tire. Meaning: become weary LESS-Suffix=without NESS-Suffix=state of
Shamelessly: done without decency or modesty SHAME-Root-painful emotion from doing something dishonorable LESS-Suffix=without LY-Suffix=in the manner of
Comfortable: free from affliction or pain COM-Prefix-with FORT-(fortis)-Latin Root = strength ABLE-Suffix=can do
posted
this thread needs to be stickied!! it should become the poster child for how the mind of an afroflunky processes its pseudo information!
RFLOL!! this right here is the bomb!
IronLion Member # 16412
posted
Marc
I have seen where irish and Scottish claim that Mohr means big or great. What is your opinion?
BTW the first king of Scotland was called Fergus Mohr. I always thought he was a moor, but you never know. What is your take?
Lion!
Marc Washington Member # 10979
posted
. .
Iron. I have only seen a single reference to Mohr in the phonetic equivalent Mawr and in and around Philadelphia is Bryn Mawr.
It is two towns down and up the hill from where I went to college - Haverford. I used to take the intercollegiate bus there for classes and clearly remember riding up that hill to Bryn Mawr which was at the top.
It is also one of the richest communities in America. So the meaning of "big" takes on additional symbolism.
The name of "Big" is a family name elsewhere. In Hungary, the word for "big" is "nagy" and many people are called "Nagy." Grandmother and grandfather are, respectively, nagymama and nagypapa.
I think your understanding of "Mohr" as "big" is correct but I have only anecdotal proof and no more.
posted 
