posted
I went over to the conservative Daily Mail to check on Anglo-P's post about the Pakistani girl wounded in a gang warfare exchange. Just very unfortunate, those young gangsters should be punished to the max.
However while browsing that newspaper by dint of serendipity I found the following--which is what Anglo-P should have posted in the first place--LOL.
Back to the Pakistani girl. If those gangsters were heads of state, Obama, Sakozy, and Cameron, plus the rest of the NATO gangsters, they would just dismiss that kind of event as just "collateral damage". And the Daily Mail would not have said a word.
Proof: Obama, Sakozy, and Cameron slaughtered over 40,000 innnocents in Libya by their daily bombardment of children and their non-combatant parents. Obama has boasted about his constant drone bombings of what he calls "terrorists"--even though hundred even thousands of innocent "collateral damage" has been admitted. Where is the Western media outrage?
Those 3 thugs deserve the imprisonment they will get for their "collateral damage". I wish the same for Obama, Sarkozy,and Cameron, but nothing will happen to them. These 3 heads of state gang-bangers will just keep on killing and the Daily Mail will just shrug.
posted
The headline of the article is quite misleading in that it proposes that Europeans left Europe and went into Africa to escape the frigid Ice Ages.
But that's not what the research says. The key points--known already to some ES posters--is that 33% of the genetics of modern Europeans comes recently from so-called Sub-Saharan African(racist euphemism for "black Africa") migrations into Europe and that the other 66% is even more recent--as shown by L MtDNA.
Anglo_Pyramidologist Member # 18853
posted
^ Utter nonsense...
What is this 33%?
Are you talking about E1b1b?
It originated on the Horn of Africa, and has nothing to do with Negroids.
Caucasoids predate Negroids in East Africa by thousands of years, Negroids only moved into north and eastern africa as late as the Bantu expansion.
-Just Call Me Jari- Member # 14451
posted
quote:35 per cent of sub-Saharan genetic traces in Europe are from prehistory
Hmm, so it gives you insight onto the fact that Blacks were active in Early Europe and Med. Culture.
quote:A third of the genetic traces of sub-Saharan lineages in today's Europe come from prehistory.
Important to keep in mind that we're talking extant lineages. When extinct lineages are taken into account, the actual proportion of prehistoric L lineages vs the historic L lineages that made it to Europe is much larger, almost certainly even dominating. Recent finds of L lineages up to almost 50% in certain Ancient Iberian samples speaks to this. We also know that people who were in a significant phenotypical agreement with them, were all over Paleolithic, Mesolithic, Neolithic and Bronze age Europe, according to Brace, Angel, Pinhasi, and others.
lamin Member # 5777
posted
quote:Utter nonsense...
What is this 33%?
Are you talking about E1b1b?
It originated on the Horn of Africa, and has nothing to do with Negroids.
Just a pathetic ignorance again. This intellectual tyro a nd lightweight believes he can corner scientific truth by quoting and referencing racist and pseudo-scientific quack anthropologists like Coon and Baker who have been dismissed by serious scientists as silly cranks.
This cognitively challenged Pict has not the slightest clue as to how science progresses. He doesn't know that pseudo theories like the Phlogiston theory and the ether theory and many others have been long dismissed.
The fact is that Salas and his team claimed "sub-Saharan"--which in the racist lingo of Euro-science means any area south of the North Africa. If the reference were specifically to the East African Horn it would have said so.
But proof of this ignoramus's claim about the Salas research is that it is not about Y DNA but about MtDNA.
The Grimaldi "Negroid" hypothesis has been put aside--perhaps for political reasons--but this Salas thesis could well revive it.
Thesis: Africans went North into Europe and were transmuted into depigmented Europeans when the last Ice Age hit.
Back again to this LOL thing about "whose yur daddy now"?
lamin Member # 5777
posted
quote:Researchers think that Europeans 'pushed south' by glaciers might have met with populations from sub-Saharan Africa.
But what were the origins of these Europeans supposedly "pushing South" to begin with ?
As noted, the article itself is actually distorting the research in an attempt to hide the claim that modern Europeans descend from so-called "Sub-Saharan" Africans.
Troll Patrol Member # 18264
posted
quote:Originally posted by pseudo Anglo_Pyramidologist who has never been to Egypt: ^ Utter nonsense...
What is this 33%?
Are you talking about E1b1b?
It originated on the Horn of Africa, and has nothing to do with Negroids.
Caucasoids predate Negroids in East Africa by thousands of years, Negroids only moved into north and eastern africa as late as the Bantu expansion.
lol at this dumb turd. University wanna-be student.
posted 
