...
EgyptSearch Forums Post A Reply
my profile | directory login | register | search | faq | forum home

» EgyptSearch Forums » Deshret » @DhDoxie » Post A Reply

Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon: Icon 1     Icon 2     Icon 3     Icon 4     Icon 5     Icon 6     Icon 7    
Icon 8     Icon 9     Icon 10     Icon 11     Icon 12     Icon 13     Icon 14    
Message:

HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.

 

Instant Graemlins Instant UBB Code™
Smile   Frown   Embarrassed   Big Grin   Wink   Razz  
Cool   Roll Eyes   Mad   Eek!   Confused    
Insert URL Hyperlink - UBB Code™   Insert Email Address - UBB Code™
Bold - UBB Code™   Italics - UBB Code™
Quote - UBB Code™   Code Tag - UBB Code™
List Start - UBB Code™   List Item - UBB Code™
List End - UBB Code™   Image - UBB Code™

What is UBB Code™?
Options


Disable Graemlins in this post.


 


T O P I C     R E V I E W
claus3600
Member # 19584
 - posted
Doxie

I've read that you use the term 'pseudo scholar'to presumably describe African-American academics who argue that the Ancient Egyptians were black Africans.

Could you give your definition of 'pseudo scholar'? Diop and Obenga wiped the floor with the 18 or so hostile academics in the peopling of the Nile symposium 73-74. Are they pseudo scholars? Robin Walker and Runoko Rashidi demolished Oxford Don Stephen. Are Walker and Rashidi pseudo scholars?

How confident would you be debating the so-called 'pseudo scholars' on whether the Ancient Egyptians were black Africans?

I'm giving serious consideration to doing MAs in Egyptology and Bio-Anthropology here in London, followed up by a Ph.D in Egyptology. Given that my academic approach would be that the Egyptians were black Africans, would that make me a 'pseudo scholar'?
 
Sahel (Siptah)
Member # 17601
 - posted
dude, not everyone is going to agree with you. it's just how it is. just focus on what you need to do and do you. doxie is society's average white girl. why do you care so much what she has to say about you?
 
claus3600
Member # 19584
 - posted
I don't. I'm seeking entertainment.
 
magazine
Member # 6729
 - posted
get back to your bedroom and wait for me. [Roll Eyes]


[Big Grin]
 
DHDoxies
Member # 19701
 - posted
Sorry dude not gonna take the bait. BTW, I could care a less about the Ancient Egyptians, Cass has even chastised me on several occasions for saying they weren't White & well probably will again now LOL.
 
Anglo_Pyramidologist
Member # 18853
 - posted
quote:
Originally posted by DHDoxies:
Sorry dude not gonna take the bait. BTW, I could care a less about the Ancient Egyptians, Cass has even chastised me on several occasions for saying they weren't White & well probably will again now LOL.

I said to avoid non-scientific terminology.

'White' is not anthropological valid, neither is 'Black'.

AE was a Caucasoid civilization. I would probably breakdown its subracial composition as follows: Mediterranid (80%), Arabid (10%), Nordid (5%), Armenoid (3%), Alpine (1%), Turanid (1%).

Negroids only arrived in AE, as late as c. 2000 BC as slaves.
 
Anglo_Pyramidologist
Member # 18853
 - posted
quote:
Given that my academic approach would be that the Egyptians were black Africans, would that make me a 'pseudo scholar'?
Afrocentrism is rejected, and is pseudo-history.

The mainstream view regarding ancient Egypt and race, is that the AE's were 'North Africans'.

Everyone knows North Africans are Caucasoid. Its just that political correctness has now restricted most scholars using Caucasoid or racial terminology, so instead they just say 'North African'. Same thing though...

A typical North African looks like this -

 -
 
Mike111
Member # 9361
 - posted
quote:
Originally posted by Anglo_Pyramidologist:
quote:
Originally posted by DHDoxies:
Sorry dude not gonna take the bait. BTW, I could care a less about the Ancient Egyptians, Cass has even chastised me on several occasions for saying they weren't White & well probably will again now LOL.

I said to avoid non-scientific terminology.

'White' is not anthropological valid, neither is 'Black'.

AE was a Caucasoid civilization. I would probably breakdown its subracial composition as follows: Mediterranid (80%), Arabid (10%), Nordid (5%), Armenoid (3%), Alpine (1%), Turanid (1%).

Negroids only arrived in AE, as late as c. 2000 BC as slaves.

Ha,ha,ha:

Here is one for you Cass - Idiotoid!

Or how about Delusionoid, or Albinoid?

Ha,ha,ha:

Take something Cass.
 
the lioness
Member # 17353
 - posted
^^^notice Nordid (5%)

there goes the Nordic Egypt concept, even if 5% it's pretty small
 
claus3600
Member # 19584
 - posted
@Anglo

I would probably pull some made up figures out my arse...

@Doxie

Sorry dude not gonna take the bait.

You throw around 'pseudo scholar' but won't define what you mean. And no, you wouldn't publicly debate said pseudo scholars because you know that they are actually experts.

I'll tell you something, I'm confident that in a debate between so-called 'Afro-centrists' and mainstream Egyptologists on whether the Egyptians were black Africans, the 'Afro-centrists' would present a far more convincing - nay, irrefutable - case.

What do you reckon?

This question also to Anglo and the Lioness.
 



Contact Us | EgyptSearch!

(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com

Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3