...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Deshret
»
DNAtribes analysis on Tel Amarna mummies
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Truthcentric: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Swenet: [qb] [IMG]http://i42.tinypic.com/b96ao0.jpg[/IMG] Now would you look at that. Horners totally lag behind in closeness to mid 18th dy pharaoh's when it comes to these STR profiles. Not just [i]behind[/i] Western, Central and Southern Africans; they're [i]totally dwarfed[/i] by Bantu Speakers when it comes to closeness to 18th dy pharaoh's, in frequencies of these particular STR profiles. At the end of the day, genetics have the last word when stacked up against craniofacial analysis (which typically favors Horners as [i]among[/i] the closest to AE). What African peoples are the closest to Ancient Egyptians? One things for sure though, plenty of ammunition for Clyde's ''inner African Egypt''. I'm not poking fun of him anymore; perhaps its time to review, or at least add nuance what seems to have become the consensus. The severe cases sickle cell in predynastic AE mummies, AE bacteria associated with inner Africa, high levels Sub-Saharan Nry markers (M60) in modern Egyptians that only reach modest levels in the Horn, and now this. The plot thickens.. [/qb][/QUOTE]The South and Central African ties surprised me too. Then again, the Nile does flow from one of the Great Lakes, so perhaps this indicates ancient Egyptians having ancestry from further upriver? [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3