...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Deshret
»
DNAtribes analysis on Tel Amarna mummies
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Truthcentric: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by .Charlie Bass.: [qb] [QUOTE]Originally posted by cassiterides: [qb] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Truthcentric: I would have liked to see them break down those regional clusters so we would have an idea of exactly which ethnic groups were closest to Egyptians. Given the South African connections, they would totally grab headlines if they invoked the Zulu as close relatives of the Egyptians. [/QUOTE]South African = Capoid. The study (not that its to be trusted as its not peer-reviewed) clusters those egyptian mummies closest to Capoids who are non-negroid. The afronuts are basically debunking themselves. :rolleyes: [/qb][/QUOTE]No dumbass, read http://www.dnatribes.com/pops-africa.html [/qb][/QUOTE]To be fair, Khoisan peoples are listed among the African populations. However, considering how closely "Negroid" Africans of the Rift Valley and West Africa fall behind in affinity to the Egyptians, and also that some Southern Africans are Bantu rather than Khoisan, casshole fails nonetheless. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3