...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Deshret
»
Keita's Cambridge Workshop and Nat Geo Videos
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by MindoverMatter718: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by akoben: [qb]Bowcock does not advance [/qb][/QUOTE]This is what Bowcock advances.... [i]Tree constructed by maximum likelihood, [b]assuming a model of admixture between ancestral Africans and ancestral Asians, fitting the distances of the lower triangle of Table 1.[/b] According to this model two divergent populations contribute in specified proportions to form a new population. [b]*Various*[/b] pairs of [b]*ancestral populations*[/b] from which the European branch [b]*may have*[/b] descended by [b]*admixture were tested*[/b] for choosing ancestral types that contributed to the admixture. [b]Data were found to be most consistent with this tree; ancestral Europeans are estimated to be an admixture of 65% ancestral Chinese and 35% ancestral Africans.[/b] -- Bowcock et al. [/i] [QUOTE]Originally posted by akoben: [qb] And are you saying then that Asians are unconnected genetically with the African? They came about in a vacuum? [/qb][/QUOTE]This is what I'm saying..... [b](2) Genetically differentiated[/b] , is confirmed through independently originating lineages which are available for geneticists to detect(Asian, African etc..). I.e, E3b is post OOA African, J is Asian. Both present in Europeans as well. Feel free to disprove the fact that we are able to tell when a population is admixed or not through genes...?? Of course as always unaddressed, and unrefuted Therefore.... Fact remains unrefuted: Europeans are mixed between two morphologically and genetically differentiated groups, and hence are hybrids. ...and supra Saharan Africans are not admixed as Europeans are, hence are not hybrids, [b]or atleast their intermediate biological characteristics can not be primarily explained as result of said hybridization, as the mixed Europeans(Asian and African) are.[/b] As explained by Keita.... [i]The "intermediate" biological characteristics of supra Saharan Africans are not easily explained as primarily the result of hybridization.[/i] [b]---Keita [/b] Feel free to name the non Asian, and non African derived lineages in the European gene pool, that would refute the fact that Europeans are totally Asian and African derived as the two maps posted confirm.. Feel free to name European specific underived lineages? If you can't do this, obviously there is no more to discuss, you're dismissed, and I am done with you.. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3