...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Deshret
»
Colorlines in Classical North Africa
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Antalas: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Djehuti: [qb] ^ "Natufians are notably distant from any African populations." Any?? So now the Moroccan Iberomaurusian and Moroccan EN in your map are not Africans either?! [IMG]https://media.tenor.com/91xjtSzXm6YAAAAC/crowd-laughing.gif[/IMG] I suggest you stop posting in this blog or any blog for that matter and seek psychiatric help. [/qb][/QUOTE]Yes natufians are notably distant from my iberomaurusian ancestors too : [IMG]https://i.imgur.com/ouK1Ixy.jpg[/IMG] [QUOTE] [b]Although, ADMIXTURE analysis pointed to some relationship between IAM and Levantine aDNA samples, especially the Natufians, this is not supported by FST distances[/b] . [/QUOTE] https://www.pnas.org/content/pnas/suppl/2018/06/11/1800851115.DCSupplemental/pnas.1800851115.sapp.pdf Iberomaurusians appear closer to Natufians primarily due to shared ancestry and their non-African ancestry. You're totally humiliated once again and you can't deny the genetic distinction between Natufians and Africans is undeniable. You won't manipulate and africanize/blackwash our ancestors to fit your narrative, attempting to appropriate them and dismiss all the genetic and anthropological evidence. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3