ZAWIYA, Libya – Moammar Gadhafi's regime showed growing confidence Friday after retaking a strategic near Tripoli following days of relentless shelling against protesters-turned-rebels as it strengthened its hold on the capital and surrounding areas.
Government forces also captured a key oil town in the east and fought to dislodge rebels who took refuge among towering storage containers of crude oil and gas in nearby facilities.
Thread: Libyan rebels accused of targeting blacks
quote:Originally posted by Afrocentric Liars Exposed: This is what happens when an African Black murders for lucre people who have done nothing to him. As long as Blacks make irrational decisions that impact others, they will always be the scourge of the planet.
quote:Originally posted by Mike111: ^Fool - they have sealed their fate.
quote:Originally posted by Mike111:
quote:Originally posted by Afrocentric Liars Exposed: ^What is it the mercenary negroes are doing that does not constitute scourging, mr. intellectually bankrupt? What is it about the high crime rate amongst Black Americans against non blacks that does not fit the defintion, mr. dunce?
Afrocentric Liars Exposed: You MUST be a southern American Albino, because except for those Italian mulatto Sand Niggers in Libya, you are probably the stupidest people on Earth!
Let me explain: By showing racism to Africans IN Africa, those idiots have turned 2 billion Africans to the south against them.
By showing their racism, those idiots have turned native Libyans against them.
By showing their racism, countries who might have wanted to help them, now cannot, for fear of angering Blacks EVERYWHERE.
Even now, Libyans who may have hated Gadhafi, are now rallying to him - INCLUDING THE MILITARY!!!!
You fuching fool - have you never seen the Libyan military????
Those Sand Niggers are TOAST!
Posted by IronLion (Member # 16412) on :
TOAST!
Posted by A Simple Girl (Member # 18316) on :
Will the Libyan military actually fight to the end? They look as if they might tuck tail and run if they really had some resistance. lol
Posted by IronLion (Member # 16412) on :
You believed that two weeks ago, Simple Girl. It turned out a delusional hope. Your racist facist rebel friends got their ass kicked. Suck up and accept that.
Now the African Lions and Lionesses have begun to roar, even the EU is starting to cower..
The US has run for cover..
It is all over.
The Muurish Army prepares to rule the waves again!
Posted by A Simple Girl (Member # 18316) on :
I'm sure the Europeans are starting to cower.lol....After fighting two World Wars down to using women and children in the end, they have proven themselves genetically capable of going the distance. lol
Posted by IronLion (Member # 16412) on :
The Ashanti wars against England, 3 wars between 1803 and 1880. England lost twice and won once.
After the two world wars the Europeans got their ass licked in African liberation wars:
The Algerian war of independence, the French lost; So many people died 1959. Including so-called white soldier-mecenaries.
The Cabo Verdian/Bissuan war of liberation, the Porturgese lost and left; so many people died 1974, including so-called white soldiers-mecenaries.
The Angolan war of liberation against the Portugese, again, the Portugese lost; 1975
Zimbabwe against the South Africans and Rhodesians and Britishers; the Africans Zimbabweans won, 1979
The Mozambiquan war of Liberation against the Portugese, the Portugese lost and left 1974...
We could go on and on... You need to have your facts and records clear. The facts say that you don't mess with African fighters of today. It does'nt matter what fake hype you wish to delude yourself with...
Posted by A Simple Girl (Member # 18316) on :
^ And it makes one ponder why so much of Africa became colonized by these cowering Europeans. Maybe they should have relied less on West Indie and African fighters and more on their own kind. lol
Posted by IronLion (Member # 16412) on :
quote:Originally posted by A Simple Girl: ^ And it makes one ponder why so much of Africa became colonized by these cowering Europeans. Maybe they should have relied less on West Indie and African fighters and more on their own kind. lol
You are barely making sense now...
Perhaps you want to be more explicit, perhaps you want to address my facts with your counter facts. Your uneducated or prejudiced opinion are irrelevant here. Facts, dates, names, countries,...
And ofcourse, the Europeans were only able to "conquer" Africa with the aid of West Indian and African American soldiers and administrators.
The heat and the mosquitoes of west Africa for example, simply melted away the pink boi or wasted his skin on his bones.
It took a stronger humanity, the West Indian Africans to conquer Africans.
Posted by A Simple Girl (Member # 18316) on :
Barely making sense? Are you denying the fact that colonization by the Europeans existed in Africa?
Posted by IronLion (Member # 16412) on :
Are you denying the fact that those same Europeans were militarily defeated and chased out of Africa?
Posted by A Simple Girl (Member # 18316) on :
Get real dude,Africa could never hold up to a war against the west. The west could cut off aid to Africa and over half the population would be dead within a year. The rest would be starving and fighting each other over the leftovers.lol
Posted by IronLion (Member # 16412) on :
Dude
It appears all the following simply washed over your skull or what?:
After the two world wars the Europeans got their ass licked in African liberation wars:
The Algerian war of independence, the French lost; So many people died 1959. Including so-called white soldier-mecenaries.
The Cabo Verdian/Bissuan war of liberation, the Porturgese lost and left; so many people died 1974, including so-called white soldiers-mecenaries.
The Angolan war of liberation against the Portugese, again, the Portugese lost; 1975
Zimbabwe against the South Africans and Rhodesians and Britishers; the Africans Zimbabweans won, 1979
The Mozambiquan war of Liberation against the Portugese, the Portugese lost and left 1974...
We could go on and on... You need to have your facts and records clear. The facts say that you don't mess with African fighters of today. It does'nt matter what fake hype you wish to delude yourself with...
Posted by A Simple Girl (Member # 18316) on :
I have my facts straight. Cut off western aid and the only war is between the Africans. lol
Posted by The Explorer (Member # 14778) on :
European aid amounts to a penny in a bucket. You aren't delusional enough to think that's what has been sustaining the entire continent, opie aka simple-minded? In fact it is like this: Europeans take billions from a bucket, and drop a penny in its place. They then proceed to call that "aid". Far from sustaining life, they are trying to commit genocide.
Posted by A Simple Girl (Member # 18316) on :
And you could go on. Like tell us about the 22,000 Zulu's against the few hundred British and how the British lost. lol
Posted by A Simple Girl (Member # 18316) on :
quote:Originally posted by The Explorer: European aid amounts to a penny in a bucket. You aren't delusional enough to think that's what has been sustaining the entire continent, opie aka simple-minded? In fact it is like this: Europeans take billions from a bucket, and drop a penny in its place. They then proceed to call that "aid". Far from sustaining life, they are trying to commit genocide.
You know that would be an interesting theory to test wouldn't it? I mean the west cutting off all aid to Africa for one solid year. Interesting indeed. Take billions from a bucket the Africans don't even know exists.lol
Posted by The Explorer (Member # 14778) on :
Indeed, how does an army equipped with guns loose to spear-throwing opponent?
Posted by IronLion (Member # 16412) on :
@Simple Girl aka Hammered
Beaten into submission by hard facts of history...LMAO Reduced to mumbling foolishness. That is it for today, dunce. You are dismissed! You may go...
So I continue my discourse with the more intelligent and informed:
Europe is not in a position to threaten anyone. Europe is going down the drain. Weak economy, weak military.
Europe cannot survive without African resources, and once Europeans begin paying the real price for those resources their standard of living will fall, just as it is already in free fall...
Europe cannot dare attack any African country again without the consent of the African Union, the United Nations, and the active aid of the United States.
Europe is done militarily... It cannot fight a war on its own initiative anymore. Come to think of it, Europe is basically a colony of United States since the end of the world war 2.
It is not just so obvious because it is so-called white on white rule. But look at NATO, American controlled, the spear head of Europe.
America still fucks Europe miltarily, every day!
Posted by A Simple Girl (Member # 18316) on :
quote:Originally posted by The Explorer: Indeed, how does an army equipped with guns loose to spear-throwing opponent?
Fairly easy since the British were surprised and surrounded.lol
Posted by The Explorer (Member # 14778) on :
opie in skirts, the post you are citing is telling you that this is the reality, no a hypothesis. Evolution has evaded your neck of woods, huh?
Posted by The Explorer (Member # 14778) on :
Okay opie in skirts, so you are saying that, plain and simple: the British were as dumb as brick block and as blind as a bat.
These guys should have been executed by your majesty before sending a bunch of drooling dullards of to their graves. It would have saved them the trip. LOL
Posted by A Simple Girl (Member # 18316) on :
quote:Originally posted by The Explorer: Okay opie in skirts, so you are saying that, plain and simple: the British were as dumb as brick block and as blind as a bat.
These guys should have been executed by your majesty before sending a bunch of drooling dullards of to their graves. It would have saved them the trip. LOL
What's the matter, run out of anything intelligent to offer?lol
Posted by The Explorer (Member # 14778) on :
What are you talking about obtuse willis? LOL. You said it. The British were dumber than a lifeless rock. Going to the battle without opening their senses and calculating that the opponent could attack back.
Posted by The Explorer (Member # 14778) on :
quote:Originally posted by A Simple Girl:
Take billions from a bucket the Africans don't even know exists.lol
You see, this is why babies stay home, and adults deal with these complex issues. They sponge off of Africans with the help of their pliant stooges in government office. If those stooges don't comply, they get the barrel of the gun to their head. Ask Saddam; he would know about this. Oops, he's dead!
Posted by Clyde Winters (Member # 10129) on :
quote:Originally posted by A Simple Girl: ^ And it makes one ponder why so much of Africa became colonized by these cowering Europeans. Maybe they should have relied less on West Indie and African fighters and more on their own kind. lol
You have no knowledge of history. The Europeans began to colonize Africa in 1880's, and by the 1950's African countries were becoming independent.
It is only a figment of your imagination that Europeans are superior fighters. Europeans only rule Africans when they allow them to do so.
Posted by Clyde Winters (Member # 10129) on :
quote:Originally posted by A Simple Girl:
quote:Originally posted by The Explorer: European aid amounts to a penny in a bucket. You aren't delusional enough to think that's what has been sustaining the entire continent, opie aka simple-minded? In fact it is like this: Europeans take billions from a bucket, and drop a penny in its place. They then proceed to call that "aid". Far from sustaining life, they are trying to commit genocide.
You know that would be an interesting theory to test wouldn't it? I mean the west cutting off all aid to Africa for one solid year. Interesting indeed. Take billions from a bucket the Africans don't even know exists.lol
Lol. Europeans will never cut off aid because then they would have no influence in Africa.
They can not afford to allow Africans to believe they should , and can rule themselves. European aid is insurance that Africans will never develop an economy that benefits African people rather then multinational companies.
Posted by osirion (Member # 7644) on :
quote:Originally posted by A Simple Girl: And you could go on. Like tell us about the 22,000 Zulu's against the few hundred British and how the British lost. lol
Zulu force of some 20,000 warriors attacked a portion of the British main column consisting of about 1,800 British, colonial and native troops and perhaps 400 civilians. The Zulus were equipped mainly with the traditional Assegai iron spears and cow-hide shields, but also had a number of muskets and old rifles though they were not formally trained in their use. The British and colonial troops were armed with the state-of-the-art Martini-Henry breech-loading rifle and two 7 pounder artillery pieces as well as a rocket battery.
---------------
The British should have won easily.
Posted by Ish Gebor (Member # 18264) on :
quote:Originally posted by A Simple Girl:
quote:Originally posted by The Explorer: European aid amounts to a penny in a bucket. You aren't delusional enough to think that's what has been sustaining the entire continent, opie aka simple-minded? In fact it is like this: Europeans take billions from a bucket, and drop a penny in its place. They then proceed to call that "aid". Far from sustaining life, they are trying to commit genocide.
You know that would be an interesting theory to test wouldn't it? I mean the west cutting off all aid to Africa for one solid year. Interesting indeed. Take billions from a bucket the Africans don't even know exists.lol
Your claim is highly remarkable.
Have ever heard of the Scramble for Africa, neo-colonialism and imperialism? Even institutions such as IMF and the World Bank are part of this.
Indeed the aid is only a small amount.
Posted by Ish Gebor (Member # 18264) on :
Typo
Have you..
Posted by IronLion (Member # 16412) on :
Overall Commander Muurish Army of Libie
quote:Originally posted by awlaadberry: Libyan Defense Minister:
Posted by Whatbox (Member # 10819) on :
One comment i'd like to make is that Moorish rule in Europe seems to have been for longer than European Imperialism in Africa. Europeans millitarily ruled (ruled with a standing army there) for like a blink of an eye in comparison. started in the late 19th early 20th century ended in the mid-early 20th century.
-> On the overplayed Zulu battle (they lost the war): i know it sounds like a dumb excuse, but no one's forcing anyone to accept it: the reason commonly given for the crushing Zulu victory was a combination of Central / South East Africa being slaughtering cakewalk prior to then with most enemies greatly fearing the power of the guns leading to the British's high morale and misleading sense of security / confidence heading into a battle against people with an insane level of loyalty and deadication running into the death bath without flinching and overcoming it.
To me the British got raped the most (as far as Africa goes) in the Battles with the Beja in Eastern Egypt / Sudan and with the Asanti in what is now Benin, but especially by the latter (Asante). They were trying to get into that mug for like a century. And the Asante incorporated women in armed combat. The forest terrain likely helped too though.
Posted by The Explorer (Member # 14778) on :
The breakdown of Northeast African sovereignty, and the military and economic exhaustion from infighting between Moroccan and West Sudanese, Songhai in particular, led to the break down of security which paved way for the early incursions of Europeans into western Africa and subsequently further south. But not all regions fell to invading forces in the same way. Some regions went at it with invading forces for decades before they finally succumbed, usually due to imperialist isolation and exploitations of internal divisions within African opponents.
Ps: Let's face it, Europeans managed to eventually get upper hand in many cases, only because of advances and widespread use of firearms. A number of African armies, though not all by any means, by comparison relied on mix application of fire-arms and other traditional weaponry. Even in some cases, where firearms were used, they were not brought up to date as those in the hands of European troops.
Posted by Whatbox (Member # 10819) on :
^Yes Songhai had declined by the time the West overtook the area.
Posted by The Explorer (Member # 14778) on :
But the impact of the devastation of the conflict was felt long after its decline. That's the point. There was no such thing as "the west" either. Earliest incursions were initiated by the likes of the Portuguese and Spanish, long before northwest Europeans tried the same.
Posted by IamNomad (Member # 17656) on :
Simple you may do well not to follow European Fantasy.
quote: Nearly 80 years ago, a brave servant of the empire called Richard Corfield(He Means Coward) also tried to bring order to the Somalis, when they were in rebellion under a religious leader dubbed the Mad Mullah by the British. All Corfield got for his pains was a bullet in the head in battle and a place in the epic poetry of Somalia a bloodthirsty hymn to victory that has lived on in a society steeped in antagonism to outsiders.
80 Years ago?
quote: Between 1900 and 1904, the British launched four unsuccessful campaigns against Somalis
quote:In 1920 a combined British land and air offensive --which included the Somaliland Camel Corps, Somaliland Police, and elements from the 2d and 6th KAR and an Indian battalion--finally defeated Hasan's army. Despite this defeat
And the Italians
quote:By the Hobyo commissioner, reported movement of armed men towards the borders of the sultanate before the takeover and after. Before the Italians could concentrate on the Majeerteen, they were diverted by new setbacks. On 9 November, the Italian fear was realised when a mutiny, led by one of the military chiefs of Sultan Ali Yusuf, Omar Samatar, recaptured El-Buur. Soon the rebellion expanded to the local population. The region went into revolt as El-Dheere also came under the control of Omar Samatar.
The Italian forces tried to recapture El-Buur but they were repulsed. On 15 November the Italians retreated to Bud Bud and on the way they were ambushed and suffered heavy casualties.
While a third attempt was in the last stages of preparation, the operation commander, Lieutenant-Colonel Splendorelli, was ambushed between Bud Bud and Buula Barde. He and some of his staff were killed. As a consequence of the death of the commander of the operations and the effect of two failed operations intended to overcome the El-Buur mutiny, the spirit of Italian troops began to wane. The Governor took the situation seriously, and to prevent any more failure he requested two battalions from Eritrea to reinforce his troops, and assumed lead of the operations. Meanwhile, the rebellion was gaining sympathy across the country, and as far a field as Western Somaliland.
The fascist government was surprised by the setback in Hobyo. The whole policy of conquest was collapsing under its nose . The El-Buur episode drastically changed the strategy of Italy as it revived memories of the Adwa fiasco when Italy had been defeated by Abyssinia .
While the situation remained perplexed, De Vecchi moved the deposed sultan to Muqdisho. Fascist Italy was poised to re-conquer the sultanate by whatever means. To manoeuvre the situation within Hobyo, they even contemplated the idea of reinstating Ali Yusuf. However, the idea was dropped after they became pessimistic about the results.
To undermine the resistance, however, and before the Eritrean reinforcement could arrive, De Vecchi began to instil distrust among the local people by buying the loyalty of some of them. In fact, these tactics had better results than had the military campaign, and the resistance began gradually to wear down. Given the anarchy which would follow, the new policy was a success
Portuguese
quote:The Abyssinians were forced to ask for help from the Portuguese, who landed at the port of Massawa on February 10, 1541, during the reign of the emperor Gelawdewos. The force was led by Cristóvão da Gama and included 400 musketeers as well as a number of artisans and other non-combatants Da Gama and Imam Ahmad met on April 1, 1542 at Jarte, which Trimingham has identified with Anasa, between Amba Alag Here the Portuguese had their first glimpse of Ahmad, as recorded by Castanhoso:
While his camp was being pitched, the king of Zeila [Imam Ahmad Gurey] ascended a hill with several horse and some foot to examine us: he halted on the top with three hundred horse and three large banners, two white with red moons, and one red with a white moon, which always accompanied him, and [by] which he was recognized
due to casualties and other duties, da Gama's force was reduced to 300 musketeers. After the rains ended, Imam Ahmad attacked the Portuguese camp and through weight of numbers killed all but 140 of da Gama's troops. Da Gama himself, badly wounded, was captured with ten of his men and, after refusing an offer to spare his life if he would convert to Islam, was executed
Cristóvão (or Christopher) da Gama was the son of Vasco da Gama.
If africans Unite You will never set a foot in Africa with all you are weapons let alone rule.
![[Big Grin]](biggrin.gif)
