posted
Hi, I'm looking for more information on the tomb recently discovered,,, this year,,, The info I have is very limited and the news did not give adequite coverage. I will appreciate anyone helping me out with this.
Posts: 85 | From: bottom_of_the_barrel | Registered: May 2006
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Nourhan: Hi, I'm looking for more information on the tomb recently discovered,,, this year,,, The info I have is very limited and the news did not give adequite coverage. I will appreciate anyone helping me out with this.
posted
^^Myra is web mistress and internet queen; she can do alot of things!
Posts: 26361 | From: Atlanta, Georgia, USA | Registered: Feb 2005
| IP: Logged |
Right click on it and you can save it as a regular image.
Let's all take a moment... to watch the Great NIGERIAN flag in motion
Posts: 3423 | From: the jungle - when y'all stop playing games, call me. | Registered: Jul 2006
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Nourhan: Yes , that's it!! So where can i reseach the find in more detail?
"KV64" is a radar anomaly discovered in the Valley of the Kings pharaonic necropolis in Egypt. It is believed that the anomaly could either be a new tomb or a chamber and is located 50 feet north of KV63 which was discovered in March 2006. The designation of KV64 is not official, and the existence of such a tomb is dismissed by Zahi Hawass, head of the Supreme Council of Antiquities. It is possible, however, that Reeves' announcement of the KV64 find displeased Dr. Hawass since only the Supreme Council of Antiquities can formally make such an official pronouncement on a tomb's status. In a letter to USA Today, Dr. Hawass writes:
If what Mr. Reeves says is true, then why didn't he present this report to the Supreme Council of Antiquities" and adds "Radar can also show anomalies that are not necessarily tomb shafts. It seems to me that Mr. Reeves wants publicity more than conducting his work through a scientific approach. For this reason, I am writing you to state that the information is not true."
Reeves responds to Hawass' criticism by noting that that "he had alerted Hawass and the Supreme Council as to KV 63's location in August 2005, but received no reply. Anticipating a similar response for KV 64, "rightly or wrongly," Reeves says, he decided to release the information about the possible new tomb without any delay. "Yes, I am clearly seeking publicity — but not for my own ends," he says by e-mail. "My sole ambition in this is to see archaeological work in the Valley of the Kings carried out with the care and attention it deserves and so desperately needs." [Source]
.
Posts: 1549 | From: California, USA | Registered: Jan 2006
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Nourhan: fantastic Myra,, You're a gem. Any more?
KV64 is the Amarna Royal Tombs Project, based in Britian, and directed by Dr. Nicholas Reeves. His last article was in late July. My feeling is that we probably won't get any updated information on KV64 until early next year.
.
Posts: 1549 | From: California, USA | Registered: Jan 2006
| IP: Logged |