Numerous mummies with hair still attached to the skulls show that straight, wavy, or lightly curled hair types were common in ancient Egypt. For example, in a study (Titlbachova and Titlbach, 1977) involving detailed microscopic investigation of hair samples taken from several ancient Egyptian mummies, most were determined to have been naturally straight, wavy, or gently curled, with a roundish cross-section typical of modern Eurasian and North African peoples. Only a minority showed evidence of structural characteristics traditionally called "Negroid"; even in these the "Negroid" elements were weakly manifested.
Joann Fletcher, a consultant to the Bioanthropology Foundation in the UK, in what she calls an "absolute, thorough study of all ancient Egyptian hair samples" — relied on various techniques, such as electron microscopy and chromatography to analyze hair samples (Parks, 2000). She discovered that most of the natural hair types and those used for hairpieces were made of what she calls "Caucasian-type" hair, including even instances of blonde and red hair. Fletcher surmises that some of the lighter hair types may have been influenced by the presence of ancient Libyans and Greeks in ancient Egypt. However, this type of hair was also found to be present in much earlier times."
How true is this? And what kind of hairstyles did the Egyptians use?
Numerous mummies with hair still attached to the skulls show that straight, wavy, or lightly curled hair types were common in ancient Egypt. For example, in a study (Titlbachova and Titlbach, 1977) involving detailed microscopic investigation of hair samples taken from several ancient Egyptian mummies, most were determined to have been naturally straight, wavy, or gently curled, with a roundish cross-section typical of modern Eurasian and North African peoples. Only a minority showed evidence of structural characteristics traditionally called "Negroid"; even in these the "Negroid" elements were weakly manifested.
Joann Fletcher, a consultant to the Bioanthropology Foundation in the UK, in what she calls an "absolute, thorough study of all ancient Egyptian hair samples" — relied on various techniques, such as electron microscopy and chromatography to analyze hair samples (Parks, 2000). She discovered that most of the natural hair types and those used for hairpieces were made of what she calls "Caucasian-type" hair, including even instances of blonde and red hair. Fletcher surmises that some of the lighter hair types may have been influenced by the presence of ancient Libyans and Greeks in ancient Egypt. However, this type of hair was also found to be present in much earlier times."
How true is this? And what kind of hairstyles did the Egyptians use? [/B]
To speak of "negroid" hair is to continue holding to the obsolete notion of the true "negro" which if there is any such thing would be but one type of inner African.
Why are straight wavy and curly all lumped together as if they are one hair type when microscopically they all differ?
Inner Africans of the Sudan belt and the Horn regularly display deep wavy hair and curly hair as well as wooly hair.
While the mummies show what the mummies show, and theres no need to controvert that, I do have a critique of the red and curly haired Ms Fletchers hair classifications. Wavy and curly hair is as much "negroid" as is wooly hair which by the way some "blancoids" also have.
If we were to introduce the blanco and blancoid into anthropology to take their rightful place beside the negro and negroid, we woild have to conclude that the majority of caucasoids and even a few actual caucasians are not blancos or blancoids.
Posts: 8014 | From: the Tekrur in the Western Sahel | Registered: Feb 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
Fletcher can only see two hair types. Her heliotrichous is reserved for wooly hair and negros. Her cynotrichous lumps together all other kinds of hair and everybody she considers non negro.
This is how I think cynotrichous and heliotrichous developed. Cynotrichous is a typo for cymotrichous which could include all except one particular hair type. Heliotrichous is a mistaken attempt to coin a Greek sounding word for "helix haired." Strands of wooly and frizzly hair when long enough resemble a helix, the Greek word for spiral.
In what is a classic application of the eurocentric "Negro myth", Fletcher has taken a narrow constricted view of what she sees as "negroid hair" given it a name and allows every other hair type other than wooly to be not just caucasoid but actual "caucasian hair."
Any Afrikan or dark/black skinned peoples are declared non-Negro when not compliant to that stereotypical measuring stick known as the "true Negro." Though not as blatant as the examples in Diop's chapter 'Birth of the Negro Myth', this reasoning still exists in historical, anthropological, and other Eurocentric laden sciences. It is so automatic with Eurocentrists that I don't believe they are even conscious of perpetrating it.
Caucasian becomes a catch all category more than a defined variety. Caucasian physical features are laid so broad that anyone not fitting some stringently defined category become Caucasian by default. When such people are obviouly non-white they become caucasoid, an honorary Caucasian status I guess.
Thus East Afrikans have been labeled caucasoid. Nevermind that they are black, that can be explained away. Caucasoids are assumed to be derived from Caucasian stock. But let a Caucasian display any "negroid features" and ingenius hypotheses are proposed to decry possibilities of inner Afrikan admixture.
posted
Where did Fletchers terms cynotrichous (dog hair) and heliotrichous (sun hair) come from? What happened to ulotrichous (wooly hair), cymotrichous (wavy hair), and leiotrichous (straight hair)? Are any of the major continental human varieties (Afrikan, European, Asian) limited to having just one hair type?
Haddon 1925 characterised two opposing hair types:
ULOTRICHY _ long to short close interlocking spirals (coils ___________ curved follicle ___________ compressed lumen ___________ narrow oval cross section
LEIOTRICHY_ long lank stiff coarse and flopping straight down ___________ straight follicle ___________ round lumen ___________ pseudo circular cross section
This was based on Bory de St Vincent 1827 but with a precision and expansion. Haddon placed the range of hair types ranging between wooly and straight extremes into another category:
CYMOTRICHY frizzly _ - very short deep wave having no curve or spiral ___________ curly __ - complete circle or large spiral ___________ wavy __ - low to deep waves ___________ smooth_ - thin soft slightly curved tending to wave ___________ curved to straight follicle ___________ compressed to round lumen ___________ oval to pseudo circular cross section
The terms invented by Fletcher(?) are loaded with preconceptions and take terrible liberties with their invented Greek etymologies. Outside of racial joking, just what is dog hair? Is it determined by its smell when wet? Is it like the fur of a poodle, an Afghan hound, a spaniel, a wire hair terrier, or a chihuahua? And sun hair brings to mind images of a color, the tendency of strong sunlight to bleach hair to reddish and yellowish tints.
Dr. Fletcher's coinages detract from the standard anthropological and forensic terminology for a fanciful biased determination of hair type related to stereotypical ideas of the misnomered classifications Caucasian and Negro. As such it should be avoided. We should not begin classifying those Ethiopians with straight hair as Caucasians or those Scotch-Irish or Ashkenazim with wooly hair as Negro (I only use that word for purposes of illustration).
I recall an Ashkenazi with a Jewfro joking with me that there are two kinds of hair. There's either hair that grows up or hair that grows down. This would rob both Fletcher and Bory de St Vincent of their opinions of frizzly and curly hair being Caucasian and wavy hair not being Negro.
Posts: 8014 | From: the Tekrur in the Western Sahel | Registered: Feb 2006
| IP: Logged |
Dr. Fletcher's coinages detract from the standard anthropological and forensic terminology for a fanciful biased determination of hair type related to stereotypical ideas of the misnomered classifications Caucasian and Negro. As such it should be avoided.
I see what you're saying. Have any idea what sort of hairstyles the ancient Egyptians used?
quote:Originally posted by HERU: Originally posted by alTakruri:
Dr. Fletcher's coinages detract from the standard anthropological and forensic terminology for a fanciful biased determination of hair type related to stereotypical ideas of the misnomered classifications Caucasian and Negro. As such it should be avoided.
I see what you're saying. Have any idea what sort of hairstyles the ancient Egyptians used?
You can look in the Kmt Art threads for some examples.
No doubt there were straight and wooly hairstyles in AE. The most typical one was an Afro that was short on the top and thick at the sides and the back. Then theres braids like those throughout all Africa. Straight haired AEs let theirs flop. And there were wigs of all possible purities and combinations of the various human hair types.
If you can find repros of the paintings in the tomb of Nakht, all kinds of styles are represented. But there was one kind of hair that predominated in old Kmt that is not so common in the modern Misr of alYazid's photo contributions of these past few days.
Anthropologist Alfred Haddon used ulotrichous for wooly hair. But in Greek oulotriches can mean either curly or wooly haired in contrast to ithutriches or euthutriches. Herodotus uses these opposite types to distinguish western from eastern Aethiopians. His eastern Aethiopians are ithutriches -- straight haired, and western Aethiopians have the oulotaton trichôma -- wooliest hair.
It's clear Herodotus sees a relationship between Colchians and Egyptians because both have dark complexions and wooly hair. But that's not enough to adduce a one to one identity because they aren't the only nationalities so characterized. To tighten his argument he brings in other evidence like their both practicing circumcision (along with the Aethiopians another set of dark and wooly nationalities whom the Greeks thought that the Egyptians in turn sprung from) before others -- the circumcising "Syrians" -- caught on to it.
HERODOTUS 2.104.1&2 (on Colchian's Egyptian descent)
phainontai men gar eontes hoi Kolchoi Aiguptioi, For it is plain to see that the Colchians are Egyptians; noêsas de proteron autos ê akousas allôn legô. and what I say, I myself noted before I heard it from others. hôs de moi en phrontidi egeneto, When it occurred to me, eiromên amphoterous, I inquired of both peoples; kai mallon hoi Kolchoi ememneato tôn Aiguptiôn ê hoi Aiguptioi tôn Kolchôn: and the Colchians remembered the Egyptians better than the Egyptians remembered the Colchians;
nomizein d' ephasan hoi Aiguptioi tês Sesôstrios stratiês einai tous Kolchous. the Egyptians said that they considered the Colchians part of Sesostris' army. autos de eikasa têide, I myself guessed it, kai hoti melanchroes eisi kai oulotriches. partly because they are dark-skinned and woolly-haired; kai touto men es ouden anêkei: though that indeed counts for nothing, eisi gar kai heteroi toioutoi: since other peoples are, too; alla toiside kai mallon, but my better proof was that hoti mounoi pantôn anthrôpôn Kolchoi kai Aiguptioi kai Aithiopes peritamnontai ap' archês ta aidoia. . the Colchians and Egyptians and Ethiopians are the only nations that have from the first practised circumcision
HERODOTUS 7.70.1 (on blacks in the Persian army)
tôn men dê huper Aiguptou Aithiopôn kai Arabiôn êrche Arsamês, The Ethiopians above Egypt and the Arabians had Arsames for commander, hoi de apo hêliou anatoleôn Aithiopes* dixoi gar dê estrateuonto prosetetachato toisi Indoisi, while the Ethiopians of the east1 (for there were two kinds of them in the army) served with the Indians; diallassontes eidos* men ouden toisi heteroisi, they were not different in appearance from the others, phônên de kai trichôma* mounon: only in speech and hair: hoi men gar apo hêliou Aithiopes ithutriches* eisi, the Ethiopians from the east are straight-haired, hoi d' ek tês Libuês oulotaton trichôma echousi pantôn anthrôpôn. but the ones from Libya have the woolliest hair of all men.
[This message has been edited by alTakruri (edited 22 December 2004).]
Posts: 8014 | From: the Tekrur in the Western Sahel | Registered: Feb 2006
| IP: Logged |
So why did Herodotus refer to Egyptians and Ethiopians(meaning Nubians, etc.) as having black skins and woolly hair?
And why do we find in Aristotle's Physiognomica the observation that Egyptians and Ethiopians have the woolliest hair known at the time?
And why do the large multiplicity of tomb panels show the AE's as having black hair or black wigs?
Very often the hair on the AE's as demonstrated on their tomb panels is often very short(shaved) of the Africoid variety. How realistic is this?
If the AE hair was non-Africoid why then did they wear wigs and why do they seem to be relatively hairless(note very short beards, little facial hair, etc.)?
I have seen pictures of t he kinds of combs the AE's used for their hair and they seem especially made for the Africoid type of hair--so are these combs authentic, and actually used them?
Why did the AE's seem to have the same hair type on the head and face as the Nubians to the South, but different from the Asiatics and Eurasians as shown on their panels showing the different known ethnic types(cf. Lepsius's depiction)?
If Fletcher's analysis is valid then why do the sculpture morphologies with reagrd to hair type of the AE's seem so very different from that of the Greeks and Romans?
So with how much reliability should one regard Fletcher's analysis?
posted
You know, I find myself repeating myself lately...
Diop seemed both puzzled and suspicious when he wrote;
quote:
It is customary to mention the straight hair of certain carefully chosen mummies, the only ones found in museums, to affirm that they represent a prototype of the White race, notwithstanding their prognathism. These mummies are displayed conspicuously in an attempt to prove the whiteness of the Egyptians. The very coarseness of their hair precludes acceptance of that contention. When such hair exists on the head of a mummy, it merely indicates the Dravidian type, in reality, whereas the prognathism and black skin-pigmented, not blackened by tar or any other product-excludes any idea of a white race. The meticulous selection process to which they have been subjected rules out any possibility of their being a prototype. -- The African Origin of Civilization
Diop was, of course, correct on two points:
1) Among the Cushitic peoples of northeast Africa, of which the Kemetians formed a part, long hair and straight hair was common. It certainly wasn't unusual.
2) Given their tract record, it is plain common sense, to be skeptical of Western Egyptologists and their 'discoveries' and presentations.
But it is my opinion, that due to the process of mummification, it is doubtful that any really 'woolly-haired' mummies would ever be found. And I think that had Diop lived in Harlem, for example, prior to the 1960s, he probably would have understood why this would be. Ancient Egyptian mummies were, inadvertently, submitted to a form of 'conking' and/or Jheri curl!
Deliberate hair-straightening; the conk and the jheri curl
The Conk, which originated in the 1920s, was an attempt by Black men to straighten their hair to make it look like that of White men. The primary ingredients used to straighten or relax the hair are: Sodium hydroxide (the conk) and Ammonium thioglycolate(the jheri curl). These chemical agents work against moisture, or in other words they dry the hair structure to the degree that it relaxes and the woolly hair looses its natural tendency to curl. This chemically straightened hair also cannot be reverted back to its original natural state. The only way to get rid of a conk is to allow it to grow out.
The primary process of embalming the corpse was the 'natron bath' wherein the corpse was completely covered in dry natron for a period of forty days. The chemical ingredients in natron are: Sodium carbonate; bicarbonate; sodium sulphate; and chloride. These chemical agents work against moisture, in fact, it was used to 'dry out' the body. (Kinda like making beef jerky.)
This, I think, is why you find all these long haired-straight haired prognathous Negro (IE, Dravidian types.) mummies.
Its more 'conk' than conspiracy.
[This message has been edited by Wally (edited 13 September 2004).]
and ausar concurred:
quote: posted 13 September 2004 04:00 PM
...You are correct...that the substance in the embalming material has been known to straighten hair,and over time mummy hair loses elasticity that hold hair into place. Still there are Nubians and modern Upper Egyptians with a wavy type hair that is not straight but is actually very thick. Europeans have wavy hair that is very thin and has a more rounded folice as opposed to people of African desent.
[This message has been edited by Wally (edited 22 December 2004).]
posted
Actually Fletcher has stated that she doesn't like to use term's like caucasian or negro. She doesn't use those terms at all in her book on Nefertiti.
cynotrichous, from, cyno -> dog and trich -> hair cynotrichous -> dog's hair, meaning hair that is wavy to straight in texture like a dog's and contrasted with hair that is wooly in texture (lamb's hair).
The best method for associating hair texture with ethnicity is based on the thickness of the cross section of the hair shaft, and not it's degree of curl or it's color, which for reasons already attested can be misleading. AE hair was generally thick and africoid and not of the thin eurasian variety.
Ethnic Group Hair thickness index Badarian, pre-dynastic Egyptian 50.0 San, Southern African 55.O0 Zulu, Southern African 55.O0 Sub-Saharan Africa (ave?) 60.O0 Ancient Egypt (ave?) 60.02 Tasmanian (Black) 64.70 Australian (Black) 68.00 Western European 71.20 Asian Indian 73.00 Navajo American 77.00 Chinese 82.60
worth noting:
* notice that some Blacks Asian groups have thin hair much like Europeans, and some Black South Indians have even thinner hair than Europeans.
* for people who like to play games with cluster groups -> notice that European hair and hair texture clusters IN-BETWEEN East Asian and African.
* in terms of texture and thickness the extremes of hair are actually found in khoisanoid and diminuative type (thick and peppercorn) hair; and straight and thin east asian hair at the other extreme.
* even African wooly (afro) hair is in between peppercorn and curly.
* europeans have highly heterogenious hair types...curly bordering on afro, wavy and straight. black, brown, red, blonde (yellow) and blonde (white); attempts to assign these diverse types to the 'caucasian' hair group is just another attempt to disguise the reality of diversity within Europeans.
* the only hair type that is endemic to europe is predominent blondism.
* by virtue of paleness of skin color, eye color and hair color, and recessive genes associated with this, you could arguably define 'nordic types' as a separate race from the rest of Europeans and the rest of the world. it is important to understand why, [wst] anthropologists never attempt to do this, instead sometimes clinging to their 'caucasoid' umbrella which is designed precisely to sweep these facts under the rug.
2) Given their tract record, it is plain common sense, to be skeptical of Western Egyptologists and their 'discoveries' and presentations.
Excellent point. Sad but true, especially given the contribution that many Western Egyptologists have otherwise made to the knowledge, and the access they have to future discoveries.
---
Speaking of hair & race: What conclusions can we come to with regard to body hair?
Are africans less hairy than "caucasians"? Facial hair was mentioned earlier -- do Africans on average have less facial hair (and body hair) than caucasians? (Admixture notwithstanding...)
...And once body hair became all but vestigial among most people, why did it make such a strong comeback in other groups? I'm thinking clothing would've protected from the cold -- so why such furry backs?
I've even heard (from a TV documentary) that ice-age humans in europe would have shaved their beards to avoid it icing up. Why such thick facial hair in the first place, if not as an advantage in an icy climate?
I'm not suggesting any point or other, I just thought these are interesting questions, as long as we're discussing evolutionary biology. I also know some "Africoid" people are hairy, but as a general rule, are caucasians hairier?
(Perhaps it's some protection from the sun?)
Posts: 237 | From: New York, NY, USA | Registered: Mar 2004
| IP: Logged |
supercar
unregistered
posted
quote:Originally posted by sunstorm2004: I'm not suggesting any point or other, I just thought these are interesting questions, as long as we're discussing evolutionary biology. I also know some "Africoid" people are hairy, but as a general rule, are caucasians hairier?
I don't see any reason to doubt that Eurasians, especially Europeans, generally have more visible body hair, than the tropically adapted folks of Africa.
quote:Originally posted by supercar: I don't see any reason to doubt that Eurasians, especially Europeans, generally have more visible body hair, than the tropically adapted folks of Africa.
That's another puzzle. To date, I have not seen any artform depicting the ancient Egyptians as "hairy." Mediterranean people are notoriously hairy. I wonder what the proponents of ancient-Egyptians-were-mediterranean-caucasoids would interpose here for an argument.
So let them get out Kemetic art showing hairy bodies. Now, I'm not talking about Syrians and Libyans. Be forewarned.
quote:Originally posted by sunstorm2004: I don't think they depicted anyone as hairy, even "white" people & asiatics.
Some asiatics were distinguished by tattoos though...
One of the brickmakers in a painting in the tomb of Rekhmire, though not as hirsute as that guy in the post <shudder>, does have a belly and chest full of sandy hair like his stubbly beard. His lips seem to mark him as one of the Aamw.
The blue eye in this jpeg is a touchup and does not appear in the hardcopy prints of this painting.
Posts: 8014 | From: the Tekrur in the Western Sahel | Registered: Feb 2006
| IP: Logged |
Possibly an older worker with gray hair. Note though that the beard has possibly reached full length and the chest hair is typical of some Africoids. The head is close cropped with gray Africoid hair--it seems. The physiognomy would seem to suggest someone of Nilotic origins.
quote:Originally posted by kembu: That's another puzzle. To date, I have not seen any artform depicting the ancient Egyptians as "hairy." Mediterranean people are notoriously hairy.
Thought Writes:
We certainly see this HAIRY type in the reenactments we see on Discovery Channel, etc. Modern and Ancient Egyptians have different phenotypes!
quote:Originally posted by alTakruri: And Hawass and the antiquity department and museums of Misr apparently have no problem with that distortion of fact.
Thought Writes:
Hawas has the same NON-INDIGENOUS, HAIRY phenotype.
quote:That's another puzzle. To date, I have not seen any artform depicting the ancient Egyptians as "hairy." Mediterranean people are notoriously hairy. I wonder what the proponents of ancient-Egyptians-were-mediterranean-caucasoids would interpose here for an argument.
It seems Egyptians generally didn't depict people as hairy (though set was said to be red and hairy.)
Anyway, you have to wonder if asiatics and mediterranean peoples neighboring egypt depicted themselves as hairy... Maybe you guys know of some pictures?
Posts: 237 | From: New York, NY, USA | Registered: Mar 2004
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by sunstorm2004: Anyway, you have to wonder if asiatics and mediterranean peoples neighboring egypt depicted themselves as hairy... Maybe you guys know of some pictures?
quote:Originally posted by sunstorm2004: It seems Egyptians generally didn't depict people as hairy (though set was said to be red and hairy.)
Anyway, you have to wonder if asiatics and mediterranean peoples neighboring egypt depicted themselves as hairy... Maybe you guys know of some pictures?
The higher class seemed to be better groomed, but the poor could get wooly, at least in wall reliefs. There's one image of a guy working in a mine who looks like he hasn't shaved in a while and his hair appears to be locking up. I'll try to post the image by the weekend.
quote:Originally posted by alTakruri: One of the brickmakers in a painting in the tomb of Rekhmire, though not as hirsute as that guy in the post <shudder>, does have a belly and chest full of sandy hair like his stubbly beard. His lips seem to mark him as one of the Aamw.
The blue eye in this jpeg is a touchup and does not appear in the hardcopy prints of this painting.
Thanks for the pic, but this "hairy" guy looks African. That's the kind of "hairy" you see among the relatively smaller percentage of hairy Africans, especially older men. So he certainly cannot be characterized as a mediterranean caucasoid.
quote:Originally posted by kembu: Thanks for the pic, but this "hairy" guy looks African. That's the kind of "hairy" you see among the relatively smaller percentage of hairy Africans, especially older men. So he certainly cannot be characterized as a mediterranean caucasoid.
Looks African to me. Only the touchup with the blue eyes obscures this, and even then......
quote:Originally posted by kembu: Thanks for the pic, but this "hairy" guy looks African. That's the kind of "hairy" you see among the relatively smaller percentage of hairy Africans, especially older men. So he certainly cannot be characterized as a mediterranean caucasoid.
Med doesn't automatically corespond to Caucasian. Look at these Keftiu from the first EgyArt thread who are at once N Med or I Med and Africoid.
And so, well, I don't know about Med caucasoid but the guy with chest and belly hair his facial profile does resemble some of those I've seen of E Meds in AE paintings. Not to be absolutist, this guy's profile is in a contrast to his co-workers who wear the patented "TaSeti leather briefs." <smile>
Tens of thousands of Meds found their way into service in AE. Should it be impossible to find them portrayed at work alongside other Kmtyw both native and nationalized or was it forbidden for artists to put nationalized Aamw in a painting? So how do we identify nationalized foreigners in AE art if we can't admit certain sets of features are more likely nonAE although some AE and NE Africans may have similar traits?
To see the occasional foreign national in AE art doesn't detract one bit from the fact that AE is an African originated civ founded by, maintained, ruled, and overwhelmingly populated by inner Africans as multi-disciplined analyses plainly shows without the slightest doubt.
.
[This message has been edited by alTakruri (edited 29 December 2004).]
Posts: 8014 | From: the Tekrur in the Western Sahel | Registered: Feb 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
One major difference between the Keftu and indigenous Kemetians was the slender waist and longer hair. Notice the Keftu has a more slender waist and much longer hair than the indigenous Kemetians.
Posts: 8675 | From: Tukuler al~Takruri as Ardo since OCT2014 | Registered: Feb 2003
| IP: Logged |
posted
The Kememu were simply doing what every other group does; portraying other peoples, probably unconsciously, and often it's subtle, to resemble themselves. That's one reason why Buddha looks more Japanese or Chinese than Indian (the other being that people also portray their gods and heroes in their own image). Even when the Kemetian artist painted Asiatics or any Deshretu, they tend to have African physical features. "His lips seem to mark him as one of the Aamw." Oh, really. No, it's how Blacks draw people.
posted
And of course European artists have this persistent tendency to portray AE's as pale-skinned Europoids even when they have the authentic AE wall portrayals directly in front of them.
Posts: 5492 | Registered: Nov 2004
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Kem-Au: The higher class seemed to be better groomed, but the poor could get wooly, at least in wall reliefs. There's one image of a guy working in a mine who looks like he hasn't shaved in a while and his hair appears to be locking up. I'll try to post the image by the weekend.
This 19th Dynasty wig might be trying to portray what Egyptian women thought was the 'ideal hairstyle'? The owner probably wouldn't have gone to the fuss of being buried with it unless it was of the utmost quality and suitable for the afterlife.
[This message has been edited by Psusennes I (edited 01 January 2005).]
Posts: 24 | From: England | Registered: Dec 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
Why does it have to be the ideal hairstyle? Nefertiti often wore short braided curly 'nubian' style wigs. These were sometimes made from actual Kemetian hair.
Posts: 15202 | Registered: Jun 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
Do we all have the same tastes? Perhaps the owner had different tastes, or perhaps it was the fashion at the time?
Posts: 24 | From: England | Registered: Dec 2004
| IP: Logged |
This 19th Dynasty wig might be trying to portray what Egyptian women thought was the 'ideal hairstyle'? The owner probably wouldn't have gone to the fuss of being buried with it unless it was of the utmost quality and suitable for the afterlife.
[This message has been edited by Psusennes I (edited 01 January 2005).]
Why on earth would one quote or show something from Stormfront's webpage madness??
Posts: 142 | From: University Height, NJ, USA | Registered: Nov 2004
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by anacalypsis: Sir Altakruri
is this nubian person labeled as such in the original painting, or was he denoted as something else?? I mean, was this a southern egyptain, or a kushite, or Meroe, or southern african??
It's a glazed faience tile of foreign prisoners from Ramses III temple at Medinet Habu. At that time period most likely guess is that he is a man of Kesh, not as far south as Meroe but probably Kerma, definitely not from southern Africa.
Rather than an actual foe, it may just be a holdover from when Kesh was one of the Nine Bows. Then again it may recall the plot on the part of a harem wife, who was the sister of the Commander of the Archers of Nubia, to depose Ramses III.
Also, I noticed that the people of crete look like peoples of color (black african, arab, southeast asia, etc), and NOT EUROPEAN (WHITE) as mentioned by abaza.(sorry to go there, but its astonishing that he could have even thought that in the first place). My question is how do you know that they are from Crete and not from Punt?
The hairstyle, trade goods, kilts, and footwear identify the people in the painting as Keftiu. Not all of Crete was dark, there are notably pale white Cretans. Since this scene from the tomb of Senmut is one of tribute bearers maybe the officials back home thought it wise to send delegates whose looks would sympathize favorable acceptance.
SIDENOTE Aeschylus in The Suppliant Maidens has those women declare their Argive heritage. The incredulous king recounts that their darkness and features belie Greek origins. Nevertheless he is willing to hear the maidens out and agree with their refutation of his surmise. The Greek author thus recognizes an ancient African strain as a small part of some Greek lineages. Posts: 8014 | From: the Tekrur in the Western Sahel | Registered: Feb 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
Everywhere I've read that the reason the AE shaved their heads was to combat hair lice.
Anyone know what evidence supports this reasoning? Are there alternate views?
It just seems a peculiar solution for such a common problem. And if hair lice is the reason behind the custom, why wasn't the custom as widespread in neighboring cultures?
Could egyptologists be simply *presuming* head lice was the reason behind this custom?
Posts: 237 | From: New York, NY, USA | Registered: Mar 2004
| IP: Logged |
Keino
unregistered
posted
quote:Originally posted by alTakruri: One of the brickmakers in a painting in the tomb of Rekhmire, though not as hirsute as that guy in the post <shudder>, does have a belly and chest full of sandy hair like his stubbly beard. His lips seem to mark him as one of the Aamw.
The blue eye in this jpeg is a touchup and does not appear in the hardcopy prints of this painting.
I'm wondering is the blue appearance of the eyes of the old man is arcus senilis which is a whitish to appeaing ring around the cornea. In people with dark coloured eyes this ring may have a light or sky blue appearnce. It is due to the deposition of fat granules in the cornea, or to hyaline degeneration. It is mostly seen in old patients and rarely in middle aged and the young. It in the west its is also seen in greater numbers in African americans. This is not generally considered to be of pathological importance, but from a bio-chemical viewpoint, it represents a specific metabolic disturbance and provides a valuable indication as to fat and cholesterol metabolism. One school of thought is that it has some cardiovascular health indications as well. There is also indications that alcohol consumption increases the likihood of it occuring.
Here is a link to a picture of some one with extensive arcus senilis whom originally had brown eyes. The residual brown colour of the iris can still be seen around the the inner circumference of the pupil and iris. http://www.augen-forum.de/greisenbogen.php
Tukuler
multidisciplinary Black Scholar
Member # 19944
posted
Excerpts from a moldie oldie post above
quote:Originally posted by alTakruri:
quote:Originally posted by HERU:
quote: Originally posted by alTakruri:
Dr. Fletcher's coinages detract from the standard anthropological and forensic terminology for a fanciful biased determination of hair type related to stereotypical ideas of the misnomered classifications Caucasian and Negro. As such it should be avoided.
I see what you're saying. Have any idea what sort of hairstyles the ancient Egyptians used?
You can look in the Kmt Art threads for some examples.
Anthropologist Alfred Haddon used ulotrichous for wooly hair. But in Greek oulotriches can mean either [our] curly or wooly haired in contrast to ithutriches or euthutriches. Herodotus uses these opposite types to distinguish western from eastern Aethiopians. His eastern Aethiopians are ithutriches -- straight haired, and western Aethiopians have the oulotaton trichôma -- wooliest hair.
HERODOTUS 7.70.1 (on blacks in the Persian army)
tôn men dê huper Aiguptou Aithiopôn kai Arabiôn êrche Arsamês, The Ethiopians above Egypt and the Arabians had Arsames for commander,
hoi de apo hêliou anatoleôn Aithiopes* dixoi gar dê estrateuonto prosetetachato toisi Indoisi, while the Ethiopians of the east1 (for there were two kinds of them in the army) served with the Indians;
diallassontes eidos* men ouden toisi heteroisi, they were not different in appearance from the others,
phônên de kai trichôma* mounon: only in speech and hair:
hoi men gar apo hêliou Aithiopes ithutriches* eisi, the Ethiopians from the east are straight-haired,
hoi d' ek tês Libuês oulotaton trichôma echousi pantôn anthrôpôn. but the ones from Libya have the woolliest hair of all men.
[This message has been edited by alTakruri (edited 22 December 2004).]
posted
Straightening hair dates back as far as ancient Egypt, where flat iron plates were used to straighten unruly hair. A method which more than not resulted in burns – ouch!
The desirable straight hairstyle was popular throughout many periods in history.
quote:"Egyptian ideals of beauty are still of straightened glossy hair, in a way that’s consistent with our history – Nefertiti achieved straight hair with a constant wig," says Claire (my sister). "But natural Egyptian hair varies hugely," she points out, "the mix of ancestry means our hair can be coarse, tight curls, loose curls, or even fairly naturally straight. Afro hair has its own culture and its own styles, but Egyptian hair doesn’t have its own identity in the same way, so I think going 'natural' in Egyptian culture has less to do with emulating Caucasian ideals and more to do with personal preference."
quote: Eman El-Deeb, a young Egyptian woman, decided to leave her country in 2016. But it wasn't for education, work or a partner. It was because of her hair.
The 26-year-old has big curly hair that is admired in Spain, where she currently lives.
But in Egypt, where many women seek to emulate European ideals of beauty, she felt like her hair was a curse.
"The decision to leave was a very sad one for me. I never imagined I'd migrate," says Eman.
Noran Amr, 32, has been heat-free for a year. Last month she attended a wedding with her hair naturally curly for the first time.
Situated in one of Egypt's most affluent neighbourhoods, The Curly Studio - unlike most Egyptian salons - works on appointment basis only. It receives more than 30 clients a week, mostly young women.
quote:"The trend is very popular, especially among millennials," says the studio's owner, 33-year-old Sara Safwat.
Even Eman felt the change.
"In April 2017, while I was visiting Egypt, a taxi driver told me 'your hair is very nice.' At first I thought he was being sarcastic. But then I realised he was being sincere.
"That was the first positive comment about my hair that I had ever heard in Egypt."
^^^^ This is the magic of ADOS & AFroPUNK at work...
quote:HE SCIENCE OF ANCIENT EGYPTIAN HAIR AND WHY IT SOMETIMES LOOKS, RED, LIGHT-COLOURED AND STRAIGHT
There are many myths about ancient Egyptian hair and most of them have been perpetuated by Hollywood and Zahi Hawass. Many Egyptians did not shave their heads and there are new studies which blow out of the window many myths about these ancients - they clearly suffered from the same problems and desires as those with nappy hair today.
THE EMBALMING PROCESS WAS ADAPTED TO PRESERVE THE HAIRSTYLE
Researchers have found that the Egyptians gelled and dyed their hair, braided it and wore elaborate hair styles including wigs, hair extensions and hair pieces. The embalming process was adapted to preserve the hairstyle.
Natalie McCreesh, an archaeological scientist from the KNH Centre for Biomedical Egyptology at the University of Manchester, UK and her colleagues studied hair samples taken from 18 mummies. The oldest is around 3,500 years old but most were excavated from a cemetery in the Dakhleh Oasis in the Western Desert and date from the Greco-Roman times, around 2,300 years ago.
The researchers believe that this fat-based hair gel was used by the Egyptians to mould and hold the hair in position to enhance appearance, since some of the deceased that had been mummified naturally in the desert also had fats in their hair. When the mummified using embalming chemicals, the undertakers seem to have taken special care to retain the deceased's hairdos, as they used different chemicals on different parts of the body. 'It is evident that different materials were used for different areas of the body,' the researchers write. 'The hair samples from the Dakhleh Oasis were not coated with resin/bitumen-based embalming materials but were coasted with a fat-based substance.'
The mummies had all different kinds of hairstyles depending on the age, sex and presumed social status. Researchers have previously discovered objects in Egyptian tombs that seem to be curling tongs, so they most likely would have been used in conjunction with the hair produces to achieve different styles. There's also speculation that the Egyptians used beeswax on their hair.
Queen Ahmose-Nofretari
Elderly lady from tomb KV35, hair colouring and texture most likely [henna on grey] - styling and age of mummy
Hair straightening is really EFFECTIVE and long lasting in dry desert climates...
Also hair straightening is absolutely pointless in tropical environments..
-------------------- It's not my burden to disabuse the ignorant of their wrong opinions Posts: 2699 | From: New York | Registered: Jun 2015
| IP: Logged |
posted
Ancient Egyptian hair was generally Afro style hair and African style locks. Many times the crowns of ancient Egypt as shown in the artwork consist of stylized Afros with curls embossed into enameled or golden surfaces. And this goes back to the old kingdom.
Not to mention the adult hairstyles were common in Africa, but also the side lock of youth is likewise common to Africa as well.
Unfortunately the curveball is that they call these hairstyles "Nubian" as if foreigners were playing dress up as Africans. But it just is a common pattern of culture found in populations of Africans with African hair.
That said, many populations outside of Africa also have some curly hair, including Europeans, even if they often wear it straight.
Posts: 8889 | Registered: May 2005
| IP: Logged |
Tukuler
multidisciplinary Black Scholar
Member # 19944
posted
quote:ithutriches or euthutriches.
What am I seeing here in euthutriches?
In Greek the word Straight references a straight line which is a good line vs a crooked one. EU is a prefix from Greek used in English
Is eu in euthutriches there to mean good hair?
Don't know much about the language, just something I wonder. Not implying the HBA term 'good hair' derives from ancient Greek. Nor that Greeks thought wooly hair was bad, the reinvigorated Odysseus deads that notion.