quote:
Originally posted by Thought2:
Thought Writes:Charlie, I agree that you have added much value to this discourse. However, the issue has ALLWAYS been that genetic lineages such as E3b1 DELTA spread from Black Africa to Europe where it ***LATER*** derived into E3b1 alpha which is indeed European specific. The DELTA cluster enables us to trace the spread of an BLACK AFRICAN DERIVED and BLACK AFRICAN SPECIFIC linage along with technological transmitions to Europeans. Furthermore it has been established that BOTH terms Sub-Saharan and Black African have social meaning. We chose Black African because it does not sugar-coat the truth and because it relates to the people among whom the lineage derived NOT some arbitrary land mass.
PEACE
Just need to be sophisticated enough in our thinking to understand the strateges applied by ws.t.
First decapitate Africa via severing North Africa from something called "sub-saharan" Africa.
Then, if the "patient" has the audacity to continue twitching, rip its heart out [East Africa].
Can't overemphasise the importance of understanding why this was done, and exactly what is gained by whom and at Africa's expense, in doing so.
There are many valid approaches to reclaiming African biohistory -
Tropical Africa,
Black Africa,
Native Africa,
....are all valid concepts and all are necessary to faciliate a true understanding of Africa's people/history.
Quote from ws.t [and non ws.t] sources, yes.
Learn from them, yes.
Allow them to tell us how to define ourselves as Africans, and 'when' we are permitted to do so.....Heaven's no!
Good discussion though guys, and I look forward to learning more from all of you.
[This message has been edited by rasol (edited 21 October 2005).]