...
EgyptSearch Forums Post New Topic  New Poll  Post A Reply
my profile | directory login | register | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» EgyptSearch Forums » Egyptology » A CHALLENGE for those who believe the Ancient Egyptians were White... (Page 2)

 - UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!   This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2   
Author Topic: A CHALLENGE for those who believe the Ancient Egyptians were White...
ausar
Member
Member # 1797

Rate Member
Icon 4 posted      Profile for ausar   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 

quote:
We can argue over busts and pictures, from Ancient Egypt, which have been damaged and therefor impossible to tell whether they are Black or White,(certainly people whore whigs; soldiers rarely do, and not all of have been so damaged that we must question whether or not they have an afro) but microscopic analysis has been done on the remains of certain Egyptian mummies, a little while ago, I posted one of these studies and I will do so again so people can see them.

A second point to be made, would be to look, at some Modern Egyptians who have largely segregated themselves from the rest of Egypt. I am refering to Coptic Christians. Many of whom, look very, very Caucasian, and claim a less mixed ancestry than the rest of Egypt


Most Coptic Christians look no different than most modern Egyptians. This is a long held myth started by British archaeologist that said modern Coptic Christians are pure direct desendants of the ancient Egyptians. However, Coptic Christians have mixed with Greeks,Armenians,and Syrians. You are also forgetting that most of the Christians in early times were mostly Jews and Greeks.


The modern Egyptians that have been the most isolated and segregated are the Fellahin and Sa'idi people. Notice also in areas like Luxor the Coptic Christians look no different from their Muslim counterparts. Copts in this area are dark-brown in apperance.

The Coptic agricultural population (fellahIn) in the villages of Upper Egypt and elsewhere are not markedly different from the Mahommedan fellahIn, who, of course, are of the same stock, but mixed with Arab blood. The Copts in the towns, who have always been engaged in sedentary occupations, as scribes and handicraftsmen, have a more delicate frame and complexion, and may have mingled with Syrian and Armenian Christians.


http://55.1911encyclopedia.org/C/CO/COPTS.htm


[This message has been edited by ausar (edited 20 October 2005).]


Posts: 8675 | From: Tukuler al~Takruri as Ardo since OCT2014 | Registered: Feb 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Djehuti
Member
Member # 6698

Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Djehuti     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by ausar:

Most Coptic Christians look no different than most modern Egyptians. This is a long held myth started by British archaeologist that said modern Coptic Christians are pure direct desendants of the ancient Egyptians. However, Coptic Christians have mixed with Greeks,Armenians,and Syrians. You are also forgetting that most of the Christians in early times were mostly Jews and Greeks.


The modern Egyptians that have been the most isolated and segregated are the Fellahin and Sa'idi people. Notice also in areas like Luxor the Coptic Christians look no different from their Muslim counterparts. Copts in this area are dark-brown in apperance.

The Coptic agricultural population (fellahIn) in the villages of Upper Egypt and elsewhere are not markedly different from the Mahommedan fellahIn, who, of course, are of the same stock, but mixed with Arab blood. The Copts in the towns, who have always been engaged in sedentary occupations, as scribes and handicraftsmen, have a more delicate frame and complexion, and may have mingled with Syrian and Armenian Christians.


http://55.1911encyclopedia.org/C/CO/COPTS.htm


...


Posts: 26286 | From: Atlanta, Georgia, USA | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Djehuti
Member
Member # 6698

Rate Member
Icon 12 posted      Profile for Djehuti     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Horemheb:
We have their mummies tdog, we know they were not black africans. As Dr Hawass recently noted, "Ancient Egyptians were North African caucasians." This issue has been settled for decades.

On the contrary. Decades ago, anthropologists grouped Egyptians as being part of the 'Hamitic' race which also included Northern Sudanese (even Nubians) as well as Ethiopians and Somalians. Unfortunately these bias experts could not get around the fact that these peoples were black which is why they considered 'Hamitic' people to be essentially "extremely dark-skinned caucasoids".

However, many anthropologists of today of corrected these bias mistakes of the past and most people today in the anthropological community accept the FACT that Northeast Africans (including Egyptians) were NOT caucasoid as stated by anthropologists like: Anton et al, Zakrzewski et al, Hiernaux et al, Rightmire et al, Groves et al, Jablonsky et al, Brace et al, Angel et al, Keita et al. etc. etc. etc.

Sorry Hore, but Hawass is not an anthropologist!!

quote:
Anthropologists do not say Egyptians were black Africans, they never have said that. Mansa , if you are an American black you have zero connection to ancient Egypt. You are being made a fool by the afrocentrics.

Again, yes they have. As far as American blacks having zero connection to ancient Egypt, As a Filipino I have zero connection to Korean civilization yet no one is denying that Koreans and Filipinos have some relation as Asians. And there are some white Americans who want to be connected with ancient Greece even though they are of northwestern Europeans descent and Greeks are southeast Europeans.

[This message has been edited by Djehuti (edited 20 October 2005).]


Posts: 26286 | From: Atlanta, Georgia, USA | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Imhemazi
Junior Member
Member # 9332

Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Imhemazi     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
This is plain as daylight, hore you should be ashamed and then again you shouldn't because your a total idiot you have no proof more less no RIGHT to even think of the AE civilization in connection with caucasian other than the exception when the invasions had begun by the caucasian. This is saddening.

[This message has been edited by Imhemazi (edited 20 October 2005).]


Posts: 5 | From: memphis, tn | Registered: Oct 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Ceelgabo_11
Member
Member # 8942

Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Ceelgabo_11     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 



Horemb how come you didn't figure out that these two didn't belong to North African Caucosiod, is it maybe because there is no such thing as caucosiod or Negriod or is it maybe that North Africans like these two guys are nothing more than 1000's years of mixing between Africans and Europeans.


Posts: 554 | From: Somaliland | Registered: Sep 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
brazil
Member
Member # 8204

Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for brazil     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
where are the white pharoahs?...dont post modern day egyptians pics which means nothing
Posts: 31 | From: norfolk va | Registered: Jul 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
  This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2   

Quick Reply
Message:

HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.

Instant Graemlins
   


Post New Topic  New Poll  Post A Reply Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


Contact Us | EgyptSearch!

(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com

Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3