...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Arguments Against Qustul....
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by J-Dog: [QB] I have a question regarding the Qustul incense burner, you've all heard of that right? This is specifically addressed to you supercar, since you're the most ojective and scientifically sounded guy on this board. Now, super, don't you think the argument that the Qustul burner is a egyptian import is very weak, especially in the light that the Qustul thingy is of local nubian origin? And what's this crap about an Abydos Naqada IIIA tomb being older than Qustul, IIIA goes back to only 3300 BC, while Qustul goes back to 3350-3400 B.C. Can someone please explain this nonsense? Thanks and peace. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3