...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Nefertiti: Another Great White Hoax
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by the lioness: [QB] . [IMG]http://www.thejakartapost.com/files/images/egip.img_assist_custom.jpg[/IMG] http://www.thejakartapost.com/files/images/egip.img_assist_custom.jpg Wally is just ignoring the CT Scan of Nefertiti that was done in 2009 and published in the monthly journal, Radiology. Henri Stierlin who had flimsy evidence in speculating that the bust was a fake was debunked by the findings of this scan, that there was an earlier stage portrait of the Queen underneath showing more wrinkles (see lower left picture that is in the above set of six) ) This earlier stage is shown above. If it were fake there would not be this earlier more realistically old looking sculpture underneath that got smoothed over. The pigments used were also tested and determined to be genuine ancient Egyptian. Ancient Egyptian pigments cannot be removed from an antique object then transposed on a forgery to make it look antique.Before this CT scan Stierlin was just trying to make name for himself by questioning the bust's authenticity. Besides it is very similar to other busts of Nefertiti such as: [IMG]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/1e/PortraitStudyOfNefertiti-ThutmoseWorkshop_EgyptianMuseumBerlin.png[/IMG] [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3