...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
they look different
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Antalas: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Djehuti: First off you can't make conjectures about what traits a skull has or doesn't have just on a view of a profile picture.[/QUOTE]You actually can even though it's not perfectly reliable but you can quickly check things like nasal spine, alveolar prognathism, zygomatics, occipital bun, frontal profile, nasal bridge, etc etc [QUOTE]Originally posted by Djehuti: Second, that you use outdated racial notions like "caucasoid" and the Sub-Saharan fallacy is another reason why you are not taken seriously.[/QUOTE]These are not outdated "racial notions" but are still used in forensic anthropology. Moreover you don't see any problem when you labelled many of those skulls "negroid" or as having "negroid traits" [QUOTE]Originally posted by Djehuti: About one-third of Sub-Saharans would also fall into the "caucasoid" category based [/QUOTE]one-third ? source ? And I already acknowledge the presence of caucasoid types in SSA especially in the Horn but that's because they have substantial amount of west eurasian ancestry. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3