...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
The libyan mummy
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Mazigh: [QB] III- some geografical- and historical data, supported by languistic data: the topography of the regions of the big desert [the sahara of north africa] as well as the stones's sedimentations wich date from the lithic and neolithic times prove that the konw sahara wasn't a sahara/desert in the antiquity. those regions had a moist climat, and was carped by grasses, and forests, forthermore, there were many sorts of the trees like as: "oaks", "nut's trees", "olive's trees"...and the period of the drawings and the rock arts (about 3000) wich are conserved on the walls, cliffs, show us there were several human groups, and that two human races followed together in living in the desert. the first group was black, and he disappeared in the end of the seventh century b.c., and the second one was white, which appeared to have lived in that region from the beginnig of the sixth millennium b.c., this last one was mentioned by tattooes on his body in the drawings that were mad in his time (camps, I, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44; h. j. hugot, I,II), this geografical and historical data are supported by berber languistic data wich tell that the big sahara was not a desert from the beginning, [...] this is translated from the book of mohamed chafiq "hafriyyat fi allogha [archrology in the language] [This message has been edited by Mazigh (edited 25 August 2005).] [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3