...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
OT - Human genes NY times article
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Clyde Winters: [QB] rasol [QUOTE] Thus, for example, if you claim the Dravidians were in so and so place, at so and so time, not only do you need archeology and linguistics to back your claims, but your hypothesis has to also take into account Dravidian gene pool, as well as the socio-ethnic complex of any potential inhabitants of the locales involved. [/QUOTE]I don't think you need genetic evidence to support linguistic, anthropological and archaeological evidence. Just because the genes don't support a fact does not make the genetic evidence correct. If archaeology, linguistics and anthropological research support a conclusion , while genetic research does not it says that the genetic research is incorrect. People accept the genetic evidence because "surprisingly" it supports a Eurocentric view of the world. This is why so many new comers to this forum see you guys as Afrocentric researchers, which you are not, because of the way you interpret the genetic research you read. You can pretend to yourselves that race does not exist, here on this forum . And that genes, not facial features and skin color determine and explain who we are; but in the real world, and even in the genetic papers you cite race is paramount. Aluta continua (The struggle continues) . [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3