...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
18th dynast were haplogroup R1b/K?
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by the lioness,: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Swenet: [qb] [QUOTE]Originally posted by the lioness,: https://images2.imgbox.com/d8/52/M7ZLPlhP_o.png [/QUOTE]Just something to consider if you really want to investigate if this is R-V88 (goes for Askia, too, who says he suspects Tut has V88). You have to look at the ISOGG tables and confirm that R1b1a2 was V88 at the time of this article. You can't assume that the writer did it's homework and got it right [URL=https://images2.imgbox.com/d8/52/M7ZLPlhP_o.png]in the followup article[/URL]. https://isogg.org/tree/ Nomenclature changes, e.g. E-M2's position changed from E3a, to E1b1a to E1b1a1. [/qb][/QUOTE][IMG]https://images2.imgbox.com/43/a2/39Tomqoh_o.png[/IMG] https://www.igenea.us/en/tutankhamun As we know this European DNA testing company leaked what they had seen on a computer screen in a documentary on DNA analysis of Tut (I think Hawass team) of which the results were never published (Why ??). iGENEA claimed the above alleles were on the screen which was filmed in distracting motion and at times blurry. At the bottom of this Tutankhamen page which is still on their website they are selling testing kits. Anyway the media then picked up on this. I am wondering how Reuters said [i]"The results showed that King Tut belonged to a genetic profile group, known as haplogroup R1b1a2, to which more than 50 percent of all men in Western Europe belong, indicating that they share a common ancestor. Among modern-day Egyptians this haplogroup contingent is below 1 percent, according to iGENEA."[/i] https://www.reuters.com/article/britain-tutankhamun-dna-idAFL3E7J135P20110801 ___________________________ How is it Cruciani said in 2010 R1b1a2 was a V88 clade and Reuters said in 2011 that iGENEA said Tut was R1b1a2 but iGENEA said it was M269 on their website something is rotten in Denmark If R1b1a2 aka V88 is correct then Reuters had the right Haplogroup yet were using the iGENEA description of R-M269 which was that is was basic European rather than this unique sub clade which has such high frequencies in Cameroon and significant frequencies in berbers of the Siwa oasis , Egypt Perhaps iGENEA had first interpreted R1b1a2, Reuters made an article and then iGENEA changed it later to M269 [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3