...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Unknown Man E and Ramses III Y haplogroup
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by zarahan aka Enrique Cardova: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Djehuti: [qb] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Doug M: [qb] This is just more proof that KMT was a pan African culture no different than Kerma as discussed on another thread. Head binding in the 18th dynasty is strongly reminiscent of similar traditions from more modern Congo. This cannot be just a mere coincidence. Kerma "pan African" article thread: http://www.egyptsearch.com/forums/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=8;t=010308 Also the Abusir El Melek DNA did get a lot of fanfare as it is part of the ongoing effort by Egyptology to associate ancient KMT with the "Near East". Even though that requires selective sampling of ancient remains and misleading and fraudulent claims about what lineages should and could have been where in prehistory. [/qb][/QUOTE]I disagree with the term "pan-African" as neither Egypt nor Kerma involved all Africans. These were regional powers that involved the peoples within the region of northeast Africa. The same way Greece is never identified as "Pan-European" civilization, simply a civilization of the locality of southeastern Europe-- the Balkans. Ironically the very origins of Greek civilization and its people make it clear that Greece not Egypt is a much better candidate to be labeled "Near Eastern". [/qb][/QUOTE]Break that down more. In what way are the Greeks a better candidate to be labeled "Near Eastern"? [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3