...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Measuring the significance of sub-Saharan bloodlines in the Neolithic Expansion(s)!
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Charlie_Bass: [QB] As I've said, I'm not soothing anything or anyone, I just call it the way I see it. Calling genes and lineages black African derived and Caucasoid is wrong. I'm not going to get into war over semantics, I've already repeated too many times that E3b1-M78 alpha descends from an ancestral E3b1 thats sub-saharan East African in origin and thats as far as I'm taking it, no more no less. No one is denying this. E3b1-M78 alpha is just one small part of the southern European genome and it holds no higher significance than all the other parts of the genome in southern Europeans. If black is a political and social construct, that makes the statement "black African derived" political and social, but *NOT* scientific nor genetic, so why use that phrase? Thats the meat of my point. I'm not soothing anyone, I equally disagree with Evil Euro's and Dienekes statements of "racial clusters" based on genetic studies that they do not understand or plain misinterpret and distort. I simply interpret studies in the manner the authors wish to convey without adding any special significance to them. [This message has been edited by Charlie_Bass (edited 19 October 2005).] [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3