...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Tut-ankh-amun's lineage
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Jim Stinehart: [QB] Supercar: Why do you keep asking me questions about an article that you cited? You're the one who's interested in the KV 55 mummy's teeth, not me. I myself am excited to talk about Smenkhkare being lame. That's how we can figure out what happened at Amarna. I'll let you be the expert on the KV 55 mummy's teeth. Why on earth do you, or anyone else, care what Jim Stinehart thinks about the KV 55 mummy's teeth? 1. Egyptologists are well aware of Jim Harris' work. 2. Egyptologists have not found Jim Harris' study very convincing as to the question of the age of the KV 55 mummy, given the raft of other scientific studies which have come up with lower ages for the KV 55 mummy. 3. Who the heck cares if Jim Stinehart has "misunderstood" what that Jim Harris article says? I ain't no dentist, that's for sure. So if you want to insist that Jim Stinehart has "misunderstood" the Jim Harris article, that's fine. It doesn't change anything. The Jim Harris article has failed to convince Egyptologists. That's what counts. Nobody wants to hear what Jim Stinehart has to say about the KV 55 mummy's teeth, because I have no dental expertise. But I can look at all those Amarna images of a lame, young, male pharaoh. That's what I'm interested in. If you don't mind, I am not going to post further about the KV 55 mummy's teeth. If I have "misunderstood" that Jim Harris article you cite, then fine. It doesn't make any difference anyway, since the entire Egyptology profession is well aware of Jim Harris' study of the mummies' teeth, and the majority view of professional Egyptologists remains that the KV 55 mummy is Smenkhkare, a male pharaoh who lived to age 20 -26. I myself go with the majority view of Egyptologists on this particular issue, and it matters not whether I have "misunderstood" your Jim Harris article or not, or whether you think I have "dodged" whatever questions you may be asking about that article. Smenkhkare was a lame, male pharaoh who died in his early 20s. We know that from all those images I have cited. That is one of the key facts about Amarna, regardless of who the KV 55 mummy may be. Smenkhkare's lameness is what is the important issue concerning Amarna, in my humble opinion, not anything about the teeth of the KV 55 mummy. Jim Stinehart [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3