...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
OT: Africoid Shang, Olmecs, Sumerians and Indians
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by osirion: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by SidiRom: [qb] [QUOTE]Originally posted by rasol: [qb] Suppose we posit that the Olmecs were related to Pacific peoples including Polynesian, Melanesian and/or Australian....as well as possibly Northern Asians. What would be wrong with that theory? What facts would show the above theory to be flawed? I'm just asking. [/qb][/QUOTE]Polynesians are a recent group, and no evidence of contact. Australian Aborigines, possibly. IF you look at the Yamana, Luzia and Aborigines, it could easily have been from anicent migrations. [/qb][/QUOTE]Perhaps I am using outdated classifications. There are some racial models that have 4 distinct groups: Caucasians, Negroes, Mongols and Polynesians. Pacific Island people and Australians belong to the racial group Polynesian under such system. I realize that such a system is unscientific but this is what I meant. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3