...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
African cultures and stone building
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by osirion: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Djehuti: [qb] [QUOTE]Originally posted by osirion: [qb] You mean you want me to produce evidence that there is more AE artifacts of glassware, naturalistic art and architecture than any other African society outside of the Nile Valley groups? Propesterous! Why should I do that. It is rather simple for anyone who has studied African history to see that AE is rich in arhitectural and artistic atifacts, we still haven't found 80% of it. I agree that the culture of AE is absolutely African and not much different than the rest of Africa but the technology used to produce the artifacts is an entirely different issue.[/qb][/QUOTE]Whether or not Egypt and the Nile Valley as a whole had the most material wealth in terms of artifacts and architecture is irrelevant. Greece and the Mediterranean coasts also have the greatest examples of artifacts and architecture in Europe. What's your point? [QUOTE][qb]Perhaps the synergy of cultural trade brought about the difference? The Eurocentric model has been profoundly dealt a blow since there's little evidence of IndoEuropean genetic flow into Egypt. However, we cannot deny the potential of the impact of trade.[/qb][/QUOTE]As stated before, no genetic marker has been conclusively identified for Indo-Europeans. As such, there has been little evidence of Indo-European genetic flow in India, Central Asia, and even Europe for that matter! Also, the Eurocentrics have other models besides that of the Indo-European one. There is still the pervasive model of non Indo-European Near-Eastern "kacazaoids", such as "caucasoid" Semites. Speaking of which.. [QUOTE][qb]Traveling Hebrews spreading ideas that when mixed with the indigenous African technologies produces something new and unique. Doesn't impact culture but would change the landscape of the technologies used to exhibit such culture in architecural and artistic ways. Egypt lies in the crossroads of trade between the Kushitic people and the Semitic. Trade routes have existed for thousand of years precisely through Egypt. The exchange of ideas have a way of building upon each other to produce ingenius solutions.[/qb][/QUOTE][b]LOL[/b] :D So you are still professing your theory of a (Jewish)Hebrew-helping-hand in the development of Egyptian civilization. Can you give us any evidence of such a claim? [QUOTE][qb]All a bunch of armchair logic ;-) [/qb][/QUOTE]And your little theory isnt? [/qb][/QUOTE]Yes I am Hebrewcentric so to me I am still looking for evidence supporting the impact of migrant Hebrews. There's plenty of evidence supporting the impact of Hebrew people in Greece. The question is whether or not we can correlate J2 Haplogroup with Hebrews. Also, I was referring to my logic as being armchair logic. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3