...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
18th dynast were haplogroup R1b/K?
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Swenet: [QB] Lioness: "The confusing identity of R1b1a2" There is no such thing as an identity to R1b1a2. M269 and V88, and so on, are the identities. The R1b1a2 part is the position. It's [b]code[/b] for where the mutation falls within R. That is why new mutations like E-V38 can demote E-M2 from E1b1a to E1b1a1. That extra 1 behind it signifies a specific position that helps haplogroup enthusiasts visualize or illustrate the position of E-M2 relative to other mutations. "not resolved by year" It is not the New Year's transition that changes the R1b tree. It's work on the R1b tree by geneticists (and hobbyists) that changes the Y-DNA tree. And yes, sometimes geneticists still use dated nomenclature like E3b (which is now E1b1b). That doesn't mean organizations like ISOGG weren't set up for people to keep track of the changes. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3