...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
The Black Land/soil nonsense put to bed... no pun intended!
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by alTakruri: [QB] The internal black/red designations is not an unknown. Again, it's something I explained here and on TNV years ago. A Fulani is not a red in the same sense that a Frenchman is. === So you reject the Book of Gates passage where AEs label themselves and Nehesu as members of KM.t[nwt]? In that sacred afterlife assuring text the DSHR.t[nwt] are considered of different divine genesis and under different divine protection. AE's considered the blacks as related They didn't see themselves related to the reds. Anyone looking at any painting of BG4:5s30 can see the obvious skin colour difference. Both sets of reds are much lighter than the AEs no matter whose tomb painting is viewed. In one tomb painting the AEs are depicted the exact same greybrown complexion as the Nehesu. It's not my job to convince or force agreement. The facts have been laid out. Whether one allows or discards them is up to oneself. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3