...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Tut-ankh-amun's lineage
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by René: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Djehuti: [qb] Yes, it seems Jim is caught up in and miseled by his so-called theories that he cannot see the big picture, let alone questions which validate whether his notions are true. He is a proponent of this site here: http://www.reneodeay.com/galleryindex.htm [/qb][/QUOTE]Djehuti, Will you please quit doing that? Using my fantasy gallery page made for readers of my NOVEL about Prince Tut. The site is about a Novel, not a scholarly tract. A Novel! that means 'Fiction'! I see you also borrowed a picture from my pages to post on this forum. You should know that I have spent 40 years researching this novel. But, as I do not have any degree in Egyptology or archaeology, I cannot and do not claim to be an authority. I do agree with Most of what Jim Stinehart has to say about Tut's parentage, the major exception: the death in childbirth of Sitamen. She did go by another name during the time Akhenaten outlawed the use of 'Amen'. I recognize the arguments he has used and the references, and feel he has answered most of your silly questions, and feel he has come to the same conclusions on his own. Others share this opinion, believe it or not. So, you see he does not use MY theory about what happened over 3,300 years ago in Ancient Egypt, nor has he used any reference or link to my site that I have so far seen. I do not appreciate your disparagement. Other real Egyptologists do not share your low opinions of My theory, or of Jim's. René O'Deay [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3