...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Tut-ankh-amun's lineage
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Supercar: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Jim Stinehart: 6. Everyone agrees that the KV 55 mummy bears a very close resemblance to Tut's mummy, both as to blood, and as to overbite and facial bones. The majority view is that the KV 55 mummy is 23-year-old Smenkhkare, whereas the minority view is that the KV 55 mummy is 35-year-old Akhenaten, but much less is riding on that dispute than is often thought... [/QUOTE]Interesting appeal to logical fallacy, but now let us talk about the 'validity' of the methods utilized to produce those age estimates; how about 'invalidating' the methodology used to come up with the latter age [i.e. 35 years old], vs. the one used to determine the former [i.e. 23 years old]? [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3