...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Siwan Language
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Swenet: [QB] [QUOTE]ORiginally posted by The Explorer: People like swenet have to be clued on it, who denies that the Maghrebi series has close morphological relationships with other Africans. The authors noting of the temporal range is interestingly, in that it may well speak to that potential factor of environment I noted about elsewhere, in the modification of the EpiPaleolithic Maghrebi series.[/QUOTE]This is yet another example of the fact that you simply do not know how to interpret physical anthropology. They're comparing Late Pleistocene generalized AMHs and African holocene remains with a retention of a similar UP physique, re: 'Mechtoid' (or 'generalized' when the said physique is discussed in the context of non-African populations). The Hassi el Abiod, Asselar man and other Mechtoid [b]Sub-Saharan[/b] remains simply have dual cranio-metric ties, both with Sub-Saharan Africans on the one hand, and on the other hand, with other generalized remains both in Northern Africa, as well as UP Europe. It has, for instance, been noted for a long time that Asselar man shows relationships with European UP fossils, as well as with modern Sub Saharan African populations, and the same observations have been made for the Mesolithic Nubians samples. That, however, does not mean Ibero-Maurusians have the same dual ties with modern Sub-Saharan Africans--they don't. That coastal North African Ibero-Maurusians and the 'Mechtoid' Saharan populations like Hassi el albiod and Asselar mostly have superficial, size/'generalized' related ties, can be seen in the fact that their mandible measurements are worlds apart in the 'shape' department. When the Saharan (Hassi el abiod etc) and coastal Mechtoid populations (Ibero-Maurusians) are allowed to plot along a 'shape' dimension, all Sub-Saharan MSA, LSA and Saharan Mechtoid populations seperate from the North African coastal Ibero-Maurusian and Capsian populations: [QUOTE]In the sum, the results obtained further strengthen the results from previous analyses. The affinities between Nazlet Khater, MSA, and Khoisan and Khoisan related groups re-emerges. [b]In addition it is possible to detect a separation between North African and sub-saharan populations[/b], with the Neolithic Saharan population from Hasi el Abiod and the Egyptian Badarian group being closely affiliated with modern Negroid groups. Similarly, the Epipaleolithic populations from Site 117 and Wadi Halfa are also affiliated with sub-Saharan LSA, Iron Age [b]and modern Negroid groups rather than with contemporaneous North African populations such as Taforalt and the Ibero-maurusian.[/b][/QUOTE]---Vermeersch, 2003 [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3