...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
The Peopling Of The Sahara During the Holocene/Green Sahara
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by the lioness,: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Djehuti: [QB] ^ Indeed such facts about the origins and formation of Egyptian people and culture have been known by academia for a while now, yet are largely unknown by the general public. Hence, why the fallacy of the division between 'North' and 'Sub-Sahara' [/QUOTE]The proper distinction is between the Mahgreb and the Sahel beacause the Sahel is comprised of ancestry which is primarily Sub Saharan African while the Maghreb on average is not. Egyptian civilization is a different situation because it is based on the Nile river which extends further south into Sub Saharan Africa as well as being a country with the only land route to Asia. For instance someone could raise the issue of who were the Sahelians? But no one seems to care to. And if someone said they are primarily African somebody else could say "but they are North African and North Africans have significant ancestry from outside of Africa" That is why the term "North African" should be used less or anot at all in many cases. It is too broad. In many cases it is best to talk about the Maghreb, the Sahel and Egypt instead of "North Africa" But I think people want "North Africa" to be used so they have the flexibility to say what ever is said about it is wrong and this can be done by people of different viewpoints. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3