...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Ancient Egypt Africa Cultural Diffusion ?
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Rain King: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by AncientGebts: [qb] I publish books not for people interested in Egypt, but instead for libraries. Because people, even those with PhDs are naturally going to resist my findings. Only years, long after I'm dead and gone, will my work be able to be seriously evaluated by distant generations in the future. People who are not being strangled by today's status quo. So my books are in major universities around the world. I don't publish for the money. And by the way, though he may regret it now, but you can find that Asaur quoted me in one of his books. But what he quoted has never been publicly refuted by any scholar. [/qb][/QUOTE]What's interesting about this connection is that these Ethiopians in particular are Semitic speakers. Now while there is good evidence of Semitic having origins in Northeast Africa, the language itself is almost exclusively associated with movements of people from the Near East. That being said the genesis of Semitic speaking people having an origin in Northeast Africa adjacent to the areas of early Nile Valley civilization could perhaps account for the affinities seen in the language. The fact that they are "Ethio-SEMITIC" means that they came back INTO Africa via the Horn from the Late Period of Kemet onward. Kemet was NEVER "Semitic". [IMG]https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-6V0Ge1UTh9M/V0uZbkvhhZI/AAAAAAAACbo/BWIPhxO39QgVQ60W9LAO3QTuD-DLk7s5gCLcB/s1600/kitchens2009_afroasiatic_semitic_africa_origin.jpg[/IMG] Therefore their history logically cannot be tied with ancient Kemet. These people DO NOT EVEN CLAIMS an origin in ancient Kemet. Semitic has been found in the Near East as early as 5,400 BC. The only thing popping in Northeast Africa at this time was Ta Seti/"Nubia" (assumed to stretch back to 5,900 BC). Their linguistic origins in adjacent Northeast Africa perhaps, but if that is the case then I'm quite certain that their language affinities can also be seen with Bantu speakers as well. Since ancient Kemet was a Bantu language. The annoying part about these Hamitic Hypothesis guys is that they WILL NOT TOUCH any argument dealing with Bantu affinities to the ancient civilization that they IMPLY that they have strict ownership of. You're not really gonna step to Obenga or any of his students with ANY Hamitic Hypothesis nonsense, but you will still try to pass it off as the unchallenged truth. Kind of cowardly in my opinion. If you're gonna stand on it then STAND ON IT, don't make subtle implications. If you have a problem with my argument then SAY IT. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3