...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
"North Africans" genetic tests collection.
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Baalberith: [QB] You haven’t contradicted anything I posted! All you did was repost the same crap that was already addressed, multiple times! But like always with you people you ignored! I posted a dozen times that the Eurasians that migrated back to Africa 40,000 years ago did not have a predominant affect on North Africans because they were eventually absorbed by the prehistoric Africans that was already present in North Africa and the Afrasian speakers of Eastern Africa! “Haplogroup E1b1b (formerly known as E3b) represents the last major direct exodus from Africa into Europe believed to have appeared first in the Horn of Africa about 26,000 years ago and scattered to North Africa and the Near East during the late Paleolithic and Mesolithic periods. E1b1b lineages are closely linked to the diffusion of Afro-asiatic languages.” “The highest genetic diversity of haplogroup E1b1b is noted in Northeast Africa region in Ethiopia and Somalia, which also have the monopoly of older and rarer sub-clades like M281, V6 or V92.” Source: https://haplomaps.com/y-haplogroup-e/ Not only that, I also stated that these same Eurasians wouldn’t have looked like modern contemporary Middle Easterners (Eurasians) in the first place, but the Africans they intermixed with! [b]”The surprise is that the Neolithic peoples of Europe and their Bronze Age successors are not closely related to the modern inhabitants, although the prehistoric/modern ties are somewhat more apparent in southern Europe. It is a further surprise that the Epipalaeolithic Natufian of Israel from whom the Neolithic realm was assumed to arise has a clear link to Sub-Saharan Africa.”[/b] Source: A Revised Root for the Human Y Chromosomal Phylogenetic Tree: The Origin of Patrilineal Diversity in Africa [b]“early West Asians resemble Africans.“[/b] Source: (Hanihara T. Comparison of craniofacial features of major human groups. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1996 Mar;99(3):389-412.) [b]Prehistoric Eurasian[/b] [IMG]https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1200/1*52eSO1-81PZ78HJH5Szg1Q.jpeg[/IMG] Natufian reconstruction [b]Egyptian depictions Eurasians of Antiquity[/b] [IMG]https://qph.fs.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-76ae580491f229c795b266e308b2791f-c[/IMG] A stelle of a Canaanite mercenary drinking beer, while his son serves him and his wife looks on [IMG]https://i.pinimg.com/originals/ed/d6/99/edd6991c67f039359679d6ae6fa7aa34.jpg[/IMG] Depiction of bound [b]Libyan[/b], Nubian, and [b]Asiatic[/b] captives on King Tutankhamen’s footstool [IMG]https://i.pinimg.com/originals/11/b4/e0/11b4e0704064f1b0e99ad066997409d8.jpg[/IMG] A depiction of bound captive from Aegean isles or near the Eastern Mediterranean, from the same site [IMG]https://osirisnet.net/tombes/nobles/kheru/photo/kherouef_rb_0104.jpg[/IMG] A depiction of a bound captive Peityu-shu, from Desert of the East, from the tomb of Senaa My thread: http://www.egyptsearch.com/forums/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=15;t=012935;p=1#000000 You keep on spamming the same exact nonsensical bullshit we have already addressed, but you keep dismissing it because you are a sick deluded nationalistic Farq with a identity crisis! Your Geneticists that you keep praising as revealers of the truth don’t take into account what makes a North African a North African! For example, take a look at this image showing genetic results of the Egyptian population. [IMG]https://qph.fs.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-4687f4017e585a1b228b6c11f956b34c[/IMG] Source: https://genographic.nationalgeographic.com/reference-populations-next-gen/ Note that you see the regional affiliations of the Egyptian population, with North African as a genetic category. The DNA of modern Egyptians is shown to be approximately 68% North African, 17% Arabian, 4% Jewish Diaspora (whatever that is), 3% Asia Minor, 3% Southern Europe, and 3% Eastern African, ironic. Now, you would think that these genetic results would show the Egyptian people’s regional affiliations and you wouldn’t be necessarily wrong. Egyptians are North Africans, but this is misleading as it doesn’t show what makes North Africans North African. It’s when you break down this category that you see what’s makes up the Egyptian population as shown here in the updated data of the Egyptian population! National Geographic’s Updated Egyptian Results [IMG]https://qph.fs.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-811a6b7dbc424299a489e6f9d0c1579f[/IMG] Source: https://genographic.nationalgeographic.com/reference-populations/ Now, the results has changed. Replacing the “North African category and showing the results of Middle Easterner, as well as Sub Saharan African affiliations in modern Egyptians as much higher! The results shows that the Egyptians are approximately 65%, 18% Middle Easterner, and 14% Sub Saharan African. Although, “Mediterranean” is also difficult to grasp on, as much “North African”. But assuming that they must be focusing on the geographical region of Southern Europe (most of the Mediterranean), let’s just say this is an accurate prediction of contemporary Egyptians. Also, before you say something stupid, understand this! What this means is, the modern Egyptians as a group are not closely affiliated to their ancient counterparts (indigenous Africans) of 5,000 years ago. As the genetics prove, they are mostly the descendants of foreigners who emigrated to the country over thousands of years. It has nothing to do with their continuity with their ancestors, but a discontinuity with them! Your spams of Coastal North Africans and their DNA results as predominantly North African is all but useless, as some Geneticists don’t consider the North African population as something to be broken down. In part this has to do with the heterogeneous nature of North Africans. Thus, Geneticists are forced to consider the makeup of the North African population as you guess it, North African! The same thing can apply to any significant heterogeneous population, Middle Easterners for example. So far, all of your examples of “pure” and “indigenous” North Africans, only leads to questions about their actual genetic make up, because a category showing your 100% North African is not revealing any, but you already knew this. Also, regarding your insane spams, as I said before in my previous posts from months ago during our interactions, North Africa was heavily influenced by Mediterranean populations like the Greeks and Romans! Showing a image of a Goddess or art from aristocratic buildings with obviously Mediterranean influences (the art style is a great giveaway) is not showing what the common North African looked liked! “[b]To what extent Carthaginians employed Negro slaves is doubtful. Punic cemeteries have yielded numerous skulls of a negroid character, and there were some very dark-skinned Africans, perhaps negroes, in the Carthaginian army which invaded Sicily early in the fifth century B.C.[/b] Frontinus tells us that as prisoners they were paraded naked before the Greeks soldiery in order to bring the Carthaginians into contempt. On the other hand, as the Carthaginians customarily enslaved prisoners of war and the victims of their piracy, two sources of supply which they must have found very fruitful, [b]they were far from being dependent on Africa for slave labour[/b]. It is unlikely that [b]they hesitated to enslaved as many Berbers as they required[/b], nor were so brutal a people likely to have drawn the line at doing the same to their own peasantry. The evidence of negro blood, is, however, significant and it seems probable that they imported slaves from the Fezzan. It was a likely source, for the Garamantes cannot have hunted the Troglodyte Ethiopians except to enslave them. The slave trade with the Fezzan may have been important to the Carthaginians, [b]but there are no grounds for assuming that it was[/b].” Source: The golden trade of the Moors: West African kingdoms in the fourteenth century, By E. W. Bovill, Robin Hallet, pp. 21-22 “In the Punic burial grounds, [b]negroid remains were not rare and there were black auxiliaries in the Carthaginian army who were certainly not Nilotics[/b]. Furthermore, if we are to believe Diodorus(XX, 57.5), a lieutenant of Agathocles in [b]northern Tunisia[/b] at the close of the fourth century before our era overcame [b]a people who skin was similar to the Ethiopian. There is much evidence of the presence of 'Ethiopians' on the southern borders of Africa Minor[/b]. Throughout the classical period, mention is also made of peoples belonging to intermediate races, the Melano-Getules, or Leuco-Ethiopians in particular in Ptolemy.” Source: General History of Africa: Ancient civilizations of Africa By G. Mokhtar, Unesco. International Scientific Committee for the Drafting of a General History of Africa, p. 427 I won’t even addressed your other spams, like your Temehu Libyans, that was explained to you already! [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3