...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Ancient Egypt Africa Cultural Diffusion ?
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Big O: [QB] To Djheuti's sock puppet...STFU and respond to this post that you ran from twice; "Start out by responding to the shyt that you ran from in the other thread; lol No I don't. The evidence speaks for itself supreme cultural continuity from Khamet into contemporary Equatorial Africa and vicinity. Once again we see the Khametic religion on display among peoples in Western Africa supporting a migration from Nile Valley civilization. [IMG]https://hosting.photobucket.com/images/u440/Treday90/mia_.1893c.jpg[/IMG] [IMG]https://hosting.photobucket.com/images/u440/Treday90/Tut_coffinette.jpg[/IMG] The Nok civilization was the first agricultural civilization in West Africa, and that only makes sense as even admitted by White academia to have diffused from Nile Valley civilization; [IMG]https://hosting.photobucket.com/images/u440/Treday90/IMG_6392.jpg[/IMG] The History of Crop Cultivation in West Africa: A Bibliographical Guide M. A. Havinden You have agriculture coming from Nile Valley civilization, and you have Nile Valley religion coming into Western Africa as a result of a wholescale movement of people between 2,000 and 1,500 BC. Now is there context behind why there may have been a migration during this period? Did the Hyksos dominate parts of Khamet and the Sinai which were formerly owned by natives? There were natives in that region despite the bulk of the peoples being in the south. We know that because the Hyksos were reportedly brutal to the natives in the region. So we have a circumstance (hostile takeover/war) that warrants a migration of people during the period when the Nok (& Olmec ;) ) civilization begins to spring up. "Tracing the Bantu Expansion from its source" The Greenbergian theory of the Bantu migration from Cameroon has been debunked on every level. No genetic evidence from early West-Central African to Southern suggest the presence of the Bantu. Not not to mention it FAILS to explain why E-M2 dominates the Western Sahara as well. Archaeology nor ecology supports this theory. Not to mention NO BANTU'S claim this Greenbergian theory of their origin. Here is the criticism of the theory that was OMMITED in the final version of UNESCO 1974; [IMG]https://oi1067.photobucket.com/albums/u440/Treday90/Babtu-debunk2%201_zpscckyvfct.jpg[/IMG] [i]UNESCO deleted S. Lwanga-Lunyiigo on 'Bantu movement' from the paperback. Even in the 1988 they apologized for printing SLL's original contribution which begins: "Basing my conclusion on archaeological evidence, I suggested recently that the speakers of Bantu languages occupied from very early times a broad swath of territory [b]running from the Great Lakes region of East Africa to the shores of the Atlantic in Zaire and that the supposed movement of Bantu speakers from West Africa to central, eastern, and southern Africa did not take place.[/b] [24]" [24] Lwanga-Lunyiigo, S. (1976) The Bantu problem reconsidered Current Anthropology 17,2, pp. 282-6" [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3