posted
Many Copts claim that they are the descendants of Ancient Egyptians, while Muslims are migrant Arabs or others.
This is simply not true.
When Alexander the great entered Egypt in 332 B.C., the Ancient Egyptians who are a mix race of East Africans and Near Eastern people themselves further intermixed with Hittites, Nubians, Libyans, Assyrians and Nubians.
In the following 1000 years Greek and Roman influence on the racial make up of the residents of Egypt was very apparent in many pictures of that time.
The Copts who are the Egyptians who had not entered Islam were Indigenous Egyptian and every other race that entered Egypt in its Eight Thousand years before the Arabs entering in 638 AD. WITH 4000 Soldiers with the leadership of Amr Ibn Al'as.
Egyptians who converted to Islam intermixed further with Arabs and Turks. Does this make them more related to Ancient Egypt, it does not. No one in Egypt is a pure indigenous Egyptian.
And never was Egypt since the start of its history, 7000 years ago having a pure race of anything.
posted
AMR1 - About the ONLY accurate thing that you wrote is below..
In the following 1000 years Greek and Roman influence on the racial make up of the residents of Egypt was very apparent in many pictures of that time.
Where did you get the rest of the nonsense that you wrote?
BTW to help you along in your learning: there were no such people as Hittites, thats a myth, just like your post. Or as some would say: wishful thinking.
Posts: 22721 | Registered: Oct 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
AMR1 - Before going out into the world and making claims, you should at least make an effort to check the accuracy of what you say. So far, everything that you have said has been inaccurate. Please educate yourself FIRST, post later!
Posts: 22721 | Registered: Oct 2005
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Mike111: AMR1 - Before going out into the world and making claims, you should at least make an effort to check the accuracy of what you say. So far, everything that you have said has been inaccurate. Please educate yourself FIRST, post later!
Mike
You should read about hittites more before claiming they don't exist, and than you can advise others about reading.
Posts: 1090 | From: Merowe-Nubia | Registered: May 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
AMR1 - Hittites are just another myth created by Whites to embellish their non-existent part in mankind's history. Just as Turk, Greek and Roman descendants are doing now, in North Africa and the Middle East. The fact is: Whites had NO part in the creation of civilization, AND Turks, Greeks and Romans are conquers of North Africa and the Middle East, they have no claim to anything other than the land that they conquered. The following is from the encyclopedia..
The term "Hittites" is taken from the King James Bible (first published in 1611), which is a translation of the first Bible: The Greek Septuagint plus the Greek new Testament. The Hebrew words in question: translate as the "Children of Heth". But this is a Canaanite group in the Bible.
Because of the insurmountable problems associated with trying to prove the existence of the Hittites: many researchers have now come to the conclusion that there never really was a Caucasian Empire in Anatolia at all, they speculate that the so-called Hittite empire, is really a confusion with that of the Hattians, Phrygians, Chaldeans, Babylonians. And that is why neither ancient Greek or any other ancient historians ever mentioned it.
Posts: 22721 | Registered: Oct 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
AMR1, didn't someone in your family ever tell you that you're supposed to put your draws on "after" not before you wash your boodie.
Posts: 3085 | Registered: Jan 2008
| IP: Logged |
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
Printer-friendly view of this topic