Well. About time white supremists and those viewing whites as recently invading northern, western, and southern Europe displacing indigenous populations are on the same page. Three cheers for the honesty found among Aryans on this matter.
Most modern day Whites are to the greatest part, either direct descendents of the great wave of White peoples who swept into Europe from around 4000 BC to around 500 BC - these people, Nordic in terms of the White racial sub-groupings, had their original heartlands in the region known today as central and southern Russia (hence Whites are often today called Caucasians - after the Caucasus mountains which are situated in the southern reaches of that country. It is still unknown precisely what caused these Indo-European peoples to start migrating. Recent research indicates that the flooding of the Black Sea Basin from the Mediterranean - established as a factual occurence - was the probable cause of the first great movements. With the aid of the horse, the first Indo-Europeans moved in all directions, disrupting the slow but steady pace of development everywhere they went. Large numbers settled in Northern Europe, staying there till they later began again to move south; others moved off to the Middle and Near East, while others ventured west crossing into Britain and Spain. These Nordics slowly crept westward, invading and re-invading western Euroope for a period of nearly 4000 years, finally resulting in the establishment of a new Nordic heartland in Northern Europe. Their great advantage over the already existing populations was that they brought with them the secret of iron-working; this is why they soon became known as the “battle axe people.
From this heartland in northern Europe - the womb of nations (vagina gentium, as the Romans called the region) successive waves of Indo-European Nordic invaders swept down over a period of centuries into all parts of Europe and into the Near East, conquering or displacing the people they found.
GRAVETTIAN AFRICANS OF UPPER PALEOLITHIC EUROPE
The above map of the White Supremists from their website, Stormfront, states that whites invaded northern Europe, southern and western Europe in addition to Asia, China, and the Middle East conquering and/or displacing the indigenous peoples found there - all this by their own admission. They note they are newcomers and not original peoples in the places they are now found. They have not noted that it was Africans (by phenotype) that they encountered wherever. they went. These often.descendents from Africans in Paleolithic Europe whose descendents lived down into more modern times; and until the time of the above invasions. My research produces evidence thatthe Ainu, prehistoric Indians, and many other peoples pre-dating whites in areas they are now found were African. So, their claims made on their map of Aryan peoples is fallacious.
__________
Whites supremists use the same map used by Marija Gimbutas to show white radiation from the Steppes from near 4000 BC. Scholars and white supremists are agreed on this matter.
And both the anthropological and archeological record leaves for us record that the carriers of R1 and its earliest derivatives were African (by phenotype).
posted
Marcus Garvey found white supremists useful also, but was ultimately unsuccessfully in convincing his fellow peers of the value of the association. Good luck.
Posts: 3595 | From: Moved To Mars. Waiting with shotgun | Registered: Dec 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
Modern White supremacists have no baggage from past teachings to account for, so they can afford to be truthful in this regard. Whereas White Academia, White religion, and the White scientific community, have a lot to answer for. By continuing to desperately hang onto their lies, they demonstrate that they still are unwilling to face the music.
Obviously their motivation is more complicated than simply not wanting to give Blacks their due. Just as Blacks were harmed by being taught from birth that they were less intelligent, less attractive, less capable, and naturally subservient; Whites greatly benefited from being taught just the reverse. The lies that they were taught; greatly enhanced their sense of self and ability. To secure this false sense of natural worth, Whites were segregated from Blacks to ensure that they would not have to compete with Blacks - competition would of course prove the lie immediately, so the institution of Racism was created - which we know well.
So what will be the consequence of truth? Nobody knows, but many are fearful that it will result in the collapse of the White psyche. Anyone noting the response of rasol, Djehuti, mmkay, and Knowledgeiskey718; to mountains of data proving their positions to be false, yet all the while they deny, can't help but think - correctly so - that there is more to it, much more.
Theirs is an emotional response to something that they are mentally unprepared to deal with, so they deny that it exists. So were White Academia, White religion, and the White scientific community, to cave-in to the truth, there would be no cover for people like this. They would have no choice but to accept that all they were taught, and all they though about themselves and their kind was a lie. The consequences of accepting this revelation would not be good and could ultimately lead to psychological meltdown. Anyone noting the condition of many Blacks, can see how devastating the loss of the sense of self-worth can be.Posts: 22721 | Registered: Oct 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
They need some Zymbabwe Zulus to show them a thing or two about reclaimation. Maybe the white part of the Khoisan.. . . .did I get that right?? or is it the reverse.
Posts: 12143 | From: When you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable | Registered: Jun 2007
| IP: Logged |
posted
. FIVE FEATURES OF SOME ALBINOS FOUND IN WHITES: (1) white skin, (2) straight hair, (3) blond hair, (4) blue eyes, and (5) freckles
Egmond Codfried provided the pictures that enabled me to see that indeed it was the African albino from which the white race of the Russian Steppes, the Caucasus Mountains arose; as (at least some) African (by morphology) albinos are not only (1) white skinned but (2) blond-haired, (3) straight haired (see pics #1, 7, and 9 for instance) and (4) blue-eyed as some of the 9 following pictures of Egmond show. And some show hair with a reddish tint as in the sixth photo of the short-haired sister:
Do others typically notice these four points of albinos that are the features of whites or am I the first to note these four (I know the skin certainly has been mentioned) as there is no doubt that whites emerged from albinos. And, the long nose to warm the cold air of the Caucasus where temperatures stay below 10 degrees in winters accounts for the longer nose of whites. Consider freckles as well as found in Ireland where there were Africans only until the time of Caesar.
(5) Irish have freckles which if we see picture 3, 5, and 12 with freckles, would appear to be "islands" of melanin harkening back to black skin. Even very light-skinned (but not albino) Africans often have freckles, these islands of melanin floating is a "sea" of white genes.
Also, just as albinos have skin easily damaged by the sun, many whites do as well. This being another example of how whites really did emerge from African albinos.
There is no mystery any longer of how and why the white race emerged.
Finally, Egmond's thread noted that the harsh treatment that albinos face from black-skinned Africans might historically have been the source of the universal hatred (until recent times; in ancient times, whites were attracted to African settlements but eventually always killed them off or intermarried to such an extent that the black origins were diluted to the point of unrecognition) that whites have (lesser in modern times) towards blacks.
. .
-------------------- The nature of homelife is the fate of the nation. Posts: 2334 | Registered: May 2006
| IP: Logged |
-------------------- The Complete Picture of the Past tells Us what Not to Repeat Posts: 7516 | From: Somewhere on Earth | Registered: Jan 2008
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Marc Washington: . FIVE FEATURES OF SOME ALBINOS FOUND IN WHITES: (1) white skin, (2) straight hair, (3) blond hair, (4) blue eyes, and (5) freckles
Egmond Codfried provided the pictures that enabled me to see that indeed it was the African albino from which the white race of the Russian Steppes, the Caucasus Mountains arose; as (at least some) African (by morphology) albinos are not only (1) white skinned but (2) blond-haired, (3) straight haired (see pics #1, 7, and 9 for instance) and (4) blue-eyed as some of the 9 following pictures of Egmond show. And some show hair with a reddish tint as in the sixth photo of the short-haired sister:
Do others typically notice these four points of albinos that are the features of whites or am I the first to note these four (I know the skin certainly has been mentioned) as there is no doubt that whites emerged from albinos. And, the long nose to warm the cold air of the Caucasus where temperatures stay below 10 degrees in winters accounts for the longer nose of whites. Consider freckles as well as found in Ireland where there were Africans only until the time of Caesar.
(5) Irish have freckles which if we see picture 3, 5, and 12 with freckles, would appear to be "islands" of melanin harkening back to black skin. Even very light-skinned (but not albino) Africans often have freckles, these islands of melanin floating is a "sea" of white genes.
Also, just as albinos have skin easily damaged by the sun, many whites do as well. This being another example of how whites really did emerge from African albinos.
There is no mystery any longer of how and why the white race emerged.
Finally, Egmond's thread noted that the harsh treatment that albinos face from black-skinned Africans might historically have been the source of the universal hatred (until recent times; in ancient times, whites were attracted to African settlements but eventually always killed them off or intermarried to such an extent that the black origins were diluted to the point of unrecognition) that whites have (lesser in modern times) towards blacks.
. .
Good question. Certainly debatable and valid as possible explaination for this phenomena. Are white a result of albino+color admixture or, are whites a lessened form of albinism?
Hard to believe that all this is caused by a deficit in Melanin production due to 1 mutated gene.
Mayo Clinic - Skin
Albinism: Causes
The cause of albinism is a mutation in one of several genes. Each of these genes provides the chemically coded instructions for producing one of several proteins involved in the production of melanin.
Types of Albinism
The system for classifying types of albinism is based primarily on which mutated gene caused the disorder rather than how it's manifested. Nonetheless, most types of albinism have some features that distinguish them from each other.
(MN: So does this mean these select mutated genes binned in the combination listed below may be used as markers to determine if a 5000 year old skull belonged to an albino or white?)
Types of albinism include:
* Oculocutaneous albinism. Oculocutaneous albinism is caused by a mutation in one of four genes. (5) These mutations result in signs and symptoms related to vision (ocular) and those related to skin (cutaneous), hair and iris color.
* Oculocutaneous albinism 1 is caused by a mutation in a gene on chromosome 11 . Most people with this type of albinism have milky white skin, white hair and blue eyes at birth. Some people with this disorder never experience changes in pigmentation, but others begin to produce melanin during childhood and adolescence. Their hair may become a golden blond or brown. Their skin usually doesn't change color, but it may tan somewhat. The irises may also change color and lose some of their translucence.
* Oculocutaneous albinism 2, caused by a mutation in a gene on chromosome 15 , is the most common form of the disorder worldwide. It's more common in Sub-Saharan Africans and African-Americans than in other population groups. In people of African descent, the hair is usually yellow, the eyes are blue-gray or tan, and the skin is white at birth. With sun exposure, the skin may over time develop freckles, moles or lentigines. In some cases, the skin may be light brown, and the hair may be brown, auburn, ginger or red.
In Caucasians with oculocutaneous albinism 2, the hair is usually blond, the skin white and the eyes blue at birth. The hair and eyes may darken. The skin usually develops freckles, moles or lentigines.
The rare oculocutaneous albinism 3, caused by a gene mutation on chromosome 9 , has been primarily identified in black South Africans. People with this disorder usually have reddish-brown skin, ginger or reddish hair, and hazel or brown eyes.
Oculocutaneous albinism 4, caused by a gene mutation on chromosome 5 , is a rare form of the disorder generally presenting signs and symptoms similar to those of type 2. Studies suggest that this type may be one of the most common forms of albinism among people of Japanese and Korean descent. *
X-linked ocular albinism. The cause of X-linked ocular albinism is a gene mutation on the X chromosome. (A woman inherits an X chromosome from each parent. A man inherits an X chromosome from his mother and a Y chromosome from his father.)
In order for a woman to have ocular albinism, she must inherit the gene mutation from both parents. A man with the disorder inherits the gene mutation from his mother. Because there's no corresponding gene on the Y chromosome, the single mutated gene on the X chromosome is sufficient to cause ocular albinism in a man.
People who have ocular albinism have the developmental and functional vision problems of albinism. But a person's skin, hair and eye color are generally in the normal range or slightly lighter for his or her family.
* Hermansky-Pudlak syndrome. Hermansky-Pudlak syndrome is a rare albinism disorder caused by one of at least seven mutated genes. People with this disorder have signs and symptoms like those of oculocutaneous albinism, but they also develop lung and bowel diseases and a bleeding disorder.
* Chediak-Higashi syndrome. C hediak-Higashi syndrome is a rare form of albinism caused by a mutation in a gene on chromosome 1 . Signs and symptoms are also similar to those of oculocutaneous albinism. The hair is usually brown or blond with a silvery sheen, and the skin is usually creamy white to grayish. People with this syndrome have a defect with white blood cells that results in a susceptibility to infections.
Oculocutaneous albinism 2, caused by a mutation in a gene on chromosome 15 , is the most common form of the disorder worldwide. It's more common in Sub-Saharan Africans and African-Americans than in other population groups. In people of African descent, the hair is usually yellow, the eyes are blue-gray or tan, and the skin is white at birth. With sun exposure, the skin may over time develop freckles, moles or lentigines. In some cases, the skin may be light brown, and the hair may be brown, auburn, ginger or red.
In Caucasians with oculocutaneous albinism 2, the hair is usually blond, the skin white and the eyes blue at birth. The hair and eyes may darken. The skin usually develops freckles, moles or lentigines.
[Marc writes] Seems like this hit the nail on the head. Seems like this must be the single mutated gene that produced the white race. I imagine that there was an tribe of black Africans in the Steppes who produced a larger number of albinos than others and that the albinos separated themselves. And through intermarriage, the selected gene perhaps once recessive became dominant.
And there you go – from a single locale in the Steppes, a truly new race was formed carrying on the R1 derivative from the original and darker-skinned Africans. And this is attested to from the maps of the radiation and spread of the white race by Gimbutas, the white supremacists, others. And filled with a hatred for what Africans may have done back then to albinos that carried on until the racism we see this very day. And filled with the genocide whites carried out on Africans wherever and whenever they went. Of course, if Africans had this kind of reaction to albinos in the Steppes of 4500 BC, there would have been instant and constant wars. Looks like this might be the cause for what otherwise would seem to be the irrational hatred that whites carry worldwide towards Africans (by phenotype).
Racial hatred springing from a stone age mythology of the significance of white skin and albinism held by African tribes. From the stone age carried into the modern age (as obviously it was ancient yet still exists today. What a trip.
How do you get racial reconciliation from that kind of history? Neither side is right, both have terribly wronged. Yet it seems that by this stage in the game, racial hatred and the desire of whites to destroy (as a rule, blacks don't automatically "hate" whites) oppress and eradicate Africans seems genetic.
. .
-------------------- The nature of homelife is the fate of the nation. Posts: 2334 | Registered: May 2006
| IP: Logged |
There are whites (notably some at Egypt Search) who argue that their race has always existed throughout the European continent. However, white racists themselves (as those of Stormfront presenting the history of the white race) note that whites recently invaded northern, western, and southern Europe - as their map below shows.
White racists would take argument with those at Egypt Search who have for years argued the opposite regarding whites and the question of Europe (itself named from the Phoenician, Europa, a woman of high origin - Phoenicians: morphologically African).
Well. About time white supremists and those viewing whites as recently invading northern, western, and southern Europe displacing indigenous populations are on the same page. Three cheers for the honesty found among Aryans on this matter.
Most modern day Whites are to the greatest part, either direct descendents of the great wave of White peoples who swept into Europe from around 4000 BC to around 500 BC - these people, Nordic in terms of the White racial sub-groupings, had their original heartlands in the region known today as central and southern Russia (hence Whites are often today called Caucasians - after the Caucasus mountains which are situated in the southern reaches of that country. It is still unknown precisely what caused these Indo-European peoples to start migrating. Recent research indicates that the flooding of the Black Sea Basin from the Mediterranean - established as a factual occurence - was the probable cause of the first great movements. With the aid of the horse, the first Indo-Europeans moved in all directions, disrupting the slow but steady pace of development everywhere they went. Large numbers settled in Northern Europe, staying there till they later began again to move south; others moved off to the Middle and Near East, while others ventured west crossing into Britain and Spain. These Nordics slowly crept westward, invading and re-invading western Euroope for a period of nearly 4000 years, finally resulting in the establishment of a new Nordic heartland in Northern Europe. Their great advantage over the already existing populations was that they brought with them the secret of iron-working; this is why they soon became known as the “battle axe people.
From this heartland in northern Europe - the womb of nations (vagina gentium, as the Romans called the region) successive waves of Indo-European Nordic invaders swept down over a period of centuries into all parts of Europe and into the Near East, conquering or displacing the people they found.
GRAVETTIAN AFRICANS OF UPPER PALEOLITHIC EUROPE
The above map of the White Supremists from their website, Stormfront, states that whites invaded northern Europe, southern and western Europe in addition to Asia, China, and the Middle East conquering and/or displacing the indigenous peoples found there - all this by their own admission. They note they are newcomers and not original peoples in the places they are now found. They have not noted that it was Africans (by phenotype) that they encountered wherever. they went. These often.descendents from Africans in Paleolithic Europe whose descendents lived down into more modern times; and until the time of the above invasions. My research produces evidence thatthe Ainu, prehistoric Indians, and many other peoples pre-dating whites in areas they are now found were African. So, their claims made on their map of Aryan peoples is fallacious.
__________
Whites supremists use the same map used by Marija Gimbutas to show white radiation from the Steppes from near 4000 BC. Scholars and white supremists are agreed on this matter.
And both the anthropological and archeological record leaves for us record that the carriers of R1 and its earliest derivatives were African (by phenotype).
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
![[Roll Eyes]](rolleyes.gif)
![[Big Grin]](biggrin.gif)
Printer-friendly view of this topic