posted
Why is it nearly all southerly people have been conquered by people of the north? What is it with northerners that make them capable of imposing themselves on their lower lying neighbors?
Posts: 2025 | Registered: Dec 2009
| IP: Logged |
posted
Define north and south example Romans conquered Britannia,Kush conquered Kemet conquered the people north of them,Axum conquered Kush,Moors conquered southern Europe the Inca conquered their northern neighbours etc, point out the north south divide first.
Posts: 6546 | From: japan | Registered: Feb 2009
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Gigantic: Why is it nearly all southerly people have been conquered by people of the north? What is it with northerners that make them capable of imposing themselves on their lower lying neighbors?
posted
Early human evolution paralleled early human expansion, northward. As humans evolved, migration northward expanded. Thus, it can be said, northerly humans are higher evolved humans to those in lower lying lattitudes.
quote:Early human evolution paralleled early human expansion, northward. As humans evolved, migration northward expanded. Thus, it can be said, northerly humans are higher evolved humans to those in lower lying lattitudes.
1) Then logically doesn't this imply that "lower lying" humans are the ones who are more "evolved", or at least equally evolved, since they're the agents of expansion?
2) Hasn't it been established that tropically adapted black Africans were the agents of this expansion to the north in homo sapiens?
3) If migration is the touchstone of evolution then what about westward migration?
Posts: 1038 | From: Franklin Park, NJ | Registered: Aug 2005
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Gigantic: Why is it nearly all southerly people have been conquered by people of the north? What is it with northerners that make them capable of imposing themselves on their lower lying neighbors?
Stroking your little thing and musing huh?
Ignorance is truly bliss, but here is reality.
Q: Who conquered the advanced Black cultures of Europe? A: Illiterate White nomads from central Asia (Latins and Hellenes).
Q: Who conquered the advanced western Roman culture. A: Illiterate White nomads from central Asia (Goths).
Q: Who conquered the advanced Persian culture. A: Illiterate Black nomads from Arabia.
Q: Who conquered the advanced eastern Roman culture. A: Illiterate White nomads from central Asia (Turks).
Do you see a pattern?
Ya, people who have something, are always conquered by people with nothing.
Posts: 22721 | Registered: Oct 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
^ True. The People of The Sea are an excellent example. Described as having no tradition of the own, no language, and no ritual. No wonder they assimilated into Egyptian culture so readily in all things EXCEPT Pharaoh making. The absence of this last detail is what kept them from being truly Egyptian and finally led to their expulsion.
Posts: 2403 | Registered: Feb 2010
| IP: Logged |
posted
We're all fish, better teach your folk Give them money to eat, then next week they're broke So when you sleep, they're reachin for your throat.
Posts: 525 | From: Terra | Registered: Oct 2008
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Apocalypse: 1) Then logically doesn't this imply that "lower lying" humans are the ones who are more "evolved", or at least equally evolved, since they're the agents of expansion?
OOA Homosapiens are more evolved than their immediate ancestors, Homosapiens in Africa.
quote: 2) Hasn't it been established that tropically adapted black Africans were the agents of this expansion to the north in homo sapiens?
Yea and homo erectus is the agent of homosapien, and simian is the forrunner to homoerectus. I fail to see your reasoning.
Posts: 2025 | Registered: Dec 2009
| IP: Logged |
quote:OOA Homosapiens are more evolved than their immediate ancestors, Homosapiens in Africa.
This is your opinion and as such is worthless.
quote:Yea and homo erectus is the agent of homosapien, and simian is the forrunner to homoerectus. I fail to see your reasoning.
Therefore neanderthal was more evolved than homo sapiens who was "lower lying?"
Was migration a consequent of higher reasoning or higher reasoning a result of migration?
Posts: 1038 | From: Franklin Park, NJ | Registered: Aug 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
I don't understand. When did there evolve another species of human after Homo sapiens? Who are they and what follows Homo in their genus name?
Posts: 8014 | From: the Tekrur in the Western Sahel | Registered: Feb 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
^Then why did you made this thread? And what was your outline for the north south divide?
Posts: 6546 | From: japan | Registered: Feb 2009
| IP: Logged |
posted
Gigantic Early human evolution paralleled early human expansion, northward. As humans evolved, migration northward expanded. Thus, it can be said, northerly humans are higher evolved humans to those in lower lying lattitudes.
Then what did you mean by this?
Posts: 6546 | From: japan | Registered: Feb 2009
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Gigantic: Why is it nearly all southerly people have been conquered by people of the north? What is it with northerners that make them capable of imposing themselves on their lower lying neighbors?
Man you lost in the first post. Good going idiot!!@!!@#!@!
Simple - Italy is South of Germania.
Aztecs are South of Chereokee.
On and on.
Posts: 4028 | From: NW USA | Registered: May 2005
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Brada-Anansi: Gigantic Early human evolution paralleled early human expansion, northward. As humans evolved, migration northward expanded. Thus, it can be said, northerly humans are higher evolved humans to those in lower lying lattitudes.
Then what did you mean by this?
hehehe
the gigantic dummy doesn't get it.
Posts: 4254 | From: dasein | Registered: Jun 2009
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Gigantic: Why is it nearly all southerly people have been conquered by people of the north? What is it with northerners that make them capable of imposing themselves on their lower lying neighbors?
Stroking your little thing and musing huh?
Ignorance is truly bliss, but here is reality.
Q: Who conquered the advanced Black cultures of Europe? A: Illiterate White nomads from central Asia (Latins and Hellenes).
Q: Who conquered the advanced western Roman culture. A: Illiterate White nomads from central Asia (Goths).
Q: Who conquered the advanced Persian culture. A: Illiterate Black nomads from Arabia.
Q: Who conquered the advanced eastern Roman culture. A: Illiterate White nomads from central Asia (Turks).
Do you see a pattern?
Ya, people who have something, are always conquered by people with nothing.
He asked why they were able to conquer not who they were.
Posts: 42940 | From: , | Registered: Jan 2010
| IP: Logged |
posted
This is why you should always stay out of grown folk business. This is what I said, fool:
northerly humans are higher evolved humans to those in lower lying lattitudes
Do I speak of a new species, Turd?
quote:Originally posted by anguishofbeing:
quote:Originally posted by Brada-Anansi: Gigantic Early human evolution paralleled early human expansion, northward. As humans evolved, migration northward expanded. Thus, it can be said, northerly humans are higher evolved humans to those in lower lying lattitudes.
The White European is actually a Dravidian Albino. since Albinos are not part of the "Natural" order, it could be said that they are a "New" species.
Posts: 22721 | Registered: Oct 2005
| IP: Logged |
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
Printer-friendly view of this topic