quote:Originally posted by the lioness: if a negro is not a true negro what type of negro are they?
An ethnic background.
I don't understand your post. Maybe you can explain yourself?
Posts: 22235 | From: האם אינכם כילדי הכרית אלי בני ישראל | Registered: Nov 2010
| IP: Logged |
Btw, your link is evidence that there was black presence in Europe's Anglo-Saxon, period 8 A.D. How some looked them is not relevant. So this means Mike and others are right after all.
This insertion reminds me of the Moors describtions.
Also in a certain desert fiery mountains are read about, in which people are born black in their whole body like Ethiopians, of whom we saw a certain one as black as coal, but with shining teeth and eyes and nails.
This here speaks historically for itself. Remember?
There are Ethiopians who are black in their whole body, whom the flaming sun continually burns with excessive heat,
lol
Also a race of people with huge bodies is born in the east of the river Brixontis black in body
Yorkshireman found to share DNA with African tribes
Scientists from Leicester University made the finding during research sponsored by The Wellcome Trust.
They were examining the relationship between the male, or Y, chromosome and surnames.
Like surnames, the Y-chromosome is passed from father to son, virtually unchanged through generations.
Professor Mark Jobling said: "We found John was in the A1 group of Y-chromosomes, which is very rare and highly west African-specific.
The University's Director of Archaeological Museums, Lindsay Allason-Jones, who has organized an exhibition of the Museum's Romano-African artefacts to coincide with Black History Month, says: 'From the evidence we have here, it is clear that colour was no bar to the status an individual could achieve in the Roman Empire'...
“Africans have been present in Europe from classical times. In the 2nd and 3rd centuries Roman soldiers of African origin served in Britain, and some stayed after their military service ended. According to the historians Fryer, Edwards and Walvin, in the 9th century Viking fleets raided North Africa and Spain, captured Black people, and took them to Britain and Ireland.
From the end of the 15th century we begin to see more evidence for the presence of Black Moors in the accounts of the reign of King James IV of Scotland, and later in Elizabethan England.”
* Source "ANOTHER AFROCENTRIC" lol: The National Archives of Scotland.
"The King Provides Clothes for the Party A variety of fabrics were used to make clothing for the Moors - velvet ('wellus'), woollen kersey ('carsay') and fine Holland linen - which was decorated or fastened with buttons, rings or other ornaments ('mailyeis'). These were paid for by the treasury of King James IV. It seems that these Moors were not servants; it is more likely that they were invited guests staying at the palace. Accounts of the Lord High Treasurer of Scotland, vol. 3, p. 101 (1505)"
"The King Requests an Audience with a Black Baby This extract from the Lord High Treasurer's accounts show that in 1505/6 a payment of 28 shillings was made to 'the nuris that brocht the Moris barne to see, be the Kingis command'. The king must have known of this child to ask to see it." "The child may have been that of the 'More taubronar', the Black drummer at court. Treasury accounts also itemise accommodation for the 'wife of the taubronar and his barne'. This would suggest that the drummer was living at the palace with his family. Accounts of the Lord High Treasurer of Scotland, vol. 3, p. 182 (1505/6)"
This image, an extract from the 60ft-long Westminster Tournament Roll, shows six trumpeters, one of whom is Black and is almost certainly John Blanke. All the trumpeters are wearing yellow and grey, with blue purses at their waists. John Blanke is the only one wearing a brown turban latticed with yellow. He is mounted on a grey horse with a black harness.
The image of who they speak...so let us make no mistake about it. lol
Westminster Tournament Roll (1511) By permission of The College of Arms, London
So who were the Numerus Maurorum Aurelianorum and why are they so important to the Black British community? Our key evidence for this unit is a 4th century inscription, found in 1934 at the village of Beaumont two miles east of Burgh-by-Sands on the banks of the River Eden, and known as the Beaumont inscription. Translated from the Latin it reads:
To Jupiter Best and Greatest and the Majesty of our two Emperors, to the Genius [guardian spirit] of the numerus of Aurelian Moors, Valerianus’ and Gallienus’ own, Caelius Vibianus, cohort-tribune in charge of the above-mentioned numerus, [set up this altar] through the agency of Julius Rufinus, senior centurion.
posted
^ LOL No wonder these trolls are so obsessed with trying to make Africans caca-soid mixed. They are just angered by the fact that black Africans have had a significant presence in Europe throughout historical times. So they psychologically project their ill feelings of having black ancestry among them into trying to make Africans have white ancestry.
quote:Originally posted by Troll Patrol: Nigerians have about 371 tribes, hence ethnic backgrounds. So I don't understand your post? lol
Actually there in lies the problem. The groups called "tribes" in Africa are not tribes at all but actual ethnic groups. This is like calling ethnic groups in Europe such as Albanians and Hungarians "tribes" even though these two really are subdivided into different tribes. It is a vestige of European colonial racism to identify the native ethnicities of other regions in the world as "tribes" in an attempt to make seem primitive. In the mean time, Euros ignore that tribal divisions still exist in their homeland.
quote:Originally posted by Omo Baba: Spot the ugly one out:
LMAO
What's funny is that Hillary goes around the world meeting other female leaders to tout her Western feminist notions of "glass ceilings" and "girl power" when many of those regions she visits have long held traditions of female leadership and power since times immemorial, certainly thousands of years before her feminist crap was spawned.
Posts: 26267 | From: Atlanta, Georgia, USA | Registered: Feb 2005
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Djehuti: [QB] ^ LOL No wonder these trolls are so obsessed with trying to make Africans caca-soid mixed. They are just angered by the fact that black Africans have had a significant presence in Europe throughout historical times.
when you say "significant presence" are you referring to population numbers of Africans in Europe? If so what are some of your population estimates of Africans in Medieval Europe, places such as France, England and Germany etc.?
Posts: 42935 | From: , | Registered: Jan 2010
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Spiralman: Good question.
Bad answer from someone who espouses and advocates the term "true negro".
Just face the FACT that the whole racial category of "negro" is a farce as is all other racial categories and that even the "negro" became limited to a narrow definition in order to limit the diversity of black Africans and claim some Africans as black-skinned caucasians or "Hamites" which not only the Egyptians were grouped as but Ethiopians, Tutsi, Fula, etc.
Its not. If it was such a farce then we wouldn't be able to group and distinguish people as races. Truth is black people hate the concept of true Negro because they hate their real features and desire Caucasian features. Why do you think blacks go through great lengths to prove that they can sport Caucasian features by showing black Africans with Caucasian features i.e Ethiopians?
So what do you call it when whites try to claim black tribes. Jealously?
It's interesting. You don't see asians trying to claim africans. What is up with the low self-esteem white people?
Posts: 116 | From: Birmingham, AL | Registered: Oct 2011
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Spiralman: Good question.
Bad answer from someone who espouses and advocates the term "true negro".
Just face the FACT that the whole racial category of "negro" is a farce as is all other racial categories and that even the "negro" became limited to a narrow definition in order to limit the diversity of black Africans and claim some Africans as black-skinned caucasians or "Hamites" which not only the Egyptians were grouped as but Ethiopians, Tutsi, Fula, etc.
Its not. If it was such a farce then we wouldn't be able to group and distinguish people as races. Truth is black people hate the concept of true Negro because they hate their real features and desire Caucasian features. Why do you think blacks go through great lengths to prove that they can sport Caucasian features by showing black Africans with Caucasian features i.e Ethiopians?
^There go your nappy-headed, beastly, monsterous features and low self-esteem nygger azz showing jealousy of Ethiopians. What's the problem. An Ethiopian woman can pull any black man and you can't. An Ethiopian isn't here to defend himself so why even bring their group in your feud. You are sooooo jealous of beautiful people. No one interested in your "true negro" bandwagon.
Posts: 2088 | Registered: Feb 2007
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Spiralman: Good question.
Bad answer from someone who espouses and advocates the term "true negro".
Just face the FACT that the whole racial category of "negro" is a farce as is all other racial categories and that even the "negro" became limited to a narrow definition in order to limit the diversity of black Africans and claim some Africans as black-skinned caucasians or "Hamites" which not only the Egyptians were grouped as but Ethiopians, Tutsi, Fula, etc.
Its not. If it was such a farce then we wouldn't be able to group and distinguish people as races. Truth is black people hate the concept of true Negro because they hate their real features and desire Caucasian features. Why do you think blacks go through great lengths to prove that they can sport Caucasian features by showing black Africans with Caucasian features i.e Ethiopians?
So what do you call it when whites try to claim black tribes. Jealously?
It's interesting. You don't see asians trying to claim africans. What is up with the low self-esteem white people?
^That is a black woman who is upset that she isn't bless with goodly features. She is highly jealous of Ethiopians (women) because they are blessed with beauty and she can't compete. She thinks if all black people look like her gorilla looking azz, she would have a chance of being beautiful too. She think all the beautiful black women with "caucasoid" features are taking attention away from her "true negro" self. If she could remove all these beautiful black people with "caucasoid" features out of the black category then maybe...just maybe she will get attention and able to compete and land a man.
Posts: 2088 | Registered: Feb 2007
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Spiralman: Good question.
Bad answer from someone who espouses and advocates the term "true negro".
Just face the FACT that the whole racial category of "negro" is a farce as is all other racial categories and that even the "negro" became limited to a narrow definition in order to limit the diversity of black Africans and claim some Africans as black-skinned caucasians or "Hamites" which not only the Egyptians were grouped as but Ethiopians, Tutsi, Fula, etc.
Its not. If it was such a farce then we wouldn't be able to group and distinguish people as races. Truth is black people hate the concept of true Negro because they hate their real features and desire Caucasian features. Why do you think blacks go through great lengths to prove that they can sport Caucasian features by showing black Africans with Caucasian features i.e Ethiopians?
So what do you call it when whites try to claim black tribes. Jealously?
It's interesting. You don't see asians trying to claim africans. What is up with the low self-esteem white people?
^That is a black woman who is upset that she isn't bless with goodly features. She is highly jealous of Ethiopians (women) because they are blessed with beauty and she can't compete. She thinks if all black people look like her gorilla looking azz, she would have a chance of being beautiful too. She think all the beautiful black women with "caucasoid" features are taking attention away from her "true negro" self. If she could remove all these beautiful black people with "caucasoid" features out of the black category then maybe...just maybe she will get attention and able to compete and land a man.
LOOOOL. Keep it up hun.
Posts: 116 | From: Birmingham, AL | Registered: Oct 2011
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Spiralbrains: Its not. If it was such a farce then we wouldn't be able to group and distinguish people as races...
Not scientifically, as science proves genetic races do not exist. They are purely subjective categories.
quote:Truth is black people hate the concept of true Negro because they hate their real features and desire Caucasian features. Why do you think blacks go through great lengths to prove that they can sport Caucasian features by showing black Africans with Caucasian features i.e Ethiopians?
Perhaps it hasn't occurred to you that by showing so-called "caucasian" exist in black Africans means that "caucasian" does not exist either, idiot! It's funny you should mention this because whenever "negroid" features are shown not only among Egyptians but in neolithic remains of southern Europe (who we now know to be Africans) why is it white scholars are quick to simply state these to be variants of the caucasian race?? Why were Ethiopians and Somalis grouped as "caucasians"?! Was it because whites somehow hated their white skin and secretly wanted to be black thus concocting the 'Hamitic' i.e. black-caucasian race?? Perhaps that is why whites like you go to great lengths to state that Egyptians and other northeast Africans were caucasian because you favor black skin. Maybe that is why you spend billions of dollars a year on tanning.
^That's a black woman. She possess the features that she considers "true negro" in an extreme form and doesn't like herself because of it. She projects this ugly feeling onto other blacks and claim they hate themselves because they claim "caucasian" features are native to blacks. In other words, if blacks have "caucasian" features then why don't I? It hasn't dawn on her that she is just a variant (or extreme variant) of many of the black groups that is disperse throughout Africa and the world. She is jealous and intimidated by any black women who doesn't have 'broad' features because they will take attention away from her and get all the guys.
Posts: 2088 | Registered: Feb 2007
| IP: Logged |
^I can't be the only one that notices her obsession of Ethiopians. She mention Ethiopians in every discussion that is not even about them. She is soooo jealous.
Posts: 2088 | Registered: Feb 2007
| IP: Logged |
^I can't be the only one that notices her obsession of Ethiopians. She mention Ethiopians in every discussion that is not even about them. She is soooo jealous. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Do you realize all of your comments recently were about them? LOL, confused mixed girl or white guy with no life, have you been bullied by black people? Is that why your such a hater? There something seriously wrong with you and how you constantly flip-flop.
Posts: 116 | From: Birmingham, AL | Registered: Oct 2011
| IP: Logged |
posted
No I haven't realize that. Was it a comment to a post that may have been in relations to Ethiopians or I complaining about their good looks.
quote:Originally posted by HabariTess:
quote:Originally posted by Bettyboo:
quote:Originally posted by HabariTess:
LOOOOL. Keep it up hun.
^I can't be the only one that notices her obsession of Ethiopians. She mention Ethiopians in every discussion that is not even about them. She is soooo jealous.
Do you realize all of your comments recently were about them? LOL, confused mixed girl or white guy with no life, have you been bullied by black people? Is that why your such a hater? There something seriously wrong with you and how you constantly flip-flop. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Posts: 2088 | Registered: Feb 2007
| IP: Logged |
^I can't be the only one that notices her obsession of Ethiopians. She mention Ethiopians in every discussion that is not even about them. She is soooo jealous.
Do you realize all of your comments recently were about them? LOL, confused mixed girl or white guy with no life, have you been bullied by black people? Is that why your such a hater? There something seriously wrong with you and how you constantly flip-flop. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Are all the same person, its probably some poor whiteboy who has no friends and is still getting breast feed by his mom
Posts: 1064 | Registered: Jan 2011
| IP: Logged |
^I can't be the only one that notices her obsession of Ethiopians. She mention Ethiopians in every discussion that is not even about them. She is soooo jealous.
Do you realize all of your comments recently were about them? LOL, confused mixed girl or white guy with no life, have you been bullied by black people? Is that why your such a hater? There something seriously wrong with you and how you constantly flip-flop.
Are all the same person, its probably some poor whiteboy who has no friends and is still getting breast feed by his mom
Confirming truth & blaccentric bull are the same user. Bettyboo however isn't.
Confirming truth is a black male. Bettyboo is a mixed race girl with an identity crisis:
quote:Originally posted by Bettyboo: My grandmother was a Ukrainian jew
Bettyboo has admitted to being 1/4 white. Its why she doesn't have the full negroid phenotype.
Posts: 2408 | From: My mother's basement | Registered: Dec 2010
| IP: Logged |
posted
The reason why cassibitch has been banned from so many forums.
No, you (and others) were banned because you broke the forum rules. The Moderator fully explains himself when they resort to banning, in your case you were banned for: 1. Complaining about board moderation. 2. Trolling 3. Clear cases of misrepresentation 4. Wasting time
You clearly never read the forum rules.
I offered an open debate to our origins, and linked to where it can be done. Contrary to the lies you are posting here about the forum, Evolutionfairytale accepts all worldviews. There are Atheists, Agnostics, Buddhists etc on the forum, those that are polite and can debate properly don't find themselves banned. It was clear though from the start you don't want a clean honest debate; all you resort to is lying and abusing others and that of course is so easy to do behind the safety of your keyboard.
We don't have time for troublemakers and trolls... at Evolutionfairytale forums.
How sad even your own white brothers hate you lol
Posts: 1064 | Registered: Jan 2011
| IP: Logged |
That is my post, not what someone directed at me. I typed that up over a year ago. I used to hold influence on that forum, and i ended up banning lots of people. It was usually people logging on the leave vile abuse at others, so they got banned.
quote:No, you (and others) were banned because you broke the forum rules. The Moderator fully explains himself when they resort to banning, in your case you were banned for: 1. Complaining about board moderation. 2. Trolling 3. Clear cases of misrepresentation 4. Wasting time
You clearly never read the forum rules.
I offered an open debate to our origins, and linked to where it can be done. Contrary to the lies you are posting here about the forum, Evolutionfairytale accepts all worldviews. There are Atheists, Agnostics, Buddhists etc on the forum, those that are polite and can debate properly don't find themselves banned. It was clear though from the start you don't want a clean honest debate; all you resort to is lying and abusing others and that of course is so easy to do behind the safety of your keyboard.
Posts: 2408 | From: My mother's basement | Registered: Dec 2010
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by cassiterides: ^ Further proof sub-saharan IQ is only 67.*
*Anything under 70 falls under the ''mentally retarded'' range.
From the many posts here by you, we can conclude you score way below 70, not only in I.Q. but also in E.Q.
This is why you are being debunked all the time.
You always have failed to explain why so many Nigerians are academics and score higher than the average American and Britsh immigrant.
Posts: 22235 | From: האם אינכם כילדי הכרית אלי בני ישראל | Registered: Nov 2010
| IP: Logged |
That is my post, not what someone directed at me. I typed that up over a year ago. I used to hold influence on that forum, and i ended up banning lots of people. It was usually people logging on the leave vile abuse at others, so they got banned.
quote:No, you (and others) were banned because you broke the forum rules. The Moderator fully explains himself when they resort to banning, in your case you were banned for: 1. Complaining about board moderation. 2. Trolling 3. Clear cases of misrepresentation 4. Wasting time
You clearly never read the forum rules.
I offered an open debate to our origins, and linked to where it can be done. Contrary to the lies you are posting here about the forum, Evolutionfairytale accepts all worldviews. There are Atheists, Agnostics, Buddhists etc on the forum, those that are polite and can debate properly don't find themselves banned. It was clear though from the start you don't want a clean honest debate; all you resort to is lying and abusing others and that of course is so easy to do behind the safety of your keyboard.
By that sort of reasoning, you should get band here. Simple and logic.
Posts: 22235 | From: האם אינכם כילדי הכרית אלי בני ישראל | Registered: Nov 2010
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by asante: The reason why cassibitch has been banned from so many forums.
No, you (and others) were banned because you broke the forum rules. The Moderator fully explains himself when they resort to banning, in your case you were banned for: 1. Complaining about board moderation. 2. Trolling 3. Clear cases of misrepresentation 4. Wasting time
You clearly never read the forum rules.
I offered an open debate to our origins, and linked to where it can be done. Contrary to the lies you are posting here about the forum, Evolutionfairytale accepts all worldviews. There are Atheists, Agnostics, Buddhists etc on the forum, those that are polite and can debate properly don't find themselves banned. It was clear though from the start you don't want a clean honest debate; all you resort to is lying and abusing others and that of course is so easy to do behind the safety of your keyboard.
We don't have time for troublemakers and trolls... at Evolutionfairytale forums.
How sad even your own white brothers hate you lol
Funny, he didn't comment on the last sentences. Even they are repulsed by his derogatory claims. So they bursted out in outrage.
Posts: 22235 | From: האם אינכם כילדי הכרית אלי בני ישראל | Registered: Nov 2010
| IP: Logged |
Tukuler
multidisciplinary Black Scholar
Member # 19944
posted
quote:Originally posted by alTakruri:
quote:Originally posted by the lioness: if a negro is not a true negro what type of negro are they?
These are some of the negroes imagined by old school anthropology after the word negro was invented to mean a black thing or commodity, an item for sale in consequence of the transAtlantic slave trade. English already has a word black so negro does not simply mean black in the English tongue.
To understand the vileness of the word and why no self-respecting Anglophone black would apply it to themselves and why Luso-Hispanophones either have other words for a black person or even literally outlawed the term to refer to a human being see Richard B. Moore The Name "Negro": its origin and evil use New York: Argentina Press, 1960
For the various anthropology fantasy negroes Harry Hamilton Johnston The Negro in the New world London: Methuen & Co., 1910 pp. 1-32 (link) Charles Gabriel Seligman Races of Africa London: Thornton Butterworth Ltd., 1939
One type of negro I neglected to list is the Silly Negro Reference: see certain posters on this forum.
Posts: 8179 | From: the Tekrur straddling Senegal & Mauritania | Registered: Dec 2011
| IP: Logged |
posted
^You seem to be a good candidate from what I've noticed. Ironically setting up the example by reviving a 7 year old thread.
Posts: 310 | From: US | Registered: Jun 2015
| IP: Logged |