quote: Body proportions in Late Pleistocene Europe and modern human origins. T W Holliday
Body proportions covary with climate, apparently as the result of climatic selection. Ontogenic research and migrant studies have demonstrated that body proportions are largely genetically controlled and are under low selective rates; thus studies of body form can provide evidence for evolutionarily short-term dispersals and/or gene flow. Following these observations, competing models of modern human origins yield different predictions concerning body proportion shifts in Late Pleistocene Europe. Replacement predicts that the earliest modern Europeans will possess "tropical" body proportions (assuming Africa is the center of origin), while Regional Continuity permits only minor shifts in body shape, due to climatic change and/or improved cultural buffering. This study tests these predictions via analyses of osteometric data reflective of trunk height and breadth, limb proportions and relative body mass for samples of Early Upper Paleolithic (EUP), Late Upper Paleolithic (LUP) and Mesolithic (MES) humans and 13 recent African and European populations. Results reveal a clear tendency for the EUP sample to cluster with recent Africans, while LUP and MES samples cluster with recent Europeans. These results refute the hypothesis of local continuity in Europe, and are consistent with an interpretation of elevated gene flow (and population dispersal?) from Africa, followed by subsequent climatic adaptation to colder conditions. These data do not, however, preclude the possibility of some (albeit small) contribution of genes from Neandertals to succeeding populations, as is postulated in Bräuer's "Afro-European Sapiens" model.
quote:Brachial and crural indices of European late Upper Paleolithic and Mesolithic humans.
T W Holliday
Among recent humans brachial and crural indices are positively correlated with mean annual temperature, such that high indices are found in tropical groups. However, despite inhabiting glacial Europe, the Upper Paleolithic Europeans possessed high indices, prompting Trinkaus (1981) to argue for gene flow from warmer regions associated with modern human emergence in Europe. In contrast, Frayer et al.(1993) point out that Late Upper Paleolithic and Mesolithic Europeans should not exhibit tropically-adapted limb proportions, since, even assuming replacement, their ancestors had experienced cold stress in glacial Europe for at least 12 millennia. This study investigates three questions tied to the brachial and crural indices among Late Pleistocene and recent humans. First, which limb segments (either proximal or distal) are primarily responsible for variation in brachial and crural indices? Second, are these indices reflective of overall limb elongation? And finally, do the Late Upper Paleolithic and Mesolithic Europeans retain relatively and/or absolutely long limbs? Results indicate that in the lower limb, the distal limb segment contributes most of the variability to intralimb proportions, while in the upper limb the proximal and distal limb segments appear to be equally variable. Additionally, brachial and crural indices do not appear to be a good measure of overall limb length, and thus, while the Late Upper Paleolithic and Mesolithic humans have significantly higher (i.e., tropically-adapted) brachial and crural indices than do recent Europeans, they also have shorter (i.e., cold-adapted) limbs. The somewhat paradoxical retention of "tropical" indices in the context of more "cold-adapted" limb length is best explained as evidence for Replacement in the European Late Pleistocene, followed by gradual cold adaptation in glacial Europe.
You are a recent adaption to Humanity..Sand Nigger..
quote:Originally posted by Perahu: They are the ancestors of Caucasoids.
Posts: 8804 | From: The fear of his majesty had entered their hearts, they were powerless | Registered: Nov 2007
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by cassiterides: The indigenous Arabians i believe are Veddoid, just like India, but they only survive pure-blooded in very small pockets. I believe the darker Arab racial types have a higher degree of Veddid admixture, i don't believe they are pure-blooded Caucasoids who just aquired a darker skin tone through climatic adaptation.
They are proto-Caucasoid or dark Caucasoids and racially non-Negroid. For example the most prominent native maternal marker in the Arabian plateau R0 is the ancestor of the most common European maternal marker H. They are the ancestors of Caucasoids.
Yep, Veddoids are not Negroids but Australoid, but you think this is what caucasoid sprung from? My view on caucasoid origins is the polycentric Coonian evolution: H. Erectus > ? > Heidelberg Man > Neanderthal > Cro-Magnon > Caucasoid.
Posts: 2408 | From: My mother's basement | Registered: Dec 2010
| IP: Logged |
"Pure white evolution led to Neanderthals both in terms of paler skin and cold-adaptive limb proportions. African evolution led to anatomically modern humans.
QUOTE: "What was different about the Neanderthals? What did the Cro- Magnons think when they saw them for the first time? To begin with, the Neanderthals were very light-skinned and the Cro- Magnons were less so. "
--Juan Luis Arsuaga, Andy Klatt. 2004. The Neanderthal's Necklace: In Search of the First Thinkers
"This finding suggests that Neanderthals evolved a functional variant of the MC1R gene independently from modern humans as they dispersed into northerly latitudes, and thus supports the inference for the convergent evolution of depigmented skin in the Neanderthals lineage.." --Michael P. Muehlenbein. 2010. Human Evolutionary Biology
"Regarding environmental buffering, Trinkaus (1986 and this volume) reiterates that while Neanderthal limb proportions are suggestive of cold adaptation, no such indications are shown by Eurasian early modern humans. Their distinct limb proportions are instead indicative of an equatorial ancestry and better culturally based thermal protection.. the limb proportions of the Eurasian early modern samples are retentions of the African ancestral morphology of long limbs with long distal segments.." -- Erik Trinkaus (ed), 'The Emergence of Modern Humans", (C. Stringer p. 88). School of American Research, Santa Fe, New Mexico, 1989.
Some white "Racial Reality" or "biodiversity" proponents argue for European descent from NEanderthals "untainted" by Africa- a lily white "pure" line of white evolution.
Fine. Lets go with their approach for a moment. ----------------------------------------------------
Using it, we see then that the first whites were cold-adapted Neanderthals that failed to progress beyond the Stone Age despite a sometimes favorable environment with rich resources available (Lewin 1994). Ice Age Europe was not a cold hell but had variable climate and rich forest, woodland and aquatic resources, including ancient variants of wheat-like spelt and chick peas in place that could have been domesticated, along with ancestors of sheep, cattle and pigs. Despite tens of thousands of years with these advantages and resources however, white lineages failed to move beyond the Stone Age.
Thus, using the "biodiversity" approach, the first great "racial" split in the humanoid line involved white Neanderthals who colonized Europe, and Africans, who colonized Africa and went on to become anatomically modern humans.
The first “pure” white genetic output was thus brutish, primitive, dead end Neanderthals. By contrast, it was Africa that produced the future of humanity- anatomically modern humans, not cold-climate Europe. White NEanderthals survived, until they were supplanted by more advanced, modern tropically adapted humans from Africa that mingled with and replaced them. This would be the first instance of the hybridization that produced today's white Europeans. It was the coming of tropically adapted African variants into Europe that caused Europe to progress beyond the brutish “pure” white Neanderthal lineages. Continuing migrations from Africa and a mixture of African and Asian OOA migrants- all anatomically modern humans- caused a second round of mixed breeding in EUrope, and was to eventually replace the pure white Neanderthal lineages to yield today's European hybrid population. QUOTE:
^^"Middle Pleistocene Diversity in Africa and the Origin of Modern Humans Günter Bräuer1 -- There is wide agreement on a speciation event in Africa at around 0.8 or 0.9 mya when Homo erectus (or Homo ergaster) gave rise to a species named Homo heidelbergensis, or Homo rhodesiensis, or Homo sapiens. The new species expanded into Europe leading to the Neanderthal lineage, whereas in Africa it evolved into anatomically modern humans. The lineage of anatomical modernization can be subdivided into three groups, morphs, or grades: an early one including Bodo, Saldanha, Kabwe, Salé, a subsequent one including Florisbad, Laetoli H 18, Ileret (ER 3884), Jebel Irhoud, and early anatomically moderns with Omo Kibish, Herto and others." --Günter Bräuer, "Middle Pleistocene Diversity in Africa and the Origin of Modern Humans". IN: Modern Origins: A North African Perspective. 2012. Series: Vertebrate Paleobiology and Paleoanthropology Hublin, Jean-Jacques; McPherron, Shannon P. (Eds.)
And
” Holliday (2000) examined postcranial morphology of the varied Levantine hominids from Qafzeh and Skhul(anatomically modern) and from Amud, Kebara and Tabun (Neanderthal). He determined that they were morphologically distinct; the anatomically moderns had tropically adapted body proportions, suggesting African origins, while the Neanderthals had cold adapted body proportions, suggesting European origins.” --Holliday 2000
This then could be another source of the Eurocentric inferiority complex. Pure white genetics produced only the savage Neanderthals. Africa by contrast, produced a better, more advanced human than white lineages. Today's whites still show some traces of Neanderthal genes, a throwback to their savage evolution. Some white writers argue that this Neanderthal remnant, could account for the white penchant for violence and murder. R. Bradley, advances this this theory in "The Iceman Inheritance."
So under this biodiversity approach, why then didn't pure white Europeans stay as NEanderthals? According to Bradley, they were replaced with the more advanced Africans and Asians. This diluted the savage white NEanderthal lineages, producing a better level of humanity. However the violent, savage nature of whites still remains, due to remnants of Neanderthal genes. Recent scientific findings showing European whites have traces of Neanderthal genes have been used by some claimants to support the Iceman theory. Some disagree with Bradley. Others argue that his theory of white ice age adaptation is true. Racial "biodiversity" proponents share general agreement along a spectrum with its central holding of pure white evolutionary lineages, "untainted" by "negro blood."
White European lineages [Neanderthals] were the first humans to engage in cannibalism
"Cannibalism is a good example. Several Mousterian sites, along which Moula-Guercy (France) stands out, have provided reasonably firm evidence of anthropic action on Neanderthal bones.. Defleur and colleagues (1999) compared the patters of ungulate and Neanderthal bones, the skeletal parts that were found and the tool marks on the bone fragments. They concluded that all the fragments with marks indicate prey that had been subject to butchery. This suggests that cannibalistic oractices existed among the Neanderthals.. But the question of cannibalism can be understood in another way. When Wolpoff was asked about the meaning of the evidence found at Moula-Guercy, he replied with a question: why should modern humans be the only violent ones? Arsuaga went even further in believing that Neanderthal cannibalistic behavior actually constituted a very human behavior, which revealed a human mind (Both cited by Culotta, 1999). " --Camilo J. Cela-Conde, Francisco José Ayala, 2007. Human evolution: trails from the past.
"But recent excavation by Alban Delfeur and Tim White at the 100,000 year old French cave of Moula-Guercy has demonstrated cannibalism beyond any reasonable doubt. The site contains butchered animal remains, predominantly red deer. Among the bones are the skulls of two young Neanderthals, their masseter muscles filleted and the tongue removed from at least one of them; the cut marks on the inner face of the mandible are virtually identical with those mode on the inside of the 12,5000-year-old modern human mandible from Gough's (New) Cave, [England] described in Chapter 3 (see p. 80). Crania of both deer and Neanderthals were broken open to get at the marrow.." --Timothy Taylor. 2005. The Buried Soul: How Humans Invented Death
-------------------- Note: I am not an "Egyptologist" as claimed by some still bitter, defeated, trolls creating fake profiles and posts elsewhere. Hapless losers, you still fail. My output of hard data debunking racist nonsense has actually INCREASED since you began.. Posts: 5905 | From: The Hammer | Registered: Aug 2008
| IP: Logged |
posted
^ Cro-Magnon were proto-Caucasoid. Their skulls were orthognathic, they had straight-wavy hair, and thin noses.
Cro-Magnon crania analysis clusters them closest to modern White Europeans, than any other race.
''If Upper Paleolithic people were "European" from about 35,000 B.P., then such population distinctions are at least that old. And the Cro-Magnons were already racially European, i.e., Caucasoid. This has always been accepted because of the general appearance of the skulls: straight faces, narrow noses, and so forth. It is also possible to test this arithmetically. [...] Except for Predmosti 4, which is distant from every present and past population, all of these skulls show themselves to be closer to "Europeans" than to other peoples — Mladec and Abri Pataud comfortably so, the other two much more remotely.'' - Howells (1997)
Your claim that cro-magnons were non-white is laughable.
Cro-magnon crania is closest to modern white people, not negroes. Negroids don't descend from cro-magnon.
Posts: 2408 | From: My mother's basement | Registered: Dec 2010
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Perahu: Ethiopia --> The dominant language and script is from Asia, virtually all of their technology was borrowed from Asians, their religion is West Eurasian derived, genes of the ruling Amhara-Tigray class is more than 50% Asian.
Nubia --> Copied a lot from Egypt, which in turn was heavily Middle Eastern influenced. Modern Nubians have over 50% haplogroup J and are mostly Middle Eastern by genes.
Swahili States --> The Swahili language is over 50% Arabic, it's barely a Bantu language. The ruling Swahili class is heavily Arab mixed. Ask any ethnic Swahili if he has Arab blood and he will confirm this for you.
J is not that widespread in sudan,it's mostly in north africa WERE you see the darker green in the map below and the areas where it shows a lighter green means most folks do not have J.
Areas that do not show the green means even less folks have it or no one has it.Only VERY FEW FOLKS in those areas will HAVE J or no one has J,meaning it's even less widepread then the areas that have the lighter green in the map below.
SO WRONG AGAIN.
I will not go into MORE details here because it's a waste of time,but everything you said above was dead wrong,outdated and just out right lies,and you know it because of my past correct info and others who posted the correct info on this forum that you guys love to ignore.
Posts: 2688 | Registered: Jul 2004
| IP: Logged |
Human progress, evolution & advancement is integrated ,adapted , coincidental & accidental... so what's your excuse? ....
It's 2012 & your still incapable of original thought , plagiarizing articles & recycling topics...
. . . . .
Richard D. Fuerle - Erectus walks amongst us... chapter 15 civilisations & achievements....
QUOTE]UNoriginally posted by cassiterides:
Blacks had a chance to prove European colonisation was wrong.
But you failed.
Europeans colonised sub-saharan african countries giving them technology and great infrastructure but after european rule collapsed these countries have declined.
Blacks can not run their own countries without white aid.
If Black Africans were even capable of keeping a white-created civilization going, one would expect them to be much better off when Apartheid and the economic boycotts of South Africa ended in 1994 and the reins of this first world country were turned over to them.
But the National Bureau of Economic Research found that the average income of blacks in South Africa dropped 40% between 1995 and 2000.
The UN 2006 Human Development Report found that over the last 3 decades Africa has had a “virtual reversal” of human development; South Africa dropped 38 places on the Human Development Index since 1994. (UN Development Programme, 2007).
The country of the world’s first heart transplant (Christian Barnard, Dec., 1967), the Union of South Africa, introduced by whites, is now the rape and murder capital of the world after blacks have gained control.
The deterioration of South Africa since the end of Apartheid refutes egalitarianism.
No country ruled by blacks has escaped self-inflicted devastation; it is fair to conclude that blacks are incapable of achieving or maintaining a modern civilization when left to themselves.
Facts hurt don't they.
Simple logic -
If blacks could run a civilization why are countries now in sub-sahara africa where the whites have pulled out - completely declining? Posts: 149 | From: united kingdom | Registered: Oct 2011
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by cassiterides: The indigenous Arabians i believe are Veddoid, just like India, but they only survive pure-blooded in very small pockets. I believe the darker Arab racial types have a higher degree of Veddid admixture, i don't believe they are pure-blooded Caucasoids who just aquired a darker skin tone through climatic adaptation.
They are proto-Caucasoid or dark Caucasoids and racially non-Negroid. For example the most prominent native maternal marker in the Arabian plateau R0 is the ancestor of the most common European maternal marker H. They are the ancestors of Caucasoids.
Veddoid peopole are far more Negroid in appearance than the average Fulani or Tutsi.
Your system of classification just doesn't work except in your dreams.
Posts: 4028 | From: NW USA | Registered: May 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
LOL, @ this quack even his Sand Nigger Slave does not agree with his "White Caucasian" b.s
The Original Arabs were Black Cushites..
quote:The Ancestors to Leukoderm Eurasians(Cacaziods for the mentally sensitive)-Perahu
quote: Body proportions in Late Pleistocene Europe and modern human origins. T W Holliday
Body proportions covary with climate, apparently as the result of climatic selection. Ontogenic research and migrant studies have demonstrated that body proportions are largely genetically controlled and are under low selective rates; thus studies of body form can provide evidence for evolutionarily short-term dispersals and/or gene flow. Following these observations, competing models of modern human origins yield different predictions concerning body proportion shifts in Late Pleistocene Europe. Replacement predicts that the earliest modern Europeans will possess "tropical" body proportions (assuming Africa is the center of origin), while Regional Continuity permits only minor shifts in body shape, due to climatic change and/or improved cultural buffering. This study tests these predictions via analyses of osteometric data reflective of trunk height and breadth, limb proportions and relative body mass for samples of Early Upper Paleolithic (EUP), Late Upper Paleolithic (LUP) and Mesolithic (MES) humans and 13 recent African and European populations. Results reveal a clear tendency for the EUP sample to cluster with recent Africans, while LUP and MES samples cluster with recent Europeans. These results refute the hypothesis of local continuity in Europe, and are consistent with an interpretation of elevated gene flow (and population dispersal?) from Africa, followed by subsequent climatic adaptation to colder conditions. These data do not, however, preclude the possibility of some (albeit small) contribution of genes from Neandertals to succeeding populations, as is postulated in Bräuer's "Afro-European Sapiens" model.
quote:Brachial and crural indices of European late Upper Paleolithic and Mesolithic humans.
T W Holliday
Among recent humans brachial and crural indices are positively correlated with mean annual temperature, such that high indices are found in tropical groups. However, despite inhabiting glacial Europe, the Upper Paleolithic Europeans possessed high indices, prompting Trinkaus (1981) to argue for gene flow from warmer regions associated with modern human emergence in Europe. In contrast, Frayer et al.(1993) point out that Late Upper Paleolithic and Mesolithic Europeans should not exhibit tropically-adapted limb proportions, since, even assuming replacement, their ancestors had experienced cold stress in glacial Europe for at least 12 millennia. This study investigates three questions tied to the brachial and crural indices among Late Pleistocene and recent humans. First, which limb segments (either proximal or distal) are primarily responsible for variation in brachial and crural indices? Second, are these indices reflective of overall limb elongation? And finally, do the Late Upper Paleolithic and Mesolithic Europeans retain relatively and/or absolutely long limbs? Results indicate that in the lower limb, the distal limb segment contributes most of the variability to intralimb proportions, while in the upper limb the proximal and distal limb segments appear to be equally variable. Additionally, brachial and crural indices do not appear to be a good measure of overall limb length, and thus, while the Late Upper Paleolithic and Mesolithic humans have significantly higher (i.e., tropically-adapted) brachial and crural indices than do recent Europeans, they also have shorter (i.e., cold-adapted) limbs. The somewhat paradoxical retention of "tropical" indices in the context of more "cold-adapted" limb length is best explained as evidence for Replacement in the European Late Pleistocene, followed by gradual cold adaptation in glacial Europe.
quote:Originally posted by Perahu: They(The Black Aboriginal Arabs) are the ancestors of Caucasoids.
[/QB][/QUOTE]
Posts: 8804 | From: The fear of his majesty had entered their hearts, they were powerless | Registered: Nov 2007
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by cassiterides: Blacks had a chance to prove European colonisation was wrong.
But you failed.
Europeans colonised sub-saharan african countries giving them technology and great infrastructure but after european rule collapsed these countries have declined.
Blacks can not run their own countries without white aid.
If Black Africans were even capable of keeping a white-created civilization going, one would expect them to be much better off when Apartheid and the economic boycotts of South Africa ended in 1994 and the reins of this first world country were turned over to them.
But the National Bureau of Economic Research found that the average income of blacks in South Africa dropped 40% between 1995 and 2000.
The UN 2006 Human Development Report found that over the last 3 decades Africa has had a “virtual reversal” of human development; South Africa dropped 38 places on the Human Development Index since 1994. (UN Development Programme, 2007).
The country of the world’s first heart transplant (Christian Barnard, Dec., 1967), the Union of South Africa, introduced by whites, is now the rape and murder capital of the world after blacks have gained control.
The deterioration of South Africa since the end of Apartheid refutes egalitarianism.
No country ruled by blacks has escaped self-inflicted devastation; it is fair to conclude that blacks are incapable of achieving or maintaining a modern civilization when left to themselves.
Facts hurt don't they.
Simple logic -
If blacks could run a civilization why are countries now in sub-sahara africa where the whites have pulled out - completely declining?
You are full of it,south africa is doing much better without white rule,income has gone up for blacks in south africa and blacks even when ruled by whites in south africa help made that country.
The new south africa is a new civilization and blacks are advancing it's culture.so have to tell you that you are DEAD WRONG and about everything else you said.
Posts: 2688 | Registered: Jul 2004
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by element: [QB] @cassiterides...
Human progress, evolution & advancement is integrated ,adapted , coincidental & accidental... so what's your excuse? ....
It's 2012 & your still incapable of original thought , plagiarizing articles & recycling topics..
If you check the original post in this thread i linked to the original source.
Since you've discovered that page, why not read it and admit it is the truth.
Posts: 2408 | From: My mother's basement | Registered: Dec 2010
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Paironuts: Look at South Sudan, without Caucasoid mixed North Sudanese rulers they resort back to their savage Nilotic behavior.
More than 3,000 killed in South Sudan ethnic violence
I honesty doubt people like this build Ancient Nubia.
Ancient Nubians were probably more Caucasoid mixed/influenced than them.
I would laugh at the absurdity of your claims if it weren't for the horrible news, but what are we to make of the so-called caca-soid mixed Arab northerners who enslave, rape young children (including boys), boil children, and burn people alive and whose victims number in the millions. Last time I checked such acts are not part of traditional Nilotic culture.
quote: Haha, they are still Caucasoid despite their skin tone. To you race is probably skin tone, but it is much more than that (skull, hair, DNA, even dental studies reveal racial differences).
They are not Negroid and related to Congoid West Africans, their DNA is closer to people from Iceland than to Negroids. Deal with it.
You have yet to define what race means (to you). If it is more than just skin tone then please define what a "cacasoid" and "negroid" are. Last time I checked you considered Ugandans to be caca-soid mixed and less "negroid" than African Americans. Of course even other white supremacists are not that insane but oh well. Posts: 26236 | From: Atlanta, Georgia, USA | Registered: Feb 2005
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by cassiterides: Yep, Veddoids are not Negroids but Australoid, but you think this is what caucasoid sprung from? My view on caucasoid origins is the polycentric Coonian evolution: H. Erectus > ? > Heidelberg Man > Neanderthal > Cro-Magnon > Caucasoid.
Most of those dark Arabs aren't Veddoid, they are proto-Caucasoid. Their skull is mostly to completely Caucasoid (orthognathous, prominent noses, narrow faces). True Veddoids have broad features found in tropical India.
Also, genetically the native Arabians are ancestral to Europeans by way of maternal marker haplogroup R0 (ancestral to mtDNA H, which is the most common European mtDNA). Veddoid mtDNA M typical of India is more distant.
Posts: 695 | From: وكان المصريون القدماء القوقازين | Registered: Jan 2011
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by cassiterides: The indigenous Arabians i believe are Veddoid, just like India, but they only survive pure-blooded in very small pockets. I believe the darker Arab racial types have a higher degree of Veddid admixture, i don't believe they are pure-blooded Caucasoids who just aquired a darker skin tone through climatic adaptation.
They are proto-Caucasoid or dark Caucasoids and racially non-Negroid. For example the most prominent native maternal marker in the Arabian plateau R0 is the ancestor of the most common European maternal marker H. They are the ancestors of Caucasoids.
Veddoid peopole are far more Negroid in appearance than the average Fulani or Tutsi.
Your system of classification just doesn't work except in your dreams.
(a) Australian (Aborigine) (b) Veddoid or Veddid (i) Gongid (ii) Malid
Hybrid Australoid subraces:
(a) Indo-Melanid (Indid-Veddid intermediate typical of the Dravidian-Caucasoid populations) (b) Kolid (Indo-Melanid subvariety of the Santals, Munda, and other tribes of the northeastern Indian Subcontinent). (c) Tasmanid (Australoid-Negrito admixed)
4. Mongoloid
(a) Palaemongoloid (b) Tungid (c) Sinid (c) Indianid or Amerind (i) Andid (ii) Margid (iii) Lagid (d) Arctid (i) Eskimid (ii) Sibirid
posted
Negroids love to claim all brown races as related to them, when in fact many of those races like Veddoids, proto-Caucasoids, Australoids, Capoids are extremely distant from Negroids genetically.
It's like White Caucasoids claiming White Mongoloids (like Japs) as related to them, lol, when in fact they are genetically and anthropometrically extremely distant.
Posts: 695 | From: وكان المصريون القدماء القوقازين | Registered: Jan 2011
| IP: Logged |
quote:please define what a "cacasoid" and "negroid" are.
excluding the pigmentation of skin -
Caucasoid
Reduced or no prognathism (orthognathic) Leptorrhine (thin) nose Prominent nasal spine Thin nasal bridge + interorbital area Nasal Index: - 48 mm Prominent nasal sill Tear shaped nasal hole(s) Prominent chin Thin lips Larger supraorbital (brow) ridges Microdont (small) teeth Cymotrichous (wavy) hair Full range of hair and eye colours
Negroid
Extreme facial prognathism Platyrrhine (wide) nose Reduced nasal spine Wide nasal bridge + interorbital area Nasal Index: 53 + mm Absent Nasal sill Round shaped nasal hole(s) Rounder chin Thick lips Reduced supraorbital (brow) ridges Macrodont (large) teeth Ulotrichous (wooly) hair Only dark hair and dark eyes
Mongoloid
Moderate facial prognathism Mesorrhine (medium) nose Medium nasal spine Moderate nasal bridge + interorbital area Nasal Index: 48-53 Less prominent nasal sill Oval shaped nasal hole(s) Slightly prominent chin Moderate lips Small supraorbital (brow) ridges Mesadont (medium) teeth Shovel-shaped incisors Leiotrichous (straight) hair Epicanthic folds (slanted eyes) Predominant dark hair and dark eyes
Sources
Bass, William M. 1995. Human Osteology: A Laboratory and Field Manual. Columbia: Missouri Archaeological Society, Inc.
Coon, Origin of Races. 1962.
Eckert, William G. 1997. Introduction to Forensic Science. United States of America: CRC Press, Inc.
EI-Najjar, Mahmoud Y. and K Richard McWilliams 1978. Forensic Anthropology: The Structure, Morphology and Variation of Human Bone and Dentition. Illinois: Charles C. Thomas.
Gill, George W. 1998. "Craniofacial Criteria in the Skeletal Attribution of Race. " In Forensic Osteology: Advances in the Identification of Human Remains. (2nd edition) Reichs, Kathleen l(ed.), pp.293- 315.
Gill, George W. 1986. "Craniofacial Criteria in Forensic Identification." In Forensic Osteology: Advances in the identification of Human Remains. Reichs, KI(ed.). pp. 143- 159. Springfield: Charles C.
Krogman, Wilton Marion and Mehmet Yascar Iscan 1986. The Human Skeleton in Forensic Medicine. Springfield: Charles C.Thomas.
Lahr, Marta Mirazon 1996. The Evolution of Modern Human Diversity: A Study of Cranial Variation. Britain: University Press, Cambridge. Thomas.
Post, Richard H. 1969. Tear Duet Size Differences of Age, Sex and Race. American Journal of Physical Anthropology. 30:85-88.
Ubelaker, Douglas H. 1989. Human Skeletal Remains: Excavation, Analysis and Interpretation. Washington: Taraxacum.
Posts: 2408 | From: My mother's basement | Registered: Dec 2010
| IP: Logged |
posted
So Called "Cacaziods" are nothing but depigmented Africans, you are not a seperate race nor are you superior. Arabs are the most ass backward people in history, even today their savage backward culture is at odds with modern Civilization.
H.G R possible evolved in Africa, and your ancestors came from Africa..
quote:Originally posted by Perahu: Negroids love to claim all brown races as related to them, when in fact many of those races like Veddoids, proto-Caucasoids, Australoids, Capoids are extremely distant from Negroids genetically.
It's like White Caucasoids claiming White Mongoloids (like Japs) as related to them, lol, when in fact they are genetically and anthropometrically extremely distant.
Posts: 8804 | From: The fear of his majesty had entered their hearts, they were powerless | Registered: Nov 2007
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Perahu: Negroids love to claim all brown races as related to them, when in fact many of those races like Veddoids, proto-Caucasoids, Australoids, Capoids are extremely distant from Negroids genetically.
It's like White Caucasoids claiming White Mongoloids (like Japs) as related to them, lol, when in fact they are genetically and anthropometrically extremely distant.
They claim that ''africans'' have the most phenotypic diversity in the world.
However africa has been inhabited historically the longest time by the most races - so of course it has the most phenotypic diversity.
The afronuts though think all africans = one race, or that they are apart of some pseudo-grouping ''tropical africans'' when africans = caucasoid, capoid, negroid etc.
They cluster capoids, caucasoids etc as ''tropical african'' or ''black'' out of self-hatred of their own phenotype.
One thing i've noticed on this forum is that the black posters here all hate the negro phenotype. None of them want it and they want to cluster themselves with north africans who have finer less ugly features since they are caucasoid/or admixed.
Posts: 2408 | From: My mother's basement | Registered: Dec 2010
| IP: Logged |
posted
LOL, You have got to be kidding me. The main perpetraitors of violence in Sudan are the brainwashed Northern Sudanese who get their rapist violent tendencies from that collection of bullshit known as the Koran.
LMFAO, Dude Ive read that book, nothing but a violent Sex Cult, its so funny how you Leukoderm Arabs try to leech off of other civilizations. First Persia, then Andalucia, Then North Africa and Egypt and now you leeches are trying to steal Nubia..
quote:Originally posted by Paironuts: Look at South Sudan, without Caucasoid mixed North Sudanese rulers they resort back to their savage Nilotic behavior.
More than 3,000 killed in South Sudan ethnic violence
quote:So Called "Cacaziods" are nothing but depigmented Africans
The only fully depigmentated Caucasoids are Nordics. Most Caucasoids are around 20 on the Luschan Scale - an olive or tanned complexion.
You are an embarrassment to anthropology, as you think race is merely defined by skin colour.
Posts: 2408 | From: My mother's basement | Registered: Dec 2010
| IP: Logged |
First off White Asians did not originate in Europe, they originated in Asia, Tropical Africans the ancestors of both Cacaziods and Negriods originated in Africa.
If were not for Africans going to Europe and Mutating the genes for Lightskin, you would not exist.
Race is invalid, did you not suggest taking a basic Anthropology class...take your own advice.
quote: Body proportions in Late Pleistocene Europe and modern human origins. T W Holliday
Body proportions covary with climate, apparently as the result of climatic selection. Ontogenic research and migrant studies have demonstrated that body proportions are largely genetically controlled and are under low selective rates; thus studies of body form can provide evidence for evolutionarily short-term dispersals and/or gene flow. Following these observations, competing models of modern human origins yield different predictions concerning body proportion shifts in Late Pleistocene Europe. Replacement predicts that the earliest modern Europeans will possess "tropical" body proportions (assuming Africa is the center of origin), while Regional Continuity permits only minor shifts in body shape, due to climatic change and/or improved cultural buffering. This study tests these predictions via analyses of osteometric data reflective of trunk height and breadth, limb proportions and relative body mass for samples of Early Upper Paleolithic (EUP), Late Upper Paleolithic (LUP) and Mesolithic (MES) humans and 13 recent African and European populations. Results reveal a clear tendency for the EUP sample to cluster with recent Africans, while LUP and MES samples cluster with recent Europeans. These results refute the hypothesis of local continuity in Europe, and are consistent with an interpretation of elevated gene flow (and population dispersal?) from Africa, followed by subsequent climatic adaptation to colder conditions. These data do not, however, preclude the possibility of some (albeit small) contribution of genes from Neandertals to succeeding populations, as is postulated in Bräuer's "Afro-European Sapiens" model.
quote:Brachial and crural indices of European late Upper Paleolithic and Mesolithic humans.
T W Holliday
Among recent humans brachial and crural indices are positively correlated with mean annual temperature, such that high indices are found in tropical groups. However, despite inhabiting glacial Europe, the Upper Paleolithic Europeans possessed high indices, prompting Trinkaus (1981) to argue for gene flow from warmer regions associated with modern human emergence in Europe. In contrast, Frayer et al.(1993) point out that Late Upper Paleolithic and Mesolithic Europeans should not exhibit tropically-adapted limb proportions, since, even assuming replacement, their ancestors had experienced cold stress in glacial Europe for at least 12 millennia. This study investigates three questions tied to the brachial and crural indices among Late Pleistocene and recent humans. First, which limb segments (either proximal or distal) are primarily responsible for variation in brachial and crural indices? Second, are these indices reflective of overall limb elongation? And finally, do the Late Upper Paleolithic and Mesolithic Europeans retain relatively and/or absolutely long limbs? Results indicate that in the lower limb, the distal limb segment contributes most of the variability to intralimb proportions, while in the upper limb the proximal and distal limb segments appear to be equally variable. Additionally, brachial and crural indices do not appear to be a good measure of overall limb length, and thus, while the Late Upper Paleolithic and Mesolithic humans have significantly higher (i.e., tropically-adapted) brachial and crural indices than do recent Europeans, they also have shorter (i.e., cold-adapted) limbs. The somewhat paradoxical retention of "tropical" indices in the context of more "cold-adapted" limb length is best explained as evidence for Replacement in the European Late Pleistocene, followed by gradual cold adaptation in glacial Europe.
quote:Originally posted by Perahu:
It's like White Caucasoids claiming White Mongoloids (like Japs) as related to them, lol, when in fact they are genetically and anthropometrically extremely distant.
Posts: 8804 | From: The fear of his majesty had entered their hearts, they were powerless | Registered: Nov 2007
| IP: Logged |
posted
You are stupid, Your Dumbass just claimed that all Cacaziods are white then in the same breath claim the only Depigmented Cacaziods are "Nordics".
Your stupid clown ass switches your argument however you choose.
Go away and read your 20th century books by Coon.
quote:Originally posted by cassiterides:
quote:So Called "Cacaziods" are nothing but depigmented Africans
The only fully depigmentated Caucasoids are Nordics. Most Caucasoids are around 20 on the Luschan Scale - an olive or tanned complexion.
You are an embarrassment to anthropology, as you think race is merely defined by skin colour.
Posts: 8804 | From: The fear of his majesty had entered their hearts, they were powerless | Registered: Nov 2007
| IP: Logged |
Soooooo...you would have NOOOOO problem with your sister or your daughter bringing this man home as a husband if she loved him dearly and he could well provide for all her needs and wants, then, correct? You would have nooooo problem with this man being your brother-in-law/the father of your niece/nephew or your son-in-law/father of your grandchild(ren), correct?
Since he is completely 'caucasoid'....ijs....
Posts: 3446 | From: U.S. by way of JA by way of Africa | Registered: Jan 2010
| IP: Logged |
If you studied physical anthropology as you claim you would know the luschan scale. But as we both know you are no anthropology student, you probably have a job in mcdonalds and get upset serving to white people all day that you log on your computer at night to vent some anger.
Posts: 2408 | From: My mother's basement | Registered: Dec 2010
| IP: Logged |
posted
Show me how this in any proves that Cacaziods/White Europeans are not depigmented Africans.
quote: Body proportions in Late Pleistocene Europe and modern human origins. T W Holliday
Body proportions covary with climate, apparently as the result of climatic selection. Ontogenic research and migrant studies have demonstrated that body proportions are largely genetically controlled and are under low selective rates; thus studies of body form can provide evidence for evolutionarily short-term dispersals and/or gene flow. Following these observations, competing models of modern human origins yield different predictions concerning body proportion shifts in Late Pleistocene Europe. Replacement predicts that the earliest modern Europeans will possess "tropical" body proportions (assuming Africa is the center of origin), while Regional Continuity permits only minor shifts in body shape, due to climatic change and/or improved cultural buffering. This study tests these predictions via analyses of osteometric data reflective of trunk height and breadth, limb proportions and relative body mass for samples of Early Upper Paleolithic (EUP), Late Upper Paleolithic (LUP) and Mesolithic (MES) humans and 13 recent African and European populations. Results reveal a clear tendency for the EUP sample to cluster with recent Africans, while LUP and MES samples cluster with recent Europeans. These results refute the hypothesis of local continuity in Europe, and are consistent with an interpretation of elevated gene flow (and population dispersal?) from Africa, followed by subsequent climatic adaptation to colder conditions. These data do not, however, preclude the possibility of some (albeit small) contribution of genes from Neandertals to succeeding populations, as is postulated in Bräuer's "Afro-European Sapiens" model.
quote:Brachial and crural indices of European late Upper Paleolithic and Mesolithic humans.
T W Holliday
Among recent humans brachial and crural indices are positively correlated with mean annual temperature, such that high indices are found in tropical groups. However, despite inhabiting glacial Europe, the Upper Paleolithic Europeans possessed high indices, prompting Trinkaus (1981) to argue for gene flow from warmer regions associated with modern human emergence in Europe. In contrast, Frayer et al.(1993) point out that Late Upper Paleolithic and Mesolithic Europeans should not exhibit tropically-adapted limb proportions, since, even assuming replacement, their ancestors had experienced cold stress in glacial Europe for at least 12 millennia. This study investigates three questions tied to the brachial and crural indices among Late Pleistocene and recent humans. First, which limb segments (either proximal or distal) are primarily responsible for variation in brachial and crural indices? Second, are these indices reflective of overall limb elongation? And finally, do the Late Upper Paleolithic and Mesolithic Europeans retain relatively and/or absolutely long limbs? Results indicate that in the lower limb, the distal limb segment contributes most of the variability to intralimb proportions, while in the upper limb the proximal and distal limb segments appear to be equally variable. Additionally, brachial and crural indices do not appear to be a good measure of overall limb length, and thus, while the Late Upper Paleolithic and Mesolithic humans have significantly higher (i.e., tropically-adapted) brachial and crural indices than do recent Europeans, they also have shorter (i.e., cold-adapted) limbs. The somewhat paradoxical retention of "tropical" indices in the context of more "cold-adapted" limb length is best explained as evidence for Replacement in the European Late Pleistocene, followed by gradual cold adaptation in glacial Europe.
We are talking about Genetics here..the SLC24A5 allele.
Get a clue.
quote:Originally posted by cassiterides: White/Caucasoid = 1-21 on the Luschan Scale.
A breakdown -
I: 1-5 fully depigmentated, pale white II: 6-10 light skin III: 11-15 light intermediate IV: 16-21 olive skin
Types V and VI are non-Caucasoid.
full depigmentation is only 1-5 (Yype I), which less than 10% of Europeans have, only a minority of northern europeans.
white covers a scope of light skin shades, see above.
dermatologists and athropologists still use this classification today.
If you studied physical anthropology as you claim you would know the luschan scale. But as we both know you are no anthropology student, you probably have a job in mcdonalds and get upset serving to white people all day that you log on your computer at night to vent some anger.
Posts: 8804 | From: The fear of his majesty had entered their hearts, they were powerless | Registered: Nov 2007
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by cassiterides: They claim that ''africans'' have the most phenotypic diversity in the world.
However africa has been inhabited historically the longest time by the most races - so of course it has the most phenotypic diversity.
The afronuts though think all africans = one race, or that they are apart of some pseudo-grouping ''tropical africans'' when africans = caucasoid, capoid, negroid etc.
They cluster capoids, caucasoids etc as ''tropical african'' or ''black'' out of self-hatred of their own phenotype.
One thing i've noticed on this forum is that the black posters here all hate the negro phenotype. None of them want it and they want to cluster themselves with north africans who have finer less ugly features since they are caucasoid/or admixed.
All true!
quote:Originally posted by cassiterides: Hey Perahu have you ever seen the film 13th warrior?
Nope, is it a good film?
Posts: 695 | From: وكان المصريون القدماء القوقازين | Registered: Jan 2011
| IP: Logged |
If you studied physical anthropology as you claim you would know the luschan scale. But as we both know you are no anthropology student, you probably have a job in mcdonalds and get upset serving to white people all day that you log on your computer at night to vent some anger.
Spencer wells: we as a species are less genetically diverse than other primates. "It's worth getting the message out, that we are related to one another, that we are much more closely related genetically than people may suspect from glancing around and looking at these surface features that distinguish us; so that's an important social message," Wells says. "Race, in terms of deep-seated biological differences, doesn't exist scientifically. We are 99.9 per cent identical roughly, at the genetic level. That's actually a remarkably low level of genetic diversity compared to other species of large primates. It represents a population bottleneck event some 70,000 years ago when the population dropped down to as few as 2,000 people. We came back from that, and our genome reflects that."Posts: 1064 | Registered: Jan 2011
| IP: Logged |
Soooooo...you would have NOOOOO problem with your sister or your daughter bringing this man home as a husband if she loved him dearly and he could well provide for all her needs and wants, then, correct? You would have nooooo problem with this man being your brother-in-law/the father of your niece/nephew or your son-in-law/father of your grandchild(ren), correct?
Since he is completely 'caucasoid'....ijs....
He's clarified that in his view that is a proto-caucasoid, not a caucasoid proper. He's too dark to be a caucasoid.
My own view though is that man pictured is Veddoid admixed (like many arabs). Far too dark to be a pure caucasoid in my opinion.
The darkest caucasoids (whites) are mediterraneans who have an olive, light brown or ''brunet-white'' skin shade, typical of southern italians and many greeks.
Posts: 2408 | From: My mother's basement | Registered: Dec 2010
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by TruthAndRights: Soooooo...you would have NOOOOO problem with your sister or your daughter bringing this man home as a husband if she loved him dearly and he could well provide for all her needs and wants, then, correct? You would have nooooo problem with this man being your brother-in-law/the father of your niece/nephew or your son-in-law/father of your grandchild(ren), correct?
Since he is completely 'caucasoid'....ijs....
Religion would be the main issue, since my family is Eastern Orthodox. But I wouldn't see him as that racial different, his skull and facial features are Caucasoid.
Posts: 695 | From: وكان المصريون القدماء القوقازين | Registered: Jan 2011
| IP: Logged |
posted
So True, a basic tenant of Biology and Genetics, yet these clows sit up hee trying to link themselves to cultures they had nothing to do with via their defunct Obsolete "Cacaziod" b.s.
quote:Originally posted by asante-Korton: Race doesnt exist get over it
Spencer wells: we as a species are less genetically diverse than other primates. "It's worth getting the message out, that we are related to one another, that we are much more closely related genetically than people may suspect from glancing around and looking at these surface features that distinguish us; so that's an important social message," Wells says. "Race, in terms of deep-seated biological differences, doesn't exist scientifically. We are 99.9 per cent identical roughly, at the genetic level. That's actually a remarkably low level of genetic diversity compared to other species of large primates. It represents a population bottleneck event some 70,000 years ago when the population dropped down to as few as 2,000 people. We came back from that, and our genome reflects that."
Posts: 8804 | From: The fear of his majesty had entered their hearts, they were powerless | Registered: Nov 2007
| IP: Logged |
quote: Body proportions in Late Pleistocene Europe and modern human origins. T W Holliday
Body proportions covary with climate, apparently as the result of climatic selection. Ontogenic research and migrant studies have demonstrated that body proportions are largely genetically controlled and are under low selective rates; thus studies of body form can provide evidence for evolutionarily short-term dispersals and/or gene flow. Following these observations, competing models of modern human origins yield different predictions concerning body proportion shifts in Late Pleistocene Europe. Replacement predicts that the earliest modern Europeans will possess "tropical" body proportions (assuming Africa is the center of origin), while Regional Continuity permits only minor shifts in body shape, due to climatic change and/or improved cultural buffering. This study tests these predictions via analyses of osteometric data reflective of trunk height and breadth, limb proportions and relative body mass for samples of Early Upper Paleolithic (EUP), Late Upper Paleolithic (LUP) and Mesolithic (MES) humans and 13 recent African and European populations. Results reveal a clear tendency for the EUP sample to cluster with recent Africans, while LUP and MES samples cluster with recent Europeans. These results refute the hypothesis of local continuity in Europe, and are consistent with an interpretation of elevated gene flow (and population dispersal?) from Africa, followed by subsequent climatic adaptation to colder conditions. These data do not, however, preclude the possibility of some (albeit small) contribution of genes from Neandertals to succeeding populations, as is postulated in Bräuer's "Afro-European Sapiens" model.
quote:Brachial and crural indices of European late Upper Paleolithic and Mesolithic humans.
T W Holliday
Among recent humans brachial and crural indices are positively correlated with mean annual temperature, such that high indices are found in tropical groups. However, despite inhabiting glacial Europe, the Upper Paleolithic Europeans possessed high indices, prompting Trinkaus (1981) to argue for gene flow from warmer regions associated with modern human emergence in Europe. In contrast, Frayer et al.(1993) point out that Late Upper Paleolithic and Mesolithic Europeans should not exhibit tropically-adapted limb proportions, since, even assuming replacement, their ancestors had experienced cold stress in glacial Europe for at least 12 millennia. This study investigates three questions tied to the brachial and crural indices among Late Pleistocene and recent humans. First, which limb segments (either proximal or distal) are primarily responsible for variation in brachial and crural indices? Second, are these indices reflective of overall limb elongation? And finally, do the Late Upper Paleolithic and Mesolithic Europeans retain relatively and/or absolutely long limbs? Results indicate that in the lower limb, the distal limb segment contributes most of the variability to intralimb proportions, while in the upper limb the proximal and distal limb segments appear to be equally variable. Additionally, brachial and crural indices do not appear to be a good measure of overall limb length, and thus, while the Late Upper Paleolithic and Mesolithic humans have significantly higher (i.e., tropically-adapted) brachial and crural indices than do recent Europeans, they also have shorter (i.e., cold-adapted) limbs. The somewhat paradoxical retention of "tropical" indices in the context of more "cold-adapted" limb length is best explained as evidence for Replacement in the European Late Pleistocene, followed by gradual cold adaptation in glacial Europe.
quote:Body proportions covary with climate, apparently as the result of climatic selection. Ontogenetic research and migrant studies have demonstrated that body proportions are largely genetically controlled and are under low selective rates; thus studies of body form can provide evidence for evolutionarily short-term dispersals and/or gene flow. Following these observations, competing models of modern human origins yield different predictions concerning body proportion shifts in Late Pleistocene Europe. Replacement predicts that the earliest modern Europeans will possess “tropical” body proportions (assuming Africa is the center of origin), while Regional Continuity permits only minor shifts in body shape, due to climatic change and/or improved cultural buffering. This study tests these predictions via analyses of osteometric data reflective of trunk height and breadth, limb proportions and relative body mass for samples of Early Upper Paleolithic (EUP), Late Upper Paleolithic (LUP) and Mesolithic (MES) humans and 13 recent African and European populations.Results reveal a clear tendency for the EUP sample to cluster with recent Africans, while LUP and MES samples cluster with recent Europeans. These results refute the hypothesis of local continuity in Europe, and are consistent with an interpretation of elevated gene flow (and population dispersal?) from Africa, followed by subsequent climatic adaptation to colder conditions. These data do not, however, preclude the possibility of some (albeit small) contribution of genes from Neandertals to succeeding populations, as is postulated in Bräuer’s “Afro-European Sapiens” model.
-Body proportions in Late Pleistocene Europe and modern human origins☆
...
quote:"In other words, all non-Africans carry M168. Of course, Africans carrying the M168 mutation today are the descendants of the African subpopulation from which the migrants originated.... Thus, the Australian/Eurasian Adam (the ancestor of all non-Africans) was an East African Man. "
-Cavalli-Sforza: Genes, Culture, and Human Evolution. Pg 187.
Depigmented Africans trying to claim they gave Africans our features..
Posts: 8804 | From: The fear of his majesty had entered their hearts, they were powerless | Registered: Nov 2007
| IP: Logged |
posted
More Ducking and dodging...lol. Its clear your very existance hinges on your non existant ties to the advanced cultures of the Nile Valley and Horn of Africa.
Recheck that list, see how far away you are. My forefathers are closer to the A. Egyptians..
Truth Hurt don't it...Sand Nigger you would have been a slave to my Cousins in Km.t
Pure Negriod, Pure cacasiod...WAAAAAA...WAAAAAAAA...
quote:Originally posted by Perahu: They were mixed race. Not pure Negroids.
What does a pure Negroid score on this? We need comparisons.
Posts: 8804 | From: The fear of his majesty had entered their hearts, they were powerless | Registered: Nov 2007
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by -Just Call Me Jari-: More Ducking and dodging...lol. Its clear your very existance hinges on your non existant ties to the advanced cultures of the Nile Valley and Horn of Africa.
Recheck that list, see how far away you are. My forefathers are closer to the A. Egyptians..
Truth Hurt don't it...Sand Nigger you would have been a slave to my Cousins in Km.t
Pure Negriod, Pure cacasiod...WAAAAAA...WAAAAAAAA...
I just looked at the Amarna mummies thread and there were many inaccuracies posted about that 'study'.
It is not an academic peer-review study anyway, so it's crap.
Posts: 695 | From: وكان المصريون القدماء القوقازين | Registered: Jan 2011
| IP: Logged |
posted
None of the bullshit you spout is peer reviewed..
its results are still valid...From Dinekes
Dinekes: But these qualitative observations are no substitute for the harder type of evidence that can be provided by authentic ancient DNA.
quote:They seem to indicate that there is something definitely "African" about this collection of mummies.
....
But these qualitative observations are no substitute for the harder type of evidence that can be provided by authentic ancient DNA.
Get your bitch ass back to your tent sand nigger..
quote:Originally posted by Perahu:
quote:Originally posted by -Just Call Me Jari-: More Ducking and dodging...lol. Its clear your very existance hinges on your non existant ties to the advanced cultures of the Nile Valley and Horn of Africa.
Recheck that list, see how far away you are. My forefathers are closer to the A. Egyptians..
Truth Hurt don't it...Sand Nigger you would have been a slave to my Cousins in Km.t
Pure Negriod, Pure cacasiod...WAAAAAA...WAAAAAAAA...
quote:Originally posted by Perahu: They were mixed race. Not pure Negroids.
What does a pure Negroid score on this? We need comparisons.
I just looked at the Amarna mummies thread and there were many inaccuracies posted about that study.
It is not a peer-review study anyway, so it's crap.
Posts: 8804 | From: The fear of his majesty had entered their hearts, they were powerless | Registered: Nov 2007
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by -Just Call Me Jari-: Recap
The Original Arabs were Black Cushites..
They are not your cousins, Mr. Congoid. If you test their DNA it will match people in Iceland better than yours! Haha, loser.
Posts: 695 | From: وكان المصريون القدماء القوقازين | Registered: Jan 2011
| IP: Logged |
posted
You are a depigmented African, you are not of a special race, you are not original, you are not civilized.
Barbarian you have nothing, you were the bitches of the Kushites for thousands of years. Without them you'd still be wiping your arse with Sandpaper...
Your religion, Script, philosophy etc. comes from Cushites and Nilotics.
Ass backward Barbarian....you are unoriginal. LMAO.
Truth Hurt Don't it.
quote:Originally posted by Perahu:
quote:Originally posted by -Just Call Me Jari-: Recap
The Original Arabs were Black Cushites..
They are not your cousins, Mr. Congoid. If you test their DNA it will match people in Iceland better than yours! Haha, loser.
Posts: 8804 | From: The fear of his majesty had entered their hearts, they were powerless | Registered: Nov 2007
| IP: Logged |
posted
You are just a mixed-breed Pygmy, you are not of a special race, you are not original, you are not civilized.
You have no relationship to Afro-Asiatic Hamites, know your place Mr. Congoid.
quote:Originally posted by -Just Call Me Jari-: You are a depigmented African, you are not of a special race, you are not original, you are not civilized.
Barbarian you have nothing, you were the bitches of the Kushites for thousands of years. Without them you'd still be wiping your arse with Sandpaper...
Your religion, Script, philosophy etc. comes from Cushites and Nilotics.
Ass backward Barbarian....you are unoriginal. LMAO.
Truth Hurt Don't it.
Posts: 695 | From: وكان المصريون القدماء القوقازين | Registered: Jan 2011
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by -Just Call Me Jari-: I never claimed the Black Arabs to be my Cousins dumbass sandnigger..
quote:Originally posted by Perahu: I wasn't talking about those mummies dumbass Congoid.
what exactly is your heritage? do you even know?
You seem to hate negroids/sub-saharan africans and attatch yourself with anything outside of sub-saharan africa such as sumeria or ancient egypt.
Posts: 2408 | From: My mother's basement | Registered: Dec 2010
| IP: Logged |
posted
Im West African on my Mothers Side and African/Creole(French) on my Fathers. Other than that I don't know of any extra admixture.
I have no problems with "Negriods" unlike you I don't need to claim everyone under the sun from Sumarians, Egyptians, Aryans, etc as part of my race. I never claimed the A. Egyptians were of my "race" nor do I advocate race.
All I have said is that The Egyptians and My ancestors descend from the same population(Saharans). They created Km.t My ancestors created Ghana.
Eurasian Arabs and Spainard Muslims wrote Highly of my ancestors...
quote:[He] Gives an audience to his people, in order to listen to their complaints and set them right…he sits in a pavilion around which stand 10 horses with gold embodied trappings. Behind the king stand 10 pages holding shields and gold mounted swords; on his right are the sons of princes of his empire, splendidly clad and with gold plaited in their hair. Before him sits the high priest, and behind the high priest sit the other priests…The door of the pavilion is guarded by dogs of an excellent breed who almost never leave the king's presence and who wear collars of gold and silver studded with bells of the same material.
quote:Originally posted by cassiterides: what exactly is your heritage? do you even know?
You seem to hate negroids/sub-saharan africans and attatch yourself with anything outside of sub-saharan africa such as sumeria or ancient egypt.
This is a typical phenomenon among mongrel North American Afroloonies with no heritage. You will never find ethnic Africans behaving in this way, they have more dignity.
Posts: 695 | From: وكان المصريون القدماء القوقازين | Registered: Jan 2011
| IP: Logged |
posted
LOL, Sand Nigger Bitch now you are gonna cry. You come on here disrespecting Africans Im going to Burn your ass, because I know history, European, Arab and African.
Most Africans don't take you Sand Niggers serious, they know how irrelevent you are but many posters here are Not African American, I probably the only one.
Go whine like a bitch to someone else, you faggot sand nigger bitch. You come here disrespecting my people Im going to give it back to you 100 fold.
quote:Originally posted by Perahu:
quote:Originally posted by cassiterides: what exactly is your heritage? do you even know?
You seem to hate negroids/sub-saharan africans and attatch yourself with anything outside of sub-saharan africa such as sumeria or ancient egypt.
This is a typical phenomenon among mongrel North American Afroloonies with no heritage. You will never find ethnic Africans behaving in this way, they have more dignifity.
Posts: 8804 | From: The fear of his majesty had entered their hearts, they were powerless | Registered: Nov 2007
| IP: Logged |
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
![[Smile]](smile.gif)
![[Embarrassed]](redface.gif)
![[Roll Eyes]](rolleyes.gif)
Since he is completely 'caucasoid'....ijs....
Printer-friendly view of this topic