posted
There are various anthropometric measurements you can do to determine your race - Caucasoid, Negroid or Mongoloid. And all you need is a pencil (or pen).
The following 3 simple measurements (written for my blog) i learned while studying my course in forensic anthropology a few years back.
Prognathism
Negroids are noted for pronounced alveolar prognathism, or an anterior protrusion, of the jaw region (Giles & Elliot, 1962; Bass, 1995, p. 92) as well as sub-nasal prognathism (Topinard, 1894). Caucasoids however are orthognathous or have reduced prognathism (Coon, 1962; Bass, 1995, p. 88). Mongoloids are in-between, mesognathous (El-Najjar & McWilliams, 1978, p. 75). Prognathism can be identified by its facial angle and is useful in determining race (Ranke, 1923):
There is a simple way to measure your degree of prognathism, first make sure your jaw is occluded (closed) with teeth touching together, and then place a pencil (or pen) vertically ''with one end on the nasal spine midline at base of nasal aperture'' (Bass, 1995, p. 87). If the other side of the pencil (or pen) touches, or is very close to the chin then you are orthognathous (Caucasoid).
Nasal Sill
The nasal sill or dam is only found sharply pronounced in Caucasoids, and is completely absent in Negroids who instead have a nasal gutter (Bass, 1995, pp. 83-87; Gill & Rhine, 1990). A nasal sill is the soft-tissue continuation of the ala as it curves to join the columella at the nasal spine. It basically represents the floor of the nostril. In Caucasoids the nasal sill appears most visible. To see if you have a nasal sill, with a pencil ''resting against the bone of the maxilla just below the nasal opening, try to run the pencil or pen gently into the nasal opening'' (Bass, 1995, p. 83). This most easily works in fact i found if you tilt your head back, as you look into a mirror while gently running the pencil into the nasal hole. The appearance of a sharp nasal sill is a marker of Caucasoid ancestry.
Facial Flatness
Facial flatness appears in Mongoloids due to the anterior projection of the malar or zygomatic (cheek) bones (Bass, 1995, p. 92). A simple way to measure facial flatness is to lay on your back with your head touching the ground with your face looking upwards, balancing a pencil or pen across the nasal aperture. If you can insert your fingers between the pencil (or pen) and the cheekbone under the lateral edge of the eye, then you do not have a flat face or anterior projection of the cheekbone.
Sources -
Bass, William M. Human Osteology: A Laboratory and Field Manual. Columbia: Missouri Archaeological Society, Inc. 1995.
Coon. Carleton. Origin of Races. 1962.
EI-Najjar, Mahmoud Y. and K Richard McWilliams. Forensic Anthropology: The Structure, Morphology and Variation of Human Bone and Dentition. Illinois: Charles C. Thomas. 1978.
Giles, E., and O. Elliot. Race Identification From Cranial Measurements. Journal of Forensic Sciences 7:147-156, 1962.
Topinard. Paul. Anthropology. 1894.
Ubelaker, Douglas H. Human Skeletal Remains: Excavation, Analysis and Interpretation. Washington: Taraxacum, 1989.
======
Therefore with these simple measurements you can establish with high probability your race.
Posts: 2408 | From: My mother's basement | Registered: Dec 2010
| IP: Logged |
As you can see the Negroid has a very different facial angulation to the Caucasoid. Secondly you can also see that the prognathism of the Negro prevents a pencil from the nasal spine touching the chin.
Posts: 2408 | From: My mother's basement | Registered: Dec 2010
| IP: Logged |
posted
Some of you are far too offended about my simply posting scientific fact. But if that diagram is too emotional for some of you, I propose another method which I happen to find more enjoyable.
Look at the images below
Now, if you felt any sensation in your respective male or female sexual organs to either, you are Caucasoid. Wishing all a good day.
Examples of a Caucasoid couple preparing to evolve the rest of the animal kingdom through sexual relationships.
Attendants of a fur suit festival in the United States.
Posts: 11 | From: Furaffinity | Registered: Jan 2012
| IP: Logged |
posted
Hi TP,for the longest I thought you were a guy,well it's nice to see another beautiful sista holding her own along with T&R,Dena,Arwa and Loc Diva..
Posts: 6546 | From: japan | Registered: Feb 2009
| IP: Logged |
posted
I guess Mugabe must be "caucasoid", since he lacks the prognathic profile in cassiterrides "idealized" caricatures "diagrams" above.
-------------------- The Complete Picture of the Past tells Us what Not to Repeat Posts: 7516 | From: Somewhere on Earth | Registered: Jan 2008
| IP: Logged |
-------------------- The Complete Picture of the Past tells Us what Not to Repeat Posts: 7516 | From: Somewhere on Earth | Registered: Jan 2008
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by casshiterides: Some of you are far too offended about my simply posting scientific fact. But if that diagram is too emotional for some of you, I propose another method which I happen to find more enjoyable.
Look at the images below
Now, if you felt any sensation in your respective male or female sexual organs to either, you are Caucasoid. Wishing all a good day.
Examples of a Caucasoid couple preparing to evolve the rest of the animal kingdom through sexual relationships.
Attendants of a fur suit festival in the United States.
^^lol.. Sterling Caucasoid "role models" at work.. And yet, a hidden resentment, envy and jealously seems to permeate many Caucasiod race proponents, some white authors maintain.
The "racial reality" work below cited by race proponents seems strangely obsessed with black penis size. This may be part of the inferiority complex seen in white racists.
Racial Reality authors Sarich and Miele, cite a number of Greek depictions of Africans that show black penis sizes as larger than that of nearby whites. QUOTE:
"The genitalia of black Africans were also deemed noteworthy to the Greek and Roman artists. Within the same art piece, black males are depicted with penises larger than those of white figures, and in others are shown as being erect." --Vincent Sarich, Frank Miele. 2005. Race: The Reality of Human Differences. pg 41
Obsession with black penis size also enters into the work of other racist authors, like JP Rushton, who conducted detailed "self-assessment" in penis size compared to the potency exhibited by Negroid [sic] data..
QUOTE: "Then there is the issue of Rushton's data and disparate sources one of the most heavily cited in his earlier workd is an 1898 book, by an anonymous French army surgeon, a repository of anecdotal information about the penis, breast, and buttock size of different native populations. His reliance on these kinds of data led to some strong criticism. More recently Rushton has used a wider variety of sources, including census data, studies of military recruits, and brain scanning techniques. He argues that such data reinforce his original conclusion that human populations can be ordered in a scale of evolutionary advance from blacks, to whites, to Orientals." --Stringer and McKee, African Exodus 1996
and -- more obsession with Negro indexes on penis size. Note trembling "self-assessment" by white "biodiversity" author Rushton.. QUOTE:
"No criteria are ever set up to decide how these groups are established or what traits should be used in determin- ing membership. This means that his acceptance of "race" is ultimately arbitrary and subjective. When "the races" are compared in terms of appearance and performance in the quantities of uncritically collected data assembled in his book, "racial" identity is determined by "self-assessment." Rushton's basic units, then, are rooted in folk belief and not in biology.
The possibility that the vast majority of the human biological traits that have been shaped by evolution are clinally and independently distributed in association with the relevant selective forces is never once considered, and the word cline is simply missing. One running concern is how these folk categories compare on such matters as intelligence and reproductive behavior. Sex rears its head again and again in the discussion, with much of the information on comparative sexual performance based on "self- assessment." Rushton is obviously much taken with the "salience of... buttocks and breasts" (pp. 167, 231) as measures of sexuality, although there is a dearth of objectively collected data.
More telling is his evident fascination with the "Negroid" penis as an index of "potency" and libido. In his earlier publications on these matters, his information came from "self-assessment." --FROM: Review: Racialism and Racist Agendas Author(s): C. Loring Brace Reviewed work(s):Race, Evolution, and Behavior: A Life History Perspective by J. Philippe Rushton Source: American Anthropologist, New Series, Vol. 98, No. 1 (Mar., 1996), pp. 176-177
WHite "biodiversity" scholars protected by university tenure, even as they solicit students to engage in penis size studies of negroid indexes.. Rushton was a tenured professor at UWO in the 1990s.
QUOTE: "In other words, Rushton took advantage of students who didn’t know that in the case of his study they had the option not to participate without incurring additional work. As punishment, the psychology department barred him from using students as research subjects for two years.
The second instance also occurred in 1988. Rushton conducted a survey at the Eaton Centre mall in Toronto, paying 50 whites, 50 blacks, and 50 Asians $5.00 each to answer questions about their sexual habits. For this, he was again formally reprimanded, this time by the University of Western Ontario administration itself, because he had failed to submit the project for approval by the university’s ethics committee, as required for research projects off campus. This was “a serious breach of scholarly procedure,” according to the university’s president, George Pederson. " NY review of Books. 1994 "Pioneer" http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/1995/mar/23/pioneer/
It should be noted that the above racial theories are being advanced by white racial writers who demonize blacks as lesser examples of humanity. Could the obsession with black penis size be related to this savage disparagement of blacks? White writer Michael Bradley suggests that penis envy could be a relevant factor is the hate of white racists for blacks. -------------------------------------------------------
Yet another white writer, M. Bradley, in "The Iceman Inheritance", holds that white evolution in cold climates generated smaller penis sizes, compared to Negroes. This smaller penis size generates intense envy, resentment and rage in some white lineages, leading to murderous violence. Some lynchings in the US South may be related to this white penis envy re Negroid [sic] data..
-------------------------
White racist jealously of black potency has long historical roots scholars suggest, with white obsession so intense that black African penises where sometimes preserved and shipped to Europe as curiosities in colonial times.
QUOTE:
"Some histories suggest that European explorers and slave traders sometines even perserved and pickled the penises of some African males, shipping the back to Europe as curiosities. Typically, the size of the African penis was held up as evidence of the "animalistic" and "subhuman" nature of the black race.
In 1954, in his analysis of the underpinnings of bias and racism, Gordon Allport referenced the preoccupation with sex and the black man's penis, suggesting that it was not the physical size of the penis, but the "psychological" size of the penis that was the fascination and preoccupation. In Calvin Hernton's work Sex and Race in America, Hernton describes the history of Southern white women's preoccupation with black men, suggesting that black males took on an iconic sexual persona." --David J. Ley. 2009. Insatiable wives
E------- longated African at work 1..
Feelings of inadequacy haunt white racists, directly and indirectly, among all white social classes, some white writers suggest..
"There is in the psyche of the racist an inordinate disposition for sexual atrocity. He sees in the Negro the essence of his own sexuality, that is. those qualities that he wishes for but fears he does not possess." --Hernton, Calvin 1965. Sex and Racism in America. Grove Press
"This was particularly salient to me when I gave a lecture on environmental racism before an audience of over 400 of North Carolina's "most gifted" high school seniors.. [who thought blacks lagged in some school academic areas] (except for athletic ability and — as many of my white students routinely point out — penis size).. --White college professor in American Philosophical Association newsletter, Spring 2004, vol 103, no 2
WHite racist envy and resentment re black potency is reflected subtly in several Hollywood horror films quote: "the question of penis size is also part and parcel of racist fears: Kong as black rapist, which tells us far more about the castration fears of white racists than about the real endowments of black males." --Reynold Humphries - 2006 - The Hollywood horror film, 1931-1941: madness in a social landscape
Racist architect of the Holocaust, Adolf Hitler's writings reveal an obsessive fear of negro sexual potency even when railing against Jews.. Quote:
"The myth of the over-sized black penis may be contrasted with the turn-of-the-century antisemitic beeif that the large Jewish nose signified a small penis, further truncated by circumcision. Such images raised questions about Jewish masculinity and virility. But.. [the] notion of the Jew as cunning seducer, and occasionally a violent rapist, was a staple of Nazi propaganda. In his passage warning against 'the black-haired Jewish youth' Hitler also manages to arouse fears of lack sexuality when he blames Jews for the introduction into the Rhineland of soldiers from the French African colonies, some of who had affairs with German women that resulted in children of mixed ancestry.
Hitler even claimed that the French toleration of black-white intermarriage and its seeming color blind conception of assimilation was turning France into' an extension of Africa into the heartland of Europe'.. As for hundreds of mixed offspring sired on German women by French African colonial soldiers in the Rhineland during the early postwar years, they were rounded up and sterilized in 1937.." Had there been a significant black population in Germany, they might have conceivably have been sent to gas chambers along with all the Jews who could be apprehended and some of the Gypsies. Nevertheless, the German fixation on Jews clearly did not depend on large numbers: there were only about 1 percent of the population when Hitler came to power." ---George M. Fredrickson. 2003. Racism: A Short History. Princeton University Press. 120-121
White hereditarian scholars show obsession with black sexual endowment in their research QUOTE: "Another god in the racist pantheon Herrnstein and Murray employ as a source is Philippe Rushton, a Canadian psychologist who has received worldwide attention for his racial theories. Rushton is known particularly for his argument that brain size and penis size are inversely proportional.. To prove his contentions about the races, Rushton has conducted research at shopping malls, where he asks men from different racial groups to specify the distance their semen travels during ejaculation. ." --Joe L. Kincheloe 2009. Measured Lies: The Bell Curve Examined
"The genitalia of black Africans were also deemed noteworthy to the Greek and Roman artists. Within the same art piece, black males are depicted with penises larger than those of white figures, and in others are shown as being erect." --Vincent Sarich, Frank Miele. 2005. Race: The Reality of Human Differences. pg 41
Posts: 5905 | From: The Hammer | Registered: Aug 2008
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Brada-Anansi: Hi TP,for the longest I thought you were a guy,well it's nice to see another beautiful sista holding her own along with T&R,Dena,Arwa and Loc Diva..
lol that's not me. I am a guy. lol
6.3ft., 198pond
Posts: 22234 | From: האם אינכם כילדי הכרית אלי בני ישראל | Registered: Nov 2010
| IP: Logged |
posted
That sure was funny. I'm guessing that the "click me" bit threw Brada off.
-------------------- The Complete Picture of the Past tells Us what Not to Repeat Posts: 7516 | From: Somewhere on Earth | Registered: Jan 2008
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by The Explorer: I guess Mugabe must be "caucasoid", since he lacks the prognathic profile in cassiterrides "idealized" caricatures "diagrams" above.
You need a profile shot to determine prognathism.
Here is a profile shot of Mugabe.
He clearly appears to be prognathic.
Posts: 51 | Registered: Jan 2012
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by cassiterides: This diagram may help -
As you can see the Negroid has a very different facial angulation to the Caucasoid. Secondly you can also see that the prognathism of the Negro prevents a pencil from the nasal spine touching the chin.
This is just my opinion and I really hate giving this thread any kind of attention but this is for the record. The Caucasian used on the Left could have been any various kind of European but rather it was what is defined as the ideal Caucasoid type. So what this comparison does is simply cherry picks what is Caucasian (socially) and then compares that to a skewed view of a Black person. It is with this clever trick they are able to reinforce the innate racial tendencies in their own kind. This is the way propaganda works and it is very effective. Fortunately people aren't as ignorant as they were before and are aware of the diversity of African people to the point that they realize "we don't all look alike" and neither do they.
But you are welcome to use your pencil test on this:
Others have done pencil tests (of a sort) on the Sphinx and agree with you. The pencil test is a good way of clearly identifying the Sphinx as a Negro.
Posts: 4028 | From: NW USA | Registered: May 2005
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Atemu: You need a profile shot to determine prognathism.
Here is a profile shot of Mugabe.
He clearly appears to be prognathic. [/QB]
Yes he is prognathic, especially in the sub-nasal region. If he took the prognathic test with the pencil from the nasal spine, he would have to cut a hole in his lips to get the pencil to reach his chin. In contrast with Caucasoids, the pencil reaches their chin naturally.
Negroids have prognathism. This is an anthropological fact and still recognised by forensic scientists. The only reason some black people deny they have it is out of self-hate. Prognathism is a very ugly feature.
Posts: 2408 | From: My mother's basement | Registered: Dec 2010
| IP: Logged |
Others have done pencil tests (of a sort) on the Sphinx and agree with you. The pencil test is a good way of clearly identifying the Sphinx as a Negro.
The sphinx is badly damaged, there is no way to measure its facial angle, and it has no nose.
No scholar has ever taken the Sphinx = Negro claim seriously.
Posts: 2408 | From: My mother's basement | Registered: Dec 2010
| IP: Logged |
The Alveolar process region of his mouth is similar to that of many Ancient Egyptians; aside from the protrusion of incisors, there is also a relatively greater distance between his nasal aperture and his incisors than in many other populations. You can clearly see the said region isn't extended as much on Ahmedinidjad's face.
Posts: 8785 | From: Discovery Channel's Mythbusters | Registered: Dec 2009
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by osirion: This is just my opinion and I really hate giving this thread any kind of attention but this is for the record. The Caucasian used on the Left could have been any various kind of European but rather it was what is defined as the ideal Caucasoid type. So what this comparison does is simply cherry picks what is Caucasian (socially) and then compares that to a skewed view of a Black person. It is with this clever trick they are able to reinforce the innate racial tendencies in their own kind. This is the way propaganda works and it is very effective. Fortunately people aren't as ignorant as they were before and are aware of the diversity of African people to the point that they realize "we don't all look alike" and neither do they. Fortunately people aren't as ignorant as they were before and are aware of the diversity of African people to the point that they realize "we don't all look alike" and neither do they.
Don't you think excusing their melanophobia is a bit of a stretch? They do know this, they accept it and as far as our concerns go, they just don't care. The caricatural image of black people dates back to thousands of years way before our time. Its not a new or ignorant thing. The difference between then and now is back then they didn't have the power to reinforce their ideals as they do now. What we are witnessing here is the result of ideals developed over a millennium coming into fruition. Have you seen how Cassiterides, Perahu et al of their type represent black people? Are we not to expect those who hold us to hatred and contempt in their eyes and minds to portray us as anything other than grotesque caricatures? What do you think words like true negro/negro, mixed or full blown/pure mean to you? To these people our diversity doesn't matter and most likely it never will.
Posts: 535 | From: From the Darkest of the Abyss | Registered: Apr 2010
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by osirion: This is just my opinion and I really hate giving this thread any kind of attention but this is for the record. The Caucasian used on the Left could have been any various kind of European but rather it was what is defined as the ideal Caucasoid type. So what this comparison does is simply cherry picks what is Caucasian (socially) and then compares that to a skewed view of a Black person. It is with this clever trick they are able to reinforce the innate racial tendencies in their own kind. This is the way propaganda works and it is very effective. Fortunately people aren't as ignorant as they were before and are aware of the diversity of African people to the point that they realize "we don't all look alike" and neither do they. Fortunately people aren't as ignorant as they were before and are aware of the diversity of African people to the point that they realize "we don't all look alike" and neither do they.
Don't you think excusing their melanophobia is a bit of a stretch? They do know this, they accept it and as far as our concerns go, they just don't care. The caricatural image of black people dates back to thousands of years way before our time. Its not a new or ignorant thing. The difference between then and now is back then they didn't have the power to reinforce their ideals as they do now. What we are witnessing here is the result of ideals developed over a millennium coming into fruition. Have you seen how Cassiterides, Perahu et al of their type represent black people? Are we not to expect those who hold us to hatred and contempt in their eyes and minds to portray us as anything other than grotesque caricatures? What do you think words like true negro/negro, mixed or full blown/pure mean to you? To these people our diversity doesn't matter and most likely it never will.
Negroids don't have physical diversity. East Africans are heavily admixed with Eurasian (Caucasoid) genes which gave them a broader scope of physical features (for example thinner noses). But out of self-hate most Negroids deny the Caucasoid origin of these traits.
Posts: 2408 | From: My mother's basement | Registered: Dec 2010
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Atemu: You need a profile shot to determine prognathism.
How about former President, Abdou Diouf:
What about the guy next to him, on the right?
Or Mr. Cheikh Anta Diop:
quote: Here is a profile shot of Mugabe.
He clearly appears to be prognathic.
Yes he is prognathic, especially in the sub-nasal region.
If only mildly.
quote:The only reason some black people deny they have it is out of self-hate.
"Some" blacks must have scientists have their back, if this data is anything to go by. Where did the researchers go wrong here, cassiterrides? Or maybe it's just that these Bantu-speaking individuals have some long lost "caucasoid" lineage?
The type of "non-orthognatic" alveolar-mandibular profile common in African populations appears to be "mesognathism" rather than "prognathism". Of course, orthognatism is also a regular sight in the phenetic index of the continent.
Posts: 7516 | From: Somewhere on Earth | Registered: Jan 2008
| IP: Logged |
posted
How have you determined that Abdou Diouf and the other mentioned are "moderately prognathic" , while the personalities in your image are "orthognatic"?
-------------------- The Complete Picture of the Past tells Us what Not to Repeat Posts: 7516 | From: Somewhere on Earth | Registered: Jan 2008
| IP: Logged |
Others have done pencil tests (of a sort) on the Sphinx and agree with you. The pencil test is a good way of clearly identifying the Sphinx as a Negro.
The sphinx is badly damaged, there is no way to measure its facial angle, and it has no nose.
No scholar has ever taken the Sphinx = Negro claim seriously.
PBS Special - Mystery of the Sphinx. You might want to look at the credentials of those that produced, provided forensic evidence, and helped edit the video.
No scholar? You lose.
But for others. The angle of the face of the Sphinx isn't due to erosion or anything like that. It is was clearly designed with this shape which, unlike other artifacts, is impossible to hide. Eurocentrics simply ignore it but it is not something you can ignore.
The Sphinx stands our as a testament to the Black Heritage of Egypt and there is nothing any Eurocentric can say or do about it because it is simply too large for them to damage enough to hide what is very obvious. They can't plaster or paint over it or do the so called touch ups they have done with many other artifacts.
Eurocentrics love to talk about the facial features of the True Negro but then pretend like the Sphinx doesn't have a Negro face by their own definition.
Don't expect reason from religious fanatics.
Posts: 4028 | From: NW USA | Registered: May 2005
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by osirion: This is just my opinion and I really hate giving this thread any kind of attention but this is for the record. The Caucasian used on the Left could have been any various kind of European but rather it was what is defined as the ideal Caucasoid type. So what this comparison does is simply cherry picks what is Caucasian (socially) and then compares that to a skewed view of a Black person. It is with this clever trick they are able to reinforce the innate racial tendencies in their own kind. This is the way propaganda works and it is very effective. Fortunately people aren't as ignorant as they were before and are aware of the diversity of African people to the point that they realize "we don't all look alike" and neither do they. Fortunately people aren't as ignorant as they were before and are aware of the diversity of African people to the point that they realize "we don't all look alike" and neither do they.
Don't you think excusing their melanophobia is a bit of a stretch? They do know this, they accept it and as far as our concerns go, they just don't care. The caricatural image of black people dates back to thousands of years way before our time. Its not a new or ignorant thing. The difference between then and now is back then they didn't have the power to reinforce their ideals as they do now. What we are witnessing here is the result of ideals developed over a millennium coming into fruition. Have you seen how Cassiterides, Perahu et al of their type represent black people? Are we not to expect those who hold us to hatred and contempt in their eyes and minds to portray us as anything other than grotesque caricatures? What do you think words like true negro/negro, mixed or full blown/pure mean to you? To these people our diversity doesn't matter and most likely it never will.
You have to do what we are doing - educate ourselves and others.
Truth is very effective. People are looking for it and that search takes them to it. We should just make it easier.
Egyptians also had a Self Caricature but what it shows was diversity of a nature that doesn't fit nicely into a fantasy world of oids.
Pencil test shows him to be more Caucasian than the ideal Caucasoid.
You can also do the pencil test on fraudulent bit of work. Even though it is a fraud and intended to be Caucasoid the pencil shows a Negro but the Eurocentric will be in too much denial to accept his own rules.
Here is the more authentic side view of King Tut:
Funny thing is that you really don't need a pencil test to see that this is clearly a Negro. Significantly more so than myself or even the picture of the Black man at the top of this post.
Posts: 4028 | From: NW USA | Registered: May 2005
| IP: Logged |
Fi real...true mi did think seh di mon crawled back up ina fi him madda's condemned hole fe good...but it seems har rotten womb has once again expelled him in its disgust....
Posts: 3446 | From: U.S. by way of JA by way of Africa | Registered: Jan 2010
| IP: Logged |
The man below belongs to one of the oldest branches of mankind, at the Omo Kibish site. So now we can see where certain facial traces come from.
quote:Originally posted by osirion:
quote:Originally posted by Troll Patrol:
Pencil test shows him to be more Caucasian than the ideal Caucasoid.
You can also do the pencil test on fraudulent bit of work. Even though it is a fraud and intended to be Caucasoid the pencil shows a Negro but the Eurocentric will be in too much denial to accept his own rules.
Here is the more authentic side view of King Tut:
Funny thing is that you really don't need a pencil test to see that this is clearly a Negro. Significantly more so than myself or even the picture of the Black man at the top of this post.
Posts: 22234 | From: האם אינכם כילדי הכרית אלי בני ישראל | Registered: Nov 2010
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Atemu: Here are two good examples of orthognathic black Africans (common trait in the Northeast)
Only in the NE because they have Caucasoid admixture.
East Africans are 40% Eurasian (Caucasoid), its why some have inherited a Caucasoid bone morphology.
Posts: 2408 | From: My mother's basement | Registered: Dec 2010
| IP: Logged |
posted
^lol @ the idiot above. It's just unbelievable how stupid this one is.lol
East Africans, like other Africans are tropical adapted and have no body hair.lol
This dumb nazi chickensh*t doesn't understand that its not overall in the population, but only goes for some occurrences in some regions. This admixture is also from during the Axum and Islamic expansion.
How about that one. Self proclaim pseudo anthropologist.
Posts: 22234 | From: האם אינכם כילדי הכרית אלי בני ישראל | Registered: Nov 2010
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Atemu: Here are two good examples of orthognathic black Africans (common trait in the Northeast)
Only in the NE because they have Caucasoid admixture.
East Africans are 40% Eurasian (Caucasoid), its why some have inherited a Caucasoid bone morphology.
Prove that level of admixture among East Africans please. No, don't say bone morphology I mean actually show me something that says their DNA places about half their heritage in Eurasia. The Amarna mummies sure as hell do not cluster closer to Eurasia which they would if they were 'mulattoes'
Posts: 26 | Registered: Dec 2011
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Atemu: Here are two good examples of orthognathic black Africans (common trait in the Northeast)
Only in the NE because they have Caucasoid admixture.
East Africans are 40% Eurasian (Caucasoid), its why some have inherited a Caucasoid bone morphology.
No, a technological leap in the Eburran culture led to a change in diet. That leap was the harpoon used for fishing. Fish meat changed the diet of the proto-Cushitic people in Aksum resulting in a change in morphology. This is why we see phonetype diversification occurring thousands of years before the Sabean back migration into Aksum. Your erroneously dubbed Caucasoid features were already in East Africa before Eurasians back migrated. Eurasian back migration is very recent.
Posts: 4028 | From: NW USA | Registered: May 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
The real reason for Zaharans self-hatred, insecurity and envy of white males -
White Man has the largest penis in the world:
Jonah Falcon "In early 2006, he appeared in a documentary by UK Channel 4 called "The World's Biggest Penis."[4] His large size also led him to several appearances on the Howard Stern radio program.[2]
Rolling Stone reports Falcon's penis as 9.5 inches (24 cm) in length when flaccid and 13.5 inches (34 cm) in length when erect.[1]"
Posts: 2408 | From: My mother's basement | Registered: Dec 2010
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Atemu: Here are two good examples of orthognathic black Africans (common trait in the Northeast)
Only in the NE because they have Caucasoid admixture.
East Africans are 40% Eurasian (Caucasoid), its why some have inherited a Caucasoid bone morphology.
Prove that level of admixture among East Africans please. No, don't say bone morphology I mean actually show me something that says their DNA places about half their heritage in Eurasia. The Amarna mummies sure as hell do not cluster closer to Eurasia which they would if they were 'mulattoes'
The genetics again and again has confirmed that East Africans are an ''intermediate'' race between Negroid and Caucasoid. They are Aethiopid (40% Caucasoid).
quote:Originally posted by cassiterides: The real reason for Zaharans self-hatred, insecurity and envy of white males -
White Man has the largest penis in the world:
Jonah Falcon "In early 2006, he appeared in a documentary by UK Channel 4 called "The World's Biggest Penis."[4] His large size also led him to several appearances on the Howard Stern radio program.[2]
Rolling Stone reports Falcon's penis as 9.5 inches (24 cm) in length when flaccid and 13.5 inches (34 cm) in length when erect.[1]"
lol this is another hilarious outburst.
Posts: 22234 | From: האם אינכם כילדי הכרית אלי בני ישראל | Registered: Nov 2010
| IP: Logged |