posted
I'm more interested in the earlier classical descriptions of peoples from the Maghreb, none of whom are described as black. Even the northern interior tribes like the Garamantes are not (see Snowden) called aethiopes (burnt faced) because they had lighter shades of brown skin. It was only some nomadic tribes at the southern fringes of Libya (parallel to Nubia) that were called aethiopes.
Posts: 949 | From: England | Registered: Oct 2015
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Diebythesword: I'm more interested in the earlier classical descriptions of peoples from the Maghreb, none of whom are described as black. Even the northern interior tribes like the Garamantes are not (see Snowden) called aethiopes (burnt faced) because they had lighter shades of brown skin. It was only some nomadic tribes at the southern fringes of Libya (parallel to Nubia) that were called aethiopes.
You really must try to keep up.
The nonsense of Albino Greeks ruling and Aegypt meaning "Burnt Face" has long ago been debunked.
The culprit is Albino TRANSLATORS of ancient texts - THEY LIE!
Please read the section on "Burnt Face" on this page, it also debunks many Albino lies of this type.
posted
everyone lies except the Afrocentrist. Right, Mike?
quote:Originally posted by Mike111:
quote:Originally posted by Diebythesword: I'm more interested in the earlier classical descriptions of peoples from the Maghreb, none of whom are described as black. Even the northern interior tribes like the Garamantes are not (see Snowden) called aethiopes (burnt faced) because they had lighter shades of brown skin. It was only some nomadic tribes at the southern fringes of Libya (parallel to Nubia) that were called aethiopes.
You really must try to keep up.
The nonsense of Albino Greeks ruling and Aegypt meaning "Burnt Face" has long ago been debunked.
The culprit is Albino TRANSLATORS of ancient texts - THEY LIE!
Please read the section on "Burnt Face" on this page, it also debunks many Albino lies of this type.
quote:Originally posted by Real tawk: everyone lies except the Afrocentrist. Right, Mike?
. Albinos lie purposely for nefarious purposes, whereas Afrocentrics lie by accident, or out of ordinary ignorance. See my new thread.
Posts: 22721 | Registered: Oct 2005
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Real tawk: everyone lies except the Afrocentrist. Right, Mike?
quote:Originally posted by Mike111:
quote:Originally posted by Diebythesword: I'm more interested in the earlier classical descriptions of peoples from the Maghreb, none of whom are described as black. Even the northern interior tribes like the Garamantes are not (see Snowden) called aethiopes (burnt faced) because they had lighter shades of brown skin. It was only some nomadic tribes at the southern fringes of Libya (parallel to Nubia) that were called aethiopes.
You really must try to keep up.
The nonsense of Albino Greeks ruling and Aegypt meaning "Burnt Face" has long ago been debunked.
The culprit is Albino TRANSLATORS of ancient texts - THEY LIE!
Please read the section on "Burnt Face" on this page, it also debunks many Albino lies of this type.
"Afrocentrist" is a baby forfeit term, its pretty much a projection of what Albinos do. If you accuse the other person of what you are actually doing, no one will think to criticize you. This is more effective when you have brainwashed the masses into thinking you are the authority in academia.
Actually, I've never seen it used honestly, its used as described above. The last time I read of an Albino using "Afrocentrist" it was in a book which I can not recall its title or main content (fairly recent, though I'd say most of their books past the 1900s is of little value). He was upset as he was commenting on some lie that he had supported, so diverted off into potshots. He made a reference to a man (to descredit the boogey man Afrocentrist) and I followed the origin of the reference and found out he was still lying and twisting the source.
So really "Afrocentrist" isnt a word created to be critical, but they are throwing the dice that their engagers are still just stupid enough to see them as the sources of approval, not just over blacks, but also over the primary sources themselves.
Posts: 310 | From: US | Registered: Jun 2015
| IP: Logged |
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
Printer-friendly view of this topic