...
EgyptSearch Forums Post New Topic  Post A Reply
my profile | directory login | register | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» EgyptSearch Forums » Deshret » The Supreme Court striking down a law banning “dictionary-defined racial slurs.”

 - UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!    
Author Topic: The Supreme Court striking down a law banning “dictionary-defined racial slurs.”
Narmerthoth
Member
Member # 20259

Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Narmerthoth     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
THE IRONY!

The Supreme Court Just Made A Washington ‘Redskins’ Name Change Much Less Likely

The NFL franchise in Washington, D.C., received a major boost in its fight to save its controversial “Redskins” name Monday morning, thanks to a Supreme Court ruling in a separate legal dispute.

At issue is the team’s federal trademark protections for the nickname, which Native American activists have described as a “dictionary-defined racial slur.” The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office’s Trademark Trial and Appeal Board invalidated those trademark protections in 2014, ruling that the name was “disparaging to Native Americans” and thus violated a clause in a federal trademark law.

The ruling is another major setback for Native Americans who have fought to change the team’s name for nearly 50 years. After years of protesting and asking the team’s owners to change the name, the activists began targeting the trademark protections in 1992, under the view that the anti-disparagement clause provided a leverage point against the nickname.

The Supreme Court, however, struck down that clause Monday, ruling that the law’s prohibition on providing federal trademarks for disparaging terms or logos violated the First Amendment’s free speech protections.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/washington-football-team-name_us_5947dc11e4b06bb7d274accc?0g9&ncid=inblnkushpmg00000009

--------------------
Selenium gives real life and true reality

Posts: 4693 | From: Saturn | Registered: Apr 2012  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
lamin
Member
Member # 5777

Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for lamin     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Is it that colonialism by Europeans renders local peoples psychologically paralyzed. The Native Americans have inherited a set of nations within the continental U.S. The Navajo nation is more than 3 times the size of Israel and should be the basis for an independent nation with the promise of being an industrial power like Taiwan, Hong Kong, Malaysia or Singapore. The question--applicable to all peoples impacted on by Europeans--is why aren't they more proactive--in terms of modernization?

"Red Skin" signifies only the color of the skin the European settlers saw the locals as having. Is that any different from calling someone "black" or "white"? Somehow "yellow" has not stuck on the people of China--except in the derogatory phrase "yellow peril".

Point being that "let the liberal whites argue over terms like 'Redskins'". More important business to settle.

Posts: 5492 | Registered: Nov 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
   

Quick Reply
Message:

HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.

Instant Graemlins
   


Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


Contact Us | EgyptSearch!

(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com

Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3