posted
Mena7: I think the movie Planet of the Apes symbolizes the ancient Black European royalty and nobility that were ruling the white European masses and serfs. I remember EgyptSearch Forum researcher Edmund Codfried saying that the ancient European Black monarchs and nobility were portrayed as monkeys in many paintings and they were nicknamed monkeys by the masses because of their Black phenotype. Egmund Codfried also stated That the European Balck royalty and nobility used to wear white shoes made of the White masses skin.
The story of the movie Planet of the Apes is an American scientist traveled to another planet and discovered that human were savages and the civilized Apes were enslaving the humans. The American scientist discovered that humans used to be the civilized ruler of the planets and the Apes use to be the slaves, but the humans lost their power to the Apes.
According to symbologist Bobby Hemmitt, the movie Planet of the Apes is the story of the Black race who use to rule the planet, dominated and enslaved the White race. Today the White race represented by the Apes in the movie had enslaved and rules over the Black race
The novel is a satire that follows French journalist Ulysse Mérou, who participates in a voyage to a distant planet where speechless, animalistic humans are hunted and enslaved by an advanced society of apes. The ape species are sorted into classes: the gorillas are police officers, the chimpanzees are scientists, and the orangutans are politicians. Eventually, Mérou discovers that humans once dominated the planet until their complacency allowed the more industrious apes to overthrow them. The story's central message is that human intelligence is not a fixed quality and could atrophy if taken for granted.[1][2] Boulle considered the novel one of his minor works, though it proved to be a bestseller. British author Xan Fielding translated it into English; it was published in the United Kingdom as Monkey Planet and in the United States as Planet of the Apes.[
posted
Why is the connection made with Black people and not with Asians?
Posts: 22234 | From: האם אינכם כילדי הכרית אלי בני ישראל | Registered: Nov 2010
| IP: Logged |
Tukuler
multidisciplinary Black Scholar
Member # 19944
posted
at the time it came out teacher told us it was laying out for us who's our primate ancestors
blx go-rilla ytz chimp ylw rang a tang
the old barb derived in fun of darwin
his gen ached so from the 'monkey' taunt he nixed us kids plan for the class trip
=-=-=
As an adult I found a stunning accurate monologue 'scripture' by an orangutan (ylw - intelligentsia caste) denouncing NW Euro worldwide civilization in terms preceding Bradley's Iceman Inheritance by decades.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y8htpob_WU0 “Beware the beast Man, for he is the Devil’s pawn. Alone among God’s primates, he kills for sport or lust or greed. Yea, he will murder his brother to possess his brother’s land. Let him not breed in great numbers, for he will make a desert of his home and yours. Shun him; drive him back into his jungle lair, for he is the harbinger of death.”
— The Lawgiver
=-=-=
There was a real Battle for the Planet of the Apes. Between the Naked Apes. Us and the other homo species alive when we were. The battle was to thrive on this planet. None the others even survived (far as we know). We won! Enjoy these vids
BBC Homo Erectus - Planet of the Apemen: Battle for Earth This episode is set 75,000 years ago in India, following a catastrophic super-volcanic eruption which forced a showdown between our ancestors and a completely different species of human, Homo erectus, who up until that point had reigned supreme. Homo erectus was a successful, long-lived species that migrated out of Africa. Possibly the first humans to live in hunter-gatherer societies, they also used rafts to travel the oceans. BBC Neanderthal - Planet of the Apemen: Battle for Earth This episode is set 35,000 years ago and depicts Homo sapiens's encounter with Homo neanderthalensis. As the ice caps retreated, the Neanderthal stronghold in Europe weakened, providing a window of opportunity to which modern humans owe their existence. As almost exclusively carnivorous, both male and female Neanderthals hunted. Evidence of a huge number of injuries, like those seen in today's rodeo riders, suggest that hunting involved dangerously close contact with large prey animals.
Mena: I think the movie King Kong symbolizes the Black European kings mixing with white women to have light skin children or the Black European kidnapping White womwn to hhave sex. I know it sound crazy but Hollywood movie directors are great symbologists. This is my speculation.
King Kong can also be call King Kongo. The word Kongo probably gave us the words king, kingdom, Hong Kong, Viet Cong, Chi Kung, Kung Fu, Kung Fu Tzu, konga etc.
posted
That isn't it,there are depiction of African looking people going back to Greece,also you have some Europeans describing some ancient Europeans with negro phenotype. That's not including contemporary populations with a Africoid look,so what happened to those African like groups in Europe?
Posts: 1123 | From: New York | Registered: Feb 2016
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Thereal: That isn't it,there are depiction of African looking people going back to Greece,also you have some Europeans describing some ancient Europeans with negro phenotype. That's not including contemporary populations with a Africoid look,so what happened to those African like groups in Europe?
Depictions are always tricky. Some people even think that some Olmec, Amerindian statues depict black "negroid" people, even if there are no evidence whatsoever that the Olmecs where black, and even if many Amerindians actually look like those statues. People see what they want to see, if you want to see "Africoid" looks in old depictions you will see it. If you want to see Caucasoid in for example ancient Egyptian pictures you will also see it. Obviously such things are important for some people who are fixated with the concept of race.
Often it is not professional historians or archaeologists that make such racial claims.
-------------------- Once an archaeologist, always an archaeologist Posts: 2685 | From: Sweden | Registered: Mar 2020
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Thereal: That isn't it,there are depiction of African looking people going back to Greece,also you have some Europeans describing some ancient Europeans with negro phenotype. That's not including contemporary populations with a Africoid look,so what happened to those African like groups in Europe?
Depictions are always tricky. Some people even think that some Olmec, Amerindian statues depict black "negroid" people, even if there are no evidence whatsoever that the Olmecs where black, and even if many Amerindians actually look like those statues. People see what they want to see, if you want to see "Africoid" looks in old depictions you will see it. If you want to see Caucasoid in for example ancient Egyptian pictures you will also see it. Obviously such things are important for some people who are fixated with the concept of race.
Often it is not professional historians or archaeologists that make such racial claims.
Because archaeologists and anthropologist have made those connections based on peer reviewed work, that this phenotype is the oldest amongst mankind. And now with the human genome, it's being confirmed once more.
Posts: 22234 | From: האם אינכם כילדי הכרית אלי בני ישראל | Registered: Nov 2010
| IP: Logged |
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
Printer-friendly view of this topic