What is the origin of racism? Where did it come from? And why? Why is racism based upon skin color and facial features as oppose to height and shoe size? Of course, there were conflicts against people with dark-skin, but they were no different than conflicts between "white" against "white." Brahmin Caste System in India One of the earliest examples, which still exist today, is the caste system practice in India since c. 1500 BC. The caste system is embedded into the Hindu religion in which fair-skinned Brahmins rule over the dark-skinned population -- which in itself is divided into lower hierarchial classes with Dalits on the bottom. For further study read:The Bible of Aryan Invasions: Aryan Invasions of Negroes, Semites & Mongols--by Prof. Uthaya Naidu
The Brahmin caste system is so extreme that the very sight or touch of some groups (‘untouchables’) by other "higher ordered" groups was pollution. Domination is sustained through the 4 tiered castes which are based upon upon birth and ethnicity, with Brahmins at the top and other allied ethnic groups in decending order of value down to the "untouchable" Dalits. The Dalit's culture is viewed as inferior to other various hindu castes. As Brahmin culture permeated throughout the Indian sub-continent, the oppressed population worshipped brahmical religious gods in addition to their own gods even though they were forbidden to enter hindu temples. They began to accept hindu philosophy and changed their own worldview ways of thinking. To some extent, untouchables began to view themselves as inferior to hindus and perpetuate hindu casteism and sexism in their own community and family institutions.
Ancient Egyptians were well aware of the physical variations of humans. Yet, they distinguished groups according to ethnicities. ( For example, the Nubians who resided in the southern regions of the Nile, dark-skinned Africans, but not a race in modern sense.) Though indicates the possibility Egytians often murdered red-headed people who regarded in their culture as symbols of evil (see the Egyptian god, Seth) whenever they encouneted them.
However, according to Jean-François Champollion the Younger, in his 13th letter to his brother, remarking (about certain bas-reliefs he had seen in various tombs):
"According to the legend...they wished to represent the inhabitants of Egypt and those of foreign lands. Thus we have before our eyes the image of the various races of man known to the Egyptians... the last one is what we call flesh-colored, a white skin of the most delicate shade, a nose straight or slightly arched, blue eyes, blond or reddish beard, tall stature and very slender, clad in a hairy ox-skin, a veritable savage... he is called Tamhou.... I certainly did not expect, on arriving at Biban-el-Moluk, to find sculptures that could serve as vignettes of the history of the primitive Europeans, if ever one has the courage to attempt it. Nevertheless, there is something flattering and consoling in seeing them, since they make us appreciate the progress we have subsequently achieved."
Ancient Greece and Rome
As did the Ancient Egyptians, Ancient Greeks also recognized physical differences in peoples.
-Herodotus (484 - 425 B.C.) sees the differences in human phenotype as a result of adaptation to differing environments.
History clearly reveals Herodotus labelng black-skinned people as "Aethiopian" or "Ethiopian", which means "burnt-faced" in Greek. He often made of descriptions about other peoples as in the case with the Colchis:
"There can be no doubt that the Colchians are an Egyptian race. Before I heard any mention of the fact from others, I had remarked it myself. After the thought had struck me, I made inquiries on the subject both in Colchis and in Egypt, and I found that the Colchians had a more distinct recollection of the Egyptians, than the Egyptians had of them. Still the Egyptians said that they believed the Colchians to be descended from the army of Sesostris. My own conjectures were founded, first, on the fact that they are black-skinned and have woolly hair, which certainly amounts to but little, since several other nations are so too; but further and more especially, on the circumstance that the Colchians, the Egyptians, and the Ethiopians, are the only nations who have practised circumcision from the earliest times. The Phoenicians and the Syrians of Palestine themselves confess that they learnt the custom of the Egyptians..."
[Herodotus, Book 3]
-Aristotle (384-322 B.C.): "Historia Animalium" describes similarities between man, apes, and monkeys, as related to the great chain of being. Like Herodotus, Aristotle argued for environmental causes of variation. For example, he concluded that the hot, dry climate caused the hair of Aethiopians (Africans) to be wooly, while the moist air climate caused the hair of to be straight.
Generally, The word 'barbarian' stems from the Greek, meaning 'non-Greek', not participating in the enlightenment and refinement of Greek culture. They likely did so in order to describe the sounds they made-- bar-bar-bar-bar... In this case, this would be the early European tribes in the north and the Garamantes (Berber?) in northern Africa.
However, Greeks held a very unfavorable view of their northern neighbors. According to Greek culturral historians and later the Romans:
"Barbarians can neither think nor act rationally, theological controversies are Greek to them... Under the assault of their horrible songs the classic meter of the ancient poet goes to pieces...Barbarians are driven by evil spirits; "possessed by demons", who force them to commit the most terrible acts...incapable of living according to written laws and only reluctantly tolerating kings...Their lust for gold is immense, their love of drink boundless. Barbarians are without restraint...Although generally they are considered good-looking, they are given to gross personal hygiene...They run dirty and barefoot, even in the winter...They grease their blond hair with butter and care not that it smells rancid...Their reproductive energy is inexhaustible; the Northern climate of their native land, with its long winter nights favors their fantastic urge to procreate...If a barbarian people is driven back or destroyed, another already emerges from the marshes and forests of Germany...Indeed, there are no new barbarian peoples--descendents of the same tribes keep appearing." (Herwig Wolfram, The History of the Goths, p. 6-7).
One Roman writer in his work described early northern Europeans as warlike:
"A constant preoccupation was the menace of the barbarians, who consisted of many warlike races, not ashamed to live by plunder. The area of Roman influence reached to the Danube, which was a useful natural defence. When the river froze in winter, however, invasion could be expected. Mounted bowmen using poisoned arrows came and devastated the land, plundering the meagre wealth of the peasants, setting fire to their huts and then taking into captivity those they had not killed. The fear of such raids was constant, and they came suddenly like great flocks of birds." [Ovid in Exile: Barbarians]
Keep in mind it was the barbarian tribes who rained from the north to destroy the Roman empire. Thus, the modern term for barbarian holds a negative connotation pointing to destructive behavior.
Early "Renaissance"
Prior to the Reformation and age of Enlightment, the division of humankind was marked by ethnic descent. Such divisions were actually more religious than racial. There periods of religous wars persecutions as in the case of the Crusades. The Christians were Anti-Muslim nnd continue to be so til this day. In particular, the Crusades set a precedent for the mass murder of Jews in western German towns in 1196 AD. (See Jewish Trouble History Timeline for more information.) The Spanish Inquisition was a major event in which many lives were lost due to religious beliefs.
The early church doctrines proposed human unity regardless of skin color. But most of all, it was possible for blacks to reach sainthood in the Catholic Church (ie. St. Benedict the Moor). There were even imges of the Virgin Mary being represented in the form of the Black Madonna. But what went wrong?????
-1441Prince Henry the Navigator of Portugal, explores the coat of West Africa and finds black people accustomed to working in the tropical climates.
-1442 The first African captives are brought to Lisbon as slaves.
-1492 Christopher Columbus bumps into America with Alonzo Pietro, known as “il Negro,” as his navigator. African servants, slaves, and explorers come to the “New World” with the first Spanish and French explorers. Pedro Niño of Columbus’ crew is identified as black by some scholars. Keep in mind this all takes place the same year that the Moors were driven out of Spain. Thousands of Moorish slaves left behind as prisons of war
-1493 Columbus' second voyage.
-1498 Columbus' third voyage to America. Spanish government allows Columbus to take convicted robbers and murderers on this voyage. In the New World they are granted large freeholds and permitted to treat all non–white Christians as chattel and beasts.
-1502 The first Africans are brought as laborers to the West Indies from Spain where considerable numbers had been employed for some time before.
Queen Isabella commissions Ovando to take Africans “born in the power of Christians” to West Indies, but prohibits him from taking Jews and Moors (Moslems). In 1503 Ovando protests against this prohibition since imported Africans either run away or help to “demoralize” the Amerindians.
-1513 Trans-Atlantic Slave Trade begins
-1516 Friar Bartolomé de las Casas suggested substituting the use of Africans for Indians as slave.
-1543 Martin Luther (1483-1546) sets the stage for anti-Semitism in the Protestant sector of Christianity. In "The Jews and their Lies", Luther made this remark concerning the Jews:
"They hold we Christians captive in our own land. They have seized our goods by their cursed usury, they mock and insult us because we work. They are our lords, and we and our goods belong to them."
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Transition from medieval to modern philosophy in which Europe began to interpret nature based upon what was written in the Bible. Europeans began to recognize differences in humans during their initial voyages and explorations to other places around the world.
-1555 Juan Gines De Sepulveda argued the superiority of the Spaniard to the indigenous people in America:
"In wisdom, skill, virtue and humanity, these people are as inferior to the Spaniards as children are to adults and women to men; there is a great a difference between savagery and forebearance, between violence and moderation, almost -- I am inclined to say -- as between monkeys and men."
-1588 Queen Elizabeth I (1533-1603), Jumps on the West African trade bandwagon.