Maybe some of you have read it already, but I ask if you haven't to please take the time to read it all and give your personal opinion on it. To me, this is the most in-depth look into the connection between the Israelites and Egypt.
Posts: 1219 | From: North Carolina, USA | Registered: Jul 2004
| IP: Logged |
Sounds like David Rohl's theories. I agree through that the chronology of ancient Egypt is rather guess work,but i am skeptical that the Asiatic captives can be connected to ancient Hebrews.
Posts: 8675 | From: Tukuler al~Takruri as Ardo since OCT2014 | Registered: Feb 2003
| IP: Logged |
Sounds like David Rohl's theories. I agree through that the chronology of ancient Egypt is rather guess work,but i am skeptical that the Asiatic captives can be connected to ancient Hebrews.
You read it that fast...wow!
Who's David Rohl?
Posts: 1219 | From: North Carolina, USA | Registered: Jul 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
No, because it believes in the ''Dyanstic Race theory''. He believes that invaders from Western Asian founded Egyptian civlization. This view has largely been discredited.
You can still read it but don't expect mainstream Egyptology though from it.
[This message has been edited by ausar (edited 12 October 2005).]
Posts: 8675 | From: Tukuler al~Takruri as Ardo since OCT2014 | Registered: Feb 2003
| IP: Logged |