The few discussions by academia label it as a "satyre papyrus)..others state that it was what on the mind of the simple folks(?!)...
I would like to know if a serious translations wass made of ALL this papyrus and not just comments on the erotic vignettes and elaborating "jungian/freudian" theories from the drawings..
Some alternative researcher like Tarek Abdel Moty did state that the Remsesses where not true Egyptians but of Syrian descent.
It could explain this anomaly,re sort of imported pornography..
This Papyrus seems to be the only one of its kind ,thus...
Posts: 305 | Registered: May 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
^^Of course such depictions are unrealistic in that there is NO WAY the mens' penises can be that long and big (even for black men)! LOL
And in the last picture, is that a drink the guy is putting on her butt?! And the picture before that, is that woman straddling a pyramid while putting her make-up on?!!
And I thought the Greeks were wild.
Posts: 26238 | From: Atlanta, Georgia, USA | Registered: Feb 2005
| IP: Logged |
-------------------- "Oh the sons of Ethiopia; observe with care; the country called Ethiopia is, first, your mother; second, your throne; third, your wife; fourth, your child; fifth, your grave." - Ras Alula Aba Nega. Posts: 1024 | Registered: Jun 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
The real photos of the drawings convey a better sense-as the computer enhanced images put out the porn aspect of it in lieu of the painting per see..
posted
I have read the original French version of the said book a while back. I'll try to get it back next. This is where the pics Djehuti posted are taken from. Here are pics of fragments of the original papyrus: http://www.bubastis.be/art/musee/turin_08.html
-------------------- Federico Da Montefeltro Posts: 203 | Registered: Dec 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
wow this is so interesting is all new are they ancient papyrus,really this is good to read on ,but the second pic i just cannot believe cud egyptians exstend there manhood that is so so long or where they wishing..
Posts: 354 | From: deputydawgland | Registered: Jun 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
The originals look nothing like the reconstruction and the funny thing is that the reconstruction looks MORE Egyptian than the original. The figures on the original look more asiatic than Egyptian to me. Must have been made extremely late in the Ramessid period.
Posts: 8889 | Registered: May 2005
| IP: Logged |