...
EgyptSearch Forums Post New Topic  New Poll  Post A Reply
my profile | directory login | register | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» EgyptSearch Forums » Egyptology » Egyptian abstract time

 - UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!    
Author Topic: Egyptian abstract time
Elijah The Tishbite
Member
Member # 10328

Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Elijah The Tishbite     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
At the Origin of the Egyptian Civilisation: Reconsidering the Relationship between Egypt and Nubia in the Pre- and Protodynastic Periods

Maria Carmela GATTO (British Museum, London)

The relationship between Egypt and Nubia
during the period preceding the formation of
the Egyptian state has been discussed on many
occasions, particularly as far as the A-Group and
Naqada cultures are concerned (Reisner 1910;
Williams 1986; Smith 1990).


From the start, the cultural prominence of
Egypt over the land of Nubia was postulated. All of the prehistoric evidence found at the beginning of the last century during the first Salvage Campaign related to the construction of the Aswan Dam, was interpreted and described by Reisner as Egyptian. But soon after, a real Nubian culture, similar, but at
the same time different from Egypt's, was recorded and defined. Of course, any similarities were still interpreted as being cultural influences from Egypt, as the Nubians were thought to be incapable of
reaching a high cultural standard without Egypt's
"assistance".
During the last few decades, following
the publication of the A-Group royal cemetery
at Qustul, a Nubian origin of the Pharaohs was
proposed. In fact, the Nubian kings at Qustul
were represented with the same iconography as the
Egyptian kings from Upper Egypt. According to
Williams' chronological interpretation, the Nubian
pharaohs had to be dated right before the first
known kings of Egypt. For the first time, a different
trajectory in the cultural influences between
the two regions was taken into consideration, not
without criticism.
According to current knowledge, there
is a geographical, cultural and political boundary
between Egypt and Nubia, and it is located between
Gebel es Silsila and Aswan. Any Egyptian evidence
in Nubia was seen as an import or as cultural
influence, while any Nubian evidence in Upper
Egypt was viewed as the sporadic presence of
foreign people within Egyptian territory.
In the last few years, new research on the
subject, particularly from a Nubian point of view,
shows that the interaction between the two cultures
was much more complex than previously thought,
affecting the time, space and nature of the interaction
(Gatto & Tiraterra 1996; Gatto 2000, 2003a,
2003b). The Aswan area was probably never a real
borderline, at least not until the New Kingdom. Of
particular importance in this perspective is the area
between Armant and Dehmit, south of the First
Cataract, as well as the surrounding deserts, and
for the availability of data, more specifically the
Western Desert.
The data recently collected and a new
interpretation of available information are bringing
to light a stable and long-term interaction between Upper Egypt and Lower Nubia that has to be seen
in a very different perspective. The two regions,
and so their cultural entities, are not in antithesis
to one another, but in the Predynastic period are
still the expression of the same cultural tradition,
with strong regional variations, particularly in the
last part of the 4th millennium BC. Some of them
are clearly connected with the major cultural and
political changes of Egypt.
This paper aims to revise and better highlight
the nature of this relationship, starting from
the 5th millennium BC, by pointing out the mutual
influences, including the ideological ones, which in
some cases became the base of important aspects
of the rising Egyptian civilisation.
Bibliography
GATTO, M.C., 2000.
The most ancient Evidence of the "A-Groups" Culture
in Lower Nubia. [in:] KRZYZANIAK, L.; KROEPER,
K. & KOBUSIEWICZ, M. (eds.), Recent Research into the
Stone Age of Northeastern Africa. Poznan: 105-117.
GATTO, M.C., 2003A.
Hunting the Elusive Nubian A-Group. Nekhen News 15:
14-15.
GATTO, M.C., 2003B.
The Early A-Group in upper Lower Nubia, Upper Egypt and
surrounding deserts. Paper presented at the VIIe Poznan
Symposium, "Archaeology of the Earliest Northeastern
Africa", 14-18 July 2003, Poznan.
GATTO, M.C. & TIRATERRA, F., 1996.
Contacts between the Nubian "A-Groups" and
Predynastic Egypt [in:] KRZY?ANIAK, L.; KROEPER,
K. & KOBUSIEWICZ, M. (eds.), Interregional Contacts in
the Later Prehistory of Northern Africa. Poznan : 331-334.
REISNER, G.A., 1910.
The Archaeological Survey of Nubia: Report for 1907-1908.
Cairo.
SMITH, H.S., 1991.
The Development of the 'A-Group' Culture in Northern
Lower Nubia [in:] DAVIES, W.V. (ed.), Egypt and Africa.
Nubia from Prehistory to Islam. London: 92-111.
WILLIAMS, B.B., 1986.
Excavations between Abu Simbel and the Sudan Frontier,
Keith C. Seele, Director. Part 1: The A-Group Royal
Cemetery at Qustul: Cemetery L. Oriental Institute Nubian
Expedition 3. Chicago.

Posts: 2595 | From: Vicksburg | Registered: Feb 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Elijah The Tishbite
Member
Member # 10328

Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Elijah The Tishbite     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Study of Gm Immunoglobulin Allotypes in Berbers from Egypt (Siwa Oasis)
Clotilde COUDRAY (Centre d'anthropologie, UMR 8555, Toulouse), Evelyne GUITARD (Centre d'anthropologie,
UMR 8555, Toulouse), Farha EL-CHENNAWI (University of Mansura, Mansura) & Jean-Michel
DUGOUJON (Centre d'anthropologie, UMR 8555, Toulouse)


Siwa Oasis is located in western Egypt,
300km from the Mediterranean coast and 25km
from the Libyan border. Its population, now estimated at more than 15,000 people, speaks Siwi, a particular dialect related to Berber language. This Oasis had been inhabited since the end of the Upper Palaeolithic (Fakhry 1973). The first Berbers would have come from the East (colonisation by Egyptian Proto-Mediterraneans going to the Maghreb) or from the West (secondary migration of Berbers from the Maghreb towards Egypt). Archaeological records attest a first occupation of the Oasis at around 6700 to 8800 years BC (Hassan 1978) with a "libyco-capsian" lithic industry. The
historical period is then marked by successive invasions (Libyans, Persians, Arabs...) then Siwa Oasis
knows a period of decline between the 9th and the
12th centuries AD because of Bedouin assaults. It
is only in the 13th century AD that it again becomes
a stage for the commercial caravans crossing the
Nile Valley desert to join the Mediterranean ports
of Libya, but it becomes also a market of slaves
from the Sahelian areas.
We study the Siwan population within the
framework of a CNRS ("Origine de l'Homme,
du Langage et des Langues") and EUROCORES
("Origin of Man, Language and Languages") project,
having the aim of characterising the genetic
and linguistic relationships between North-African
Berbers. These populations are divided into small
communities scattered across nine African countries:
Morocco, Algeria, Tunisia, Libya, Egypt (Siwa
Oasis), Mauritania, Niger, Mali and Burkina-Faso.
They are linguistically related to the Afro-Asiatic
phylum. The Siwi population is particularly interesting
because, on the one hand, it is located in the
most Eastern part of the geographical Berber areas
and, on the other hand, its inhabitants always tried
to preserve their culture and their identity in spite
of successive invasions. Our study will thus make
it possible to measure both the cultural and genetic
impacts of invaders on the autochthonous population
of the Oasis.
In the OHLL/OMLL project, the anthropogenetic
characterisation of Berber populations is
established with various markers: immunoglobulin
allotypes (Dugoujon et al. 2004; Coudray et al. 2004),
mitochondrial DNA (Fadhlaoui-Zid et al. 2004), Y
chromosome (Arredi et al. 2004), microsatellites
(Bosch et al. 2000), Alu sequences (Gonzalez-Pérez
et al. 2003).
For this work, we consider the occurrence
of antigenic markers on immunoglobulin polypeptide
chains called Ig allotypes. Four allotypic systems are described according to immunoglobulin classes
or chain types but we only investigate the most
useful system in characterising human groups: Gm
system. Gm antigenic determinants are present on
heavy chains of 3 of the 4 subclasses of IgG (IgG1,
IgG2 and IgG3) (Lefranc & Lefranc 1990). Their
polymorphism is determined by the primary structure
of constant regions and reflects differences in
amino acid substitutions on the Ig sequence. The
Gm system is composed of 18 allotypes forming
particular combinations called haplotypes. The
qualitative and quantitative differences between the
15 defined Gm haplotypes are an excellent means
for comparing human populations (genetic structure,
degree of admixture, gene flow, migration
and evolutionary history) (Cavalli-Sforza et al. 1994,
Dugoujon et al. 2004) and make it possible to define
the three great groups: "European", "sub-Saharan"
and "Asian" haplotypes.
One hundred and eighty samples were
tested for G1m(1,2,3,17), G2m(23), and G3m(5,6,1
0,11,13,14,15,16,21,24,28) allotypes by using a classical
haemagglutination inhibition method (Field
& Dugoujon 1989). The results show that Siwan
Berbers are composed of more than 45% of Gm
haplotypes common in European populations and
of more than 50% of "sub-Saharan" haplotypes.
These data contrast with those collected for
Berbers from North-West Africa where we only
find a "sub-Saharan" contribution of about 20%.
When we include the population of Siwa in the Gm
database of our laboratory (including Berber populations
from Algeria, Tunisia and Morocco, East-
African and sub-Saharan groups), we note that Siwi
are in the margin of North-African Berber variability.
There is neither correspondence between the
genetics and linguistics since the Egyptian Berbers
are clearly related to East African populations
whose dialects belong to a different linguistic family
(Semitic and Cushitic).
These results raise various questions:
would the differences in Gm haplotypic frequencies
between Berbers from the Maghreb and Berbers
from Siwa translate a different origin of these
populations? Would these differences be due to
prehistoric and/or historical genetic contributions of the migrant invaders more or less important on local populations? Are they due to the bottleneck that occurs in the 13th century when only seven families lived in the Oasis? Would the settlement of the Siwa Oasis have occurred from the Nile Valley (by Proto-Mediterraneans) or from the Maghreb
(by Proto-Berbers)? Our discussion will be argued
by the results obtained for other molecular markers

(mitochondrial DNA, microsatellites, Y chromosome).
We are grateful to Pr. Farha El Chennawi
(University of Mansoura, Egypt) and other people who
contributed to the blood sample collection. The sampling was
made within the framework of the action "The Origin of
Man, Language and Languages" (OMLL) and benefited
from funding of the CNRS and the Conseil Regional de
Midi-Pyrénées (Toulouse, France).
Bibliography
ARREDI, B.; POLONI, E.S.; PARACCHINI, S.;
ZERJAL, T.; FATHALLAH, D.M.; MAKRELOUF,
M.; PASCALI, V.L.; NOVELLETTO, A. & TYLERSMITH,
C., 2004.
A predominantly Neolithic Origin for Y-chromosomal
DNA Variation in North Africa. American Journal of
Human Genetics 75: 338-45.
BOSCH, E.; CALAFELL, F.; PÉREZ-LEZAUN, A.;
CLARIMON, J.; COMAS, D.; MATEU, E.; MARTINEZARIAS,
R.; MORERA, B.; BRAKEZ, Z.; AKHAYAT,
O.; SEFIANI, A.; HARITI, G.; CAMBON-THOMSEN,
A. & BERTRANPETIT, J., 2000.
Genetic Structure of north-west Africa revealed by STR
Analysis. European Journal of Human Genetics 8: 360-366.
CAVALLI-SFORZA, L.L.; MENOZZI, P. & PIAZZA,
A., 1994.
The History and Geography of human Genes. Princeton.
COUDRAY, C.; GUITARD, E.; LEMAIRE, O.;
CHERKAOUI, M.; BAALI, A.; HILALI, K.; SEVIN,
A.; KANDIL, M.; HARICH, N.; MELHAOUI, M.;
LARROUY, G.; MORAL, P. & DUGOUJON, J.M.,
2004.
Les allotypes Gm des immunoglobulines chez les
Berbères du Maroc. Antropo 6: 63-69.
DUGOUJON, J.M.; HAZOUT, S.; LOIRAT, F.;
MOURRIERAS, B.; CROUAU-ROY, B. & SANCHEZMAZAS,
A., 2004.
Gm haplotype Diversity of 82 Populations over the
World suggests a centrifugal Model of human Migrations.
American Journal of Physical Anthropology 125: 175-192.
FADHLAOUI-ZID, K.; PLAZA, S.; CALAFELL, F.;
BEN AMOR, M.; COMAS, D. & ELGAAIED, A.B.,
2004.
Mitochondrial DNA Heterogeneity in Tunisian Berbers.
Annals of Human Genetics 68: 222-233.
FAKHRY, A., 1973.
Siwa Oasis. Cairo.
FIELD, L.L. & DUGOUJON, J.M., 1989. Immunoglobulin
allotyping (Gm and Km) of GAW5 Families. Genetic
Epidemiology 6: 31-34.

GONZALEZ-PÉREZ, E.; VIA, M.; ESTEBAN, E.;
LOPEZ-ALOMAR, A.; MAZIERES, S.; HARICH,
N.; KANDIL, M.; DUGOUJON, J.M. & MORAL, P.,
2003.
Alu Insertions in the Iberian Peninsula and north west
Africa - Genetic Boundaries or melting pot ? Collegium
Antropologicum 27: 491-500.
HASSAN, F.A., 1978.
Archeological Explorations of the Siwa Oasis Region,
Egypt. Current Anthropology 19: 146-148.
LEFRANC, M.P. & LEFRANC, G., 1990.
Molecular Genetics of immunoglobulin allotype
Expression [in:] SHAKIB, F. (ed.), The Human IgG
Subclasses: Molecular Analysis of Structure, Function and
Regulation. Oxford: 43-78.

Posts: 2595 | From: Vicksburg | Registered: Feb 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Elijah The Tishbite
Member
Member # 10328

Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Elijah The Tishbite     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Rock Inscriptions, Niloticising the Desert, and the Origin of Egyptian Writing
John C. DARNELL (Yale University, New Haven)


During more than twelve years of work in
the Egyptian Western Desert, the Theban Desert
Road Survey has discovered many Predynastic rock
art and inscription sites on the ancient routes of the southwestern desert of Egypt. At a number of these sites inscriptions are in clear association with other remains of human activity and occupation.

Although many of the dating techniques for rock
art are at best of uncertain value (Bednarik 2002), the sites in the Theban Western Desert that occur in conjunction with archaeological remains allow a cultural attribution. The interrelationships of rock art, habitation, ritual, and burial sites within the
Rayayna desert provide an important template and
test model for those attempting to understand similar
assemblages of petroglyphs and archaeological
material within an extensive landscape (compare
essays in David & Wilson 2002). The area also provides
an excellent opportunity to relate models of
archaeological site formation with models of rock
art site development, and the interrelationships
between such sites and the landscape in which they
are located.
The early sites in the Rayayna desert allow
one in turn to test the reliability of models proposed
for other cultures in an attempt to use formal
methods to "provide a structure for the placement
and nature of this imagery on the landscape"
(Hartley & Vawser 2000). Hartley and Vawser
describe "places with rock-art that serve as 'checkpoints
during movements across the desert terrain'
as assisting in orientation to locales of water or
other necessary resources," a possibility that the
work of the Theban Desert Road Survey has specifically
addressed.
The Rayayna material places us in the unique
position of being able to grasp at least a portion
of the "emic" significance of the rock art through
diachronic evidence. The later developments of
some of the motifs into pharaonic iconographic
elements which are explicitly explained in later textual
material provides an opportunity to avoid some
of the pitfalls of subjective "etic" interpretation
which are otherwise inevitable when one is dealing
with pre-literate societies. The use of rock art in
Upper Egypt as a means of marking places and
commenting upon terrestrial and cosmic processes
and events appears to have led to the increasing
"symbolic" nature of Upper Egyptian cultures, a
necessary precursor, if not direct antecedent, to the
development of true writing in Egypt.
The motifs and use of rock inscriptions
in the Theban Western Desert reveal the development
of a complex repertoire of religious symbols.
These symbols and the more abstract concepts they could communicate allowed the individual
artist/communicator to comment on the terrain,
to communicate with future visitors, to participate
with those who have gone before in an ongoing
interpretation of the terrain (compare Huyge 2002);
they also allowed for personal commentary on the
more generally understood motifs. On these routes
we see the development of a symbolic communication
that linked people, habitation and burial sites,
routes, and landscape, and that led ultimately to the
development of true writing in Egypt around 3250
BCE. The hieroglyphic script originated in the glyphic
symbols of Upper Egyptian rock art.
Bibliography
BEDNARIK, R.G., 2002.
The Dating of Rock Art: A Critique. Journal of
Archaeological Science 29: 1213-1233.
DAVID, B. & WILSON, M. (EDS.), 1993.
Inscribed Landscapes: Marking and making Place. Honolulu.
HARTLEY, R. &.WOLLEY VAWSER, A.M., 2000. Spatial
Behaviour and Learning in the Prehistoric Environment
of the Colorado River Drainage (south-Eastern Utah),
Western North America [in:] CHIPPINDALE, C. &
TAÇON, P.S.C. (eds.), The Archaeology of Rock-Art.
Cambridge: 185-211.
HUYGE, D., 2002.
Cosmology, Ideology, and Personal Religious Practice in
Ancient Egyptian Rock Art [in:] FRIEDMAN, R.F. (ed.),
Egypt and Nubia: Gifts of the Desert. London: 192-206.

Posts: 2595 | From: Vicksburg | Registered: Feb 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Elijah The Tishbite
Member
Member # 10328

Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Elijah The Tishbite     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
http://origines2.free.fr/annexes/resumes.pdf
Posts: 2595 | From: Vicksburg | Registered: Feb 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
   

Quick Reply
Message:

HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.

Instant Graemlins
   


Post New Topic  New Poll  Post A Reply Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


Contact Us | EgyptSearch!

(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com

Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3